Within Nevada UFOs
What Area 51 Really Adds to UFO History
Area 51 tested real secret aircraft, but public evidence does not show that alien spacecraft were stored or studied there.
On this page
- Groom Lake and Cold War reconnaissance
- How secrecy encouraged alien speculation
- What the public evidence does not prove
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Area 51 is a real secret aviation site in southern Nevada, but the public evidence does not show that it stored alien spacecraft, bodies or extraterrestrial technology. What declassified records do show is historically important in its own right: Groom Lake was used to test aircraft so advanced, and so tightly protected, that observers sometimes reported them as unidentified flying objects. Government silence then prevented ordinary explanations from being offered.
That combination — unfamiliar aircraft, restricted airspace and official denial — made Area 51 inseparable from modern UFO mythology. The site matters within Nevada’s UFO history because it demonstrates how genuine secrecy can generate sincere sightings while also giving unsupported claims an appearance of plausibility. The central distinction is therefore between secrets that have been documented, such as the U-2 and A-12 reconnaissance programmes, and alien claims that remain unsupported by verifiable physical evidence, authenticated records or independently confirmed witness testimony.[gwu.edu]nsarchive.gwu.eduarea 51 file secret aircraft soviet migsNational Security ArchiveThe Area 51 File: Secret Aircraft and Soviet MiGsOct 29, 2013 — Declassified documents help demonstrate the cent…
Groom Lake and Cold War reconnaissance
Groom Lake is a dry lake bed inside Nevada’s extensive military testing lands, north-west of Las Vegas. Its isolation, predictable weather and distance from major population centres made it suitable for aircraft that could not safely or openly be tested at conventional bases. In 1955, the site was selected for Project AQUATONE, the CIA programme that produced the U-2 high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft. The location later supported the A-12 OXCART, a faster and more advanced spy plane that first flew there in April 1962.[cia.gov]cia.govarea 51 and the accidental test flightArea 51 and the Accidental Test FlightAug 6, 2015 — The first flight test of the CIA's A-12 OXCART took place at the Groom Lake facili…
These aircraft help explain why Area 51 acquired a UFO connection before alien stories became dominant. The U-2 flew far higher than ordinary commercial and military aircraft of the 1950s. When it caught sunlight after the ground below had entered darkness, it could appear as a bright or fiery object against the evening sky. Pilots and civilian observers were not accustomed to seeing aircraft operating at such altitudes, while air-traffic controllers and investigators often lacked clearance to know what was being tested.
A declassified CIA history later stated that U-2 and subsequent OXCART flights accounted for more than half of UFO reports received during parts of the late 1950s and 1960s. That figure comes from an internal historical assessment rather than a case-by-case public audit, so it should not be treated as a precise measurement of every report made during the period. Even so, the broader conclusion is well supported: classified reconnaissance flights produced numerous sightings that could not be truthfully explained at the time without exposing sensitive programmes.[cia.gov]cia.govDOC 0005517742CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo…
Officials investigating reports faced a practical conflict. They wanted to determine whether a sighting represented a Soviet aircraft, an intelligence threat or an ordinary mistake, but they also had to conceal American test flights. According to the CIA’s historical account, Air Force investigators sometimes attributed sightings to conventional causes even when classified aircraft were suspected. This did not mean investigators believed aliens were responsible. It meant the truthful explanation was itself secret.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo…
The secrets were broader than one spy plane
Area 51 was not merely a U-2 airfield. Declassified material links Groom Lake to a succession of advanced aviation and intelligence projects, including the A-12, stealth development, radar testing and the evaluation of secretly acquired Soviet aircraft. The National Security Archive has published records concerning programmes in which MiG-17 and MiG-21 fighters were studied so American pilots and engineers could understand their performance and weaknesses.[National Security Archive]nsarchive.gwu.eduarea 51 file secret aircraft soviet migsNational Security ArchiveThe Area 51 File: Secret Aircraft and Soviet MiGsOct 29, 2013 — Declassified documents help demonstrate the cent…
This history matters because unfamiliar shapes and flight characteristics did not end with the U-2. Stealth aircraft were designed specifically to behave differently on radar and, in some cases, to look unlike familiar aeroplanes. Early prototypes could therefore produce reports from people who accurately saw something unusual but lacked enough information to identify it. A truthful witness can still reach the wrong conclusion when distance, altitude, speed and scale are uncertain.
