Within Tennessee UFOs
How Strong Was the Memphis Police UFO Case?
The 1977 Memphis case stands out because several police officers reportedly observed a large hovering object from separate positions.
On this page
- What officers reported near Pine Hill Park
- Why multiple witnesses strengthen the account
- What evidence is still missing
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The Memphis police UFO case is one of Tennessee’s more persuasive eyewitness incidents, but not one of its best-documented physical cases. At about 3.30 am on 17 May 1977, Memphis police officers Lamar Todd and Jerry Jeter reportedly watched a large, triangular object hovering near Pine Hill Golf Course in South Memphis. Todd later said that three other Memphis officers reported a similar object from elsewhere in the city, apparently giving the event several official witnesses rather than a single observer.[Memphis Flyer]memphisflyer.comworld ufo dayMemphis FlyerWorld UFO DayNovember 29, 1 — 2 Jul 2015 — It wasn't your typical Tuesday morning for Memphis police officers Lamar Todd and…
That corroboration is why the case still matters. Separate police observations reduce the likelihood that Todd and Jeter simply invented the episode or experienced an entirely private illusion. They do not, however, establish the object’s size, distance, speed or origin. No publicly available photograph, radar plot, recording, preserved police report or detailed set of independent witness statements has emerged to test the most extraordinary parts of the story. The fairest assessment is therefore that the officers probably saw something genuinely puzzling, but that the surviving evidence is too incomplete to determine what it was.
What officers reported near Pine Hill Park
Todd and Jeter were working in an unmarked surveillance van in the early hours of 17 May. According to Todd’s later account, Jeter first noticed something above power lines as they travelled near the Norris Road junction. Todd did not immediately see it, so they continued north, turned around at South Parkway and approached again from the opposite direction. Both then reportedly saw the object above the power lines leading towards Pine Hill Golf Course and Pine Hill Park.[PBS]pbs.orgWhere to Watch UFOs Over MemphisLamar Todd is a retired Memphis police officer. He and his wife run… This time, Todd was not alone…
The officers left the van near an exit ramp and watched for roughly four or five minutes. Todd described a triangular form with three lights along its sides. He said it appeared to be hovering close to the power lines and made no detectable engine, wind or propulsion noise. Published retellings have compared its apparent size with a football field, although this was an unaided estimate made at night without a confirmed distance or altitude.[Memphis Flyer]memphisflyer.comworld ufo dayMemphis FlyerWorld UFO DayNovember 29, 1 — 2 Jul 2015 — It wasn't your typical Tuesday morning for Memphis police officers Lamar Todd and…
Jeter, who was reportedly assigned as a police sniper, returned to the van for a rifle fitted with a telescopic sight. Todd said that as the rifle was brought out, the object began moving north and then disappeared across the horizon with startling speed. Later popular versions sometimes imply that it reacted directly to the weapon, but the observation does not demonstrate cause and effect. The movement may simply have coincided with Jeter retrieving the rifle.[Memphis Flyer]memphisflyer.comworld ufo dayMemphis FlyerWorld UFO DayNovember 29, 1 — 2 Jul 2015 — It wasn't your typical Tuesday morning for Memphis police officers Lamar Todd and…
Todd then radioed the police dispatcher and asked for a check with airport ground control. In his later telling, the answer was that no unidentified traffic had been detected in the area. He also recalled being told that three officers associated with a north Memphis precinct had reported a similar object. Additional reports attributed to state troopers in Brownsville and Alamo have appeared in the later narrative, but the surviving public accounts provide little detail about those observations or whether they described the same object at compatible times and bearings.[PBS]pbs.orgWhere to Watch UFOs Over MemphisLamar Todd is a retired Memphis police officer. He and his wife run… This time, Todd was not alone…
This difference matters. Five Memphis police witnesses are repeatedly mentioned in reputable local coverage and in the 2015 WKNO documentary, whereas the more distant state-police reports are less clearly documented. It is therefore safest to treat the Memphis corroboration as the core of the case and the outlying reports as claims requiring further archival confirmation.
Why multiple witnesses strengthen the account
Police officers are not automatically more accurate than other observers, but their testimony can be valuable. They are accustomed to reporting times, places, directions, vehicles and unusual activity. Todd and Jeter also had a prolonged observation rather than a fleeting glimpse, and they reportedly changed position before stopping to watch. Those features make the encounter more substantial than a report based on a lone point of light seen for a few seconds.
The strongest element is the claim that other officers reported a similarly shaped object from separate locations. Independent witnesses can help test whether an observation was caused by a problem specific to one person, such as fatigue, eyesight or momentary confusion. Reports from different parts of Memphis might also have allowed investigators to estimate a flight path or altitude through triangulation, had exact locations, times and viewing directions been preserved.
Several qualifications limit that apparent corroboration:
- The degree of independence is uncertain. It is unclear whether the other officers described the object before hearing Todd’s radio call or after the dispatcher had circulated information about its appearance.