The pattern also continued after individual aircraft became public. Once the U-2, A-12 or F-117 was acknowledged, it was tempting to assume that every unexplained light near Groom Lake must be another hidden prototype. That may sometimes have been true, but it is not a complete explanation for every claim. Some observations may have involved routine aircraft, flares, planets, atmospheric effects or misjudged distances. Others remain too poorly documented to resolve. The fact that secret technology existed does not automatically validate either a military explanation or an extraterrestrial one in a particular case.
How secrecy encouraged alien speculation
For decades, the United States government avoided formally acknowledging Area 51’s role, even though its location was widely known to aviation enthusiasts, residents and UFO investigators. The site appeared in photographs and maps, workers travelled to it and aircraft watchers observed activity from surrounding public land. Yet the government’s refusal to discuss it created an unusual situation in which the existence of a place was obvious while its official status remained elusive.
That ambiguity strengthened conspiracy claims. A denial about the site could be interpreted not as protection of an aircraft programme, but as proof that something more extraordinary was being hidden. Later confirmation of previously denied aviation projects then reinforced the argument: if officials had concealed the U-2 and stealth aircraft, perhaps they were also concealing alien craft. This reasoning identifies a genuine history of secrecy but makes an unsupported leap about what the secrecy contained.
The environmental dispute involving former Groom Lake workers shows how real secrecy could extend beyond aircraft specifications. Workers alleged that hazardous material had been burned in open pits and that exposure had caused serious illness. The government resisted disclosure on national-security grounds, and litigation was hindered by the state-secrets privilege. The case concerned alleged toxic exposure, not extraterrestrials, but it demonstrated that officials were prepared to withhold ordinary operational information about the facility.[spokesman.com]spokesman.comReview The Secrets At Area 51 Deadly, Real It's Toxic Waste, NotReview The Secrets At Area 51 Deadly, Real It's Toxic Waste, Not
This kind of secrecy creates a credibility problem that official reports cannot easily undo. When the government later says that no alien hardware has been found, sceptical readers may respond that the same institutions previously concealed real programmes. That suspicion is understandable. It does not, however, amount to evidence that alien material exists.
Bob Lazar and the S-4 story
The most influential alien claim associated directly with Area 51 came from Bob Lazar. In televised interviews beginning in 1989, Lazar said that he had worked at a facility called S-4 near Groom Lake, where he had been assigned to help reverse-engineer one of several recovered flying saucers. His account included descriptions of a disc-shaped craft, a gravity-based propulsion system and a fuel involving element 115.
The story transformed Area 51 from a relatively specialised subject among aircraft watchers into a major centre of alien-conspiracy culture. It also helped turn nearby Rachel, Nevada, and the stretch of State Route 375 later named the Extraterrestrial Highway into destinations for UFO tourism. Contemporary reporting noted that Lazar’s allegations drew growing numbers of visitors even though significant parts of his background could not be confirmed.[Smithsonian Magazine]smithsonianmag.comSmithsonian Magazine Inexplicable MomentsSmithsonian Magazine Inexplicable Moments
There are fragments of evidence showing that Lazar had some connection to the scientific and technical world around Los Alamos. A period telephone directory listed him, and a 1982 local newspaper profile described him as working at the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility. Those details weaken the simplest claim that he had no link at all to Los Alamos. They do not establish that he was a physicist with the advanced degrees he claimed, that he held the security access required for a spacecraft programme or that he ever worked at a Groom Lake facility.
The more important problem is evidential. Lazar has not produced an authenticated employment record from S-4, a verifiable security document, a sample of exotic material, technical notes capable of independent testing or another witness whose evidence firmly establishes the alleged programme. The educational history he gave — including claimed degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology — has also proved difficult to verify. Supporters argue that records may have been erased, but that explanation is not independently demonstrated and risks making the claim impossible to test: missing evidence becomes treated as proof of the cover-up.
His reference to element 115 is sometimes presented as a successful prediction because scientists later created the element now called moscovium. In reality, the possible existence of an element with atomic number 115 followed from the known structure of the periodic table. The isotopes actually produced are extremely unstable; their discovery did not confirm Lazar’s claim that a stable isotope could power a spacecraft. The later laboratory synthesis therefore does not validate the propulsion story.
Lazar’s account remains culturally important because it supplied the detailed narrative that Area 51 mythology had previously lacked. As evidence, however, it depends mainly on his testimony. It has not developed into a publicly verifiable case.
Why later disclosures did not prove the alien story
The 2013 release of a declassified CIA history was widely described as the government’s first formal acknowledgement of Area 51. The documents confirmed Groom Lake’s role in the U-2 and OXCART programmes and identified the site on a map. They were significant because they replaced speculation about at least part of the base’s history with documentary evidence. They did not describe recovered spacecraft, alien bodies or extraterrestrial engineering.[National Security Archive]nsarchive2.gwu.eduNational Security Archive The Secret History of the U-2Area 51 declassified: No UFOs, Finally Acknowledged By US Government Sky News, during a…
For believers, the absence of alien material in those records proves little because genuinely sensitive files could remain classified. That is logically possible, but it places the claim beyond the available evidence. Declassification can show that a secret programme existed; it cannot prove every alleged programme that might still be imagined. The proper conclusion is limited: the released documents confirm secret aviation work and do not substantiate the alien claims.
More recent official investigations have reached a similar position. In its 2024 historical review, the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, said it found no empirical evidence that the United States government or private contractors had been reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology. It reported that many allegations concerned misunderstood classified programmes, circular reporting or claims that could not be corroborated. AARO also examined a metal sample said to have come from an off-world craft and concluded that it was ordinary terrestrial material.[AAROM]aaro.milAARO Historical Record Report VolMAARO_Historical_Record_Repor…6 Mar 2024 — • No evidence of extraterrestrial origin of UFO/UAP were discovered…. the reported UF…
AARO’s findings do not prove that every government unit has always been fully transparent. Critics have questioned whether official reviews had complete access, whether witnesses felt safe speaking and whether unresolved cases received sufficient attention. Those are legitimate questions about investigative reach. They do not alter the present evidential balance: publicly checkable material supports secret aerospace development at Groom Lake, while claims of alien storage or reverse-engineering remain unverified.
What the public evidence does not prove
The Area 51 story is often reduced to a choice between two extremes: either nothing unusual happened there, or the government recovered alien technology. The record supports neither simplification.
Several conclusions are well established:
- Groom Lake was used for highly classified aircraft and intelligence work.[fas.org]fas.orggroom lake related environmentgroom lake related environment
- Some secret flights produced reports of unusual objects.
- Officials sometimes withheld accurate explanations to protect those programmes.
- The government concealed operational and environmental information about the site.
- Later declassification confirmed activities that had long been denied or left unacknowledged.
None of those points proves that extraterrestrial craft were present. Evidence capable of supporting that stronger conclusion would need to be correspondingly strong: material available for independent laboratory examination, authenticated records with a clear chain of custody, multiple directly placed witnesses whose accounts agree on testable details, or imagery and sensor data that rule out conventional technology and error.
The public Area 51 alien claims have not met that threshold. Photographs of distant lights do not establish their origin. Stories repeated by multiple people are not independent if they derive from the same original allegation. A witness’s apparent sincerity does not verify technical claims. Missing records may raise suspicion, but they cannot by themselves demonstrate what was supposedly removed.
It is also important not to confuse “unidentified” with “extraterrestrial”. A report may remain unidentified because the observation was brief, the location uncertain, the image poor or the relevant flight information classified. Unresolved means the available data do not permit a reliable conclusion. It does not mean the most dramatic explanation has prevailed.
What Area 51 really adds to UFO history
Area 51’s greatest contribution to Nevada’s UFO history is not evidence of alien visitation. It is a documented example of how secret technology can create unidentified sightings and how official concealment can reshape the public interpretation of those sightings.
The site demonstrates three mechanisms that recur throughout Nevada’s UFO record. First, classified aircraft can look extraordinary to observers who lack information about their altitude, design or purpose. Second, truthful explanations may be withheld for national-security reasons. Third, once concealment is exposed, later denials become less persuasive even when they may be accurate.
That history justifies caution in both directions. It would be naïve to assume that every unusual sighting near the Nevada test ranges involved a familiar aircraft, because experimental systems have repeatedly operated there. It would be equally mistaken to treat secrecy as confirmation of aliens. The strongest interpretation is narrower and more useful: Area 51 contained real secrets, those secrets helped generate UFO reports, and the resulting climate of mistrust allowed alien claims to flourish far beyond the evidence supporting them.
Within Nevada’s wider UFO story, Groom Lake is therefore best understood as the meeting point of advanced aviation and mythology. Its documented aircraft programmes strengthened the case that some sightings had hidden but human causes. Its secrecy weakened public confidence in official explanations. Its alien legend remains powerful, but public disclosures to date have strengthened the aviation history rather than the extraterrestrial one.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Area 51 Really Adds to UFO History. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Dreamland: Travels Inside the Secret World of Roswell and Are...
Examines how secrecy fueled UFO mythology.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Places Area 51 claims alongside better documented cases.
Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Milita...
Documents the site's real history and separates confirmed programs from legend.
The Hunt for Zero Point
Explores advanced aerospace research often linked to Area 51 speculation.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromGroom Lake sign oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf
Source snippet
MAARO_Historical_Record_Repor...6 Mar 2024 — • No evidence of extraterrestrial origin of UFO/UAP were discovered.... the reported UF...
2.
Source: cia.gov
Title: area 51 and the accidental test flight
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/area-51-and-the-accidental-test-flight/
Source snippet
Area 51 and the Accidental Test FlightAug 6, 2015 — The first flight test of the CIA's A-12 OXCART took place at the Groom Lake facili...
3.
Source: cia.gov
Title: Archangel CIAs Supersonic A 12 Reconnaissance Aircraft
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Archangel-CIAs-Supersonic-A-12-Reconnaissance-Aircraft.pdf
Source snippet
ARCHANGEL:by D ROBARGE · Cited by 25 — Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and OXCART Programs, 1954-1974. Washington: Central Intelligen...
4.
Source: cia.gov
Title: DOC 0005517742
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005517742.pdf
Source snippet
CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo...
Published: November 1954
5.
Source: cia.gov
Title: ask molly what really went on at area 51
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/ask-molly-what-really-went-on-at-area-51/
Source snippet
Ask Molly: What really went on at Area 51?Jul 1, 2022 — According to CIA investigators, “U-2 and later OXCART flights accounted for mo...
6.
Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/library/ciaufo.html
7.
Source: cia.gov
Title: DOC 0000838057
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000838057.pdf
8.
Source: spokesman.com
Title: Review The Secrets At Area 51 Deadly, Real It’s Toxic Waste, Not
Link:https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1997/jul/20/the-secrets-at-area-51-deadly-real-its-toxic/
9.
Source: fas.org
Title: groom lake related environment
Link:https://fas.org/publication/groom_lake-related_environment/
10.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/07083374
11.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/1992-04-01A.pdf
12.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/ufos-fact-or-fiction
13.
Source: cia.gov
Title: FOIA CASE LOG CALENDER YE[16111550]
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/FOIA%20CASE%20LOG%20CALENDER%20YE%5B16111550%5D.pdf
14.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CY%202007%20CASE%20LOG%5B15829352%5D.pdf
15.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/06935701
16.
Source: history.com
Title: u s air force reports on roswell
Link:https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/june-24/u-s-air-force-reports-on-roswell
17.
Source: time.com
Title: aliens or dummies
Link:https://time.com/archive/6930414/aliens-or-dummies/
18.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: area 51 file secret aircraft soviet migs
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/intelligence/2013-10-29/area-51-file-secret-aircraft-soviet-migs
Source snippet
National Security ArchiveThe Area 51 File: Secret Aircraft and Soviet MiGsOct 29, 2013 — Declassified documents help demonstrate the cent...
19.
Source: nsarchive2.gwu.edu
Title: National Security Archive The Secret History of the U-2
Link:https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB434/
Source snippet
Area 51 declassified: No UFOs, Finally Acknowledged By US Government Sky News, during a...
20.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?page=1&s=buy+fc+coins+ps5+Bes%C3%B6k+Buyfc26coins.com+Hj%C3%A4lpsamt+kundst%C3%B6d+som+guidade+mig+genom+f%C3%B6rsta+best%C3%A4llningen..NmMZ
21.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: National Security Archive Search
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?page=45&s=Cheap+fc+coins+Buyfc26coins.com+has+the+perfect+answer+%3A+What+daily+routine+is+best+for+FC+Coins+trading%3F.c5EG
22.
Source: rcfp.org
Title: high court wont review state secrets privilege area 51 case
Link:https://www.rcfp.org/high-court-wont-review-state-secrets-privilege-area-51-case/
23.
Source: smithsonianmag.com
Title: Smithsonian Magazine Inexplicable Moments
Link:https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/inexplicable-moments-175793238/
24.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area
25.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Bob Lazar
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar
26.
Source: dictionary.cambridge.org
Link:https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/area
27.
Source: dictionary.cambridge.org
Link:https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/area
28.
Source: science.howstuffworks.com
Title: bob lazar
Link:https://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/bob-lazar.htm
29.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: 2022 06 07 slashgear.com the big myth about area 51 you need to stop believing
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-07/2022-06-07_slashgear.com-the_big_myth_about_area_51_you_need_to_stop_believing.pdf
30.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: science technology
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/subjects/science-technology?page=3
31.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?op=Search&page=16&s=The+Cold+War
32.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: cia u 2 collection signals intelligence 1956
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/intelligence-nuclear-vault/2022-03-08/cia-u-2-collection-signals-intelligence-1956
33.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: guide researchers gwu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/about/guide-researchers-gwu
34.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?page=51&s=u7buy+fc+Coinsnight.com+FC+coins%25+OFF+code%3A+FC2026.+Good+service+will+definitely+buy+again.ocSw
35.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: briefing books
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/postings/briefing-books?page=24
36.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?page=36&s=fc+coins+Buyfc26coins.com+is+official+EA+Sports+partner+for+FC+coins+The+service+was+incredibly+fast+indeed..rDAd
37.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: washingtonian magazine profiles national security archive
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/news/foia/2024-06-28/washingtonian-magazine-profiles-national-security-archive
38.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?page=3&s=fc+coins+for+sale+xbox+one+Visit+Buyfc26coins.com+for+latest+FC+coins+news..The5
39.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?op=Search&page=0&s=Lockheed
40.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?page=6&s=best+way+to+buy+fc+coins+Visit+Buyfc26coins.com+Meglep%C5%91dtem%2C+milyen+egyszer%C5%B1+volt+FC+%C3%A9rm%C3%A9ket+v%C3%A1s%C3%A1rolni..VjDQ
41.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/media/28092/ocr
42.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/search?op=Search&page=3&s=israel
43.
Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu
Title: armed forces military strategy
Link:https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/subjects/armed-forces-military-strategy?page=3
44.
Source: abcnews.com
Link:https://abcnews.com/US/area-51-revealed-cia-spy-plane-documents/story?id=19977635
45.
Source: mathworld.wolfram.com
Link:https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Area.html
Additional References
46.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Inside Area 51 | Bill Yoak’s Time With Lockheed and Skunk Works in Groom Lake
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-4kyOBCVWA
Source snippet
Annie Jacobsen on Book, Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Military Base...
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1VexbCgbso
Source snippet
The Truth About Area 51 | Alien Technology or Military Secrets?...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Area 51’s First Secret: Forging the U-2 Spy Plane
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rV7jcLrM4CE
Source snippet
Inside Area 51 | Bill Yoak's Time With Lockheed and Skunk Works in Groom Lake...
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Truth About Area 51 | Alien Technology or Military Secrets?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFYAH0TGtXQ
Source snippet
Area 51: The Original Mystery | Mystery Wire...
50.
Source: merriam-webster.com
Link:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/area
51.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOB/comments/1m3wvak/area_51_staff_left_with_fatal_diseases_after/
52.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/13jymvx/bob_lazars_education_fact_vs_fiction_based_on_new/
53.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1shfkgt/nuclear_physicist_and_ufologist_stanton_friedman/
54.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1sp6a2q/physicist_stanton_friedman_debates_jeremy_corbell/
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/NewsNationNow/posts/ross-coulthart-answers-questions-about-why-bob-lazar-has-never-testified-to-cong/923205223419829/