- Their full accounts are not readily available. The public narrative is dominated by Todd’s later testimony. The names, sketches and verbatim statements of all five officers have not been presented together in an accessible primary file.
- “The same description” is imprecise. A comparison requires more than agreement that something was triangular or carried several lights. Investigators would need bearings, elevation angles, duration, direction of travel and the exact wording used by each witness.
- Night-time scale estimates are fragile. Without a known distance, a small nearby object and a much larger distant one can produce the same apparent size. Claims that the object was as large as a football field or crossed 14 to 16 miles in about a second depend on assumptions that were not instrumentally verified.
Todd’s credibility is helped by the consistency of his central narrative decades later: the location, the turn at South Parkway, the triangular appearance, the lights, the silence and Jeter’s attempt to use the scope recur in local accounts and his filmed interview.[memphisflyer.com]memphisflyer.comMemphis Flyer World UFO DayThe National Enquirer listed the Memphis sighting among the best UFO stories of 1977, which, being the year of Star Wars and rampant 1950… Yet consistency over time does not guarantee accuracy. Repeatedly recounting a vivid memory can preserve its main structure while estimates and interpretations become more definite.
How the case was promoted and investigated
The incident attracted national attention through the National Enquirer, which operated an annual award scheme for UFO evidence. In June 1978, the paper reportedly awarded $7,500 to five Memphis police officers for what its panel considered the most scientifically valuable UFO evidence of 1977. Todd and Jeter received the largest share.[Isaac Koi Archive]isaackoi.comIsaac Koi Archive10Consensus lists: National Enquirer Panel | Isaac Koi ArchiveOn 13 June 1978, the National Enquirer reported (see Footnote 10.41) that a…
The award shows that the account impressed a group assembled to judge reported UFO cases. It is not equivalent to a government finding or peer-reviewed scientific conclusion. The National Enquirer was a mass-market tabloid with a strong interest in dramatic UFO stories, and payment introduces a possible incentive even when witnesses are sincere. The award should therefore be treated as part of the case’s media history, not as independent proof of an extraordinary craft.
The timing also affected official scrutiny. The US Air Force had ended Project Blue Book, its formal UFO investigation programme, in 1969. By 1977 there was no routine federal system comparable to Blue Book that would automatically collect Memphis police statements, obtain radar tapes and publish an official conclusion.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKAs a result of these investigations and studies and experience gained from investigating UFO reports since 1948, the conclusions of Proje… The case instead passed largely through newspapers, private UFO investigators and later television reporting.
Modern interest was revived in 2015 when Tennessee and Mississippi members of the Mutual UFO Network helped organise a World UFO Day event at Pine Hill Park. Todd appeared publicly, and WKNO produced a documentary containing an extended interview and a reconstruction of the encounter.[pbs.org]pbs.orgWhere to Watch UFOs Over MemphisLamar Todd is a retired Memphis police officer. He and his wife run… This time, Todd was not alone… This later coverage preserved useful first-person testimony, but it did not uncover the missing technical evidence needed to settle the event.
What ordinary explanations can and cannot cover
No convincing, case-specific conventional explanation has been demonstrated in the accessible record. A bright planet would not readily account for an apparently structured triangular form that several officers reportedly saw from different positions. A meteor would be too brief to hover for several minutes. A normal aeroplane could show several lights, but Todd’s description of stationary hovering, silence and extreme departure speed does not resemble an ordinary aircraft as he perceived it.
That does not leave an exotic vehicle as the only alternative. Several ordinary mechanisms remain possible because the essential measurements are absent.
A distant aircraft seen nearly head-on can appear stationary until its direction changes. Several aircraft lights can create the impression of a single dark triangular body, especially against an unlit sky. Atmospheric conditions can alter the apparent brightness and position of lights. Helicopters, balloons, advertising devices or misjudged objects closer to the observers must also remain within the range of possibilities unless contemporary flight, weather and equipment records exclude them.
The reported acceleration is particularly difficult to assess. If witnesses misjudged the object’s distance, they would also misjudge its size and speed. A light that simply went out, turned away or became obscured could appear to have crossed the horizon almost instantaneously. Todd’s account clearly conveys what the departure looked like to him, but it does not provide the measured trajectory needed to demonstrate extraordinary performance.
The airport enquiry offers limited help. Todd recalled that ground control had no unidentified target, but this is not the same as confirming that radar covered the relevant altitude and direction or that no aircraft was present. No radar image, controller statement or communications recording has been published alongside the account. A negative verbal check therefore neither confirms a solid object nor rules out all conventional traffic.
What evidence is still missing
The case would be much stronger if its underlying records could be assembled. The most important missing items are the original Memphis Police Department incident or communications report, the dispatcher’s radio log, statements from each of the five officers, airport radar or controller records, and contemporary weather and aviation data. A map showing each witness position and viewing direction could establish whether the reports genuinely converged on one location.
Modern UAP investigations emphasise precisely this type of supporting material. NASA has stated that observations are extremely difficult to verify without extensive data, while the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office asks for original imagery, sensor information and detailed metadata rather than relying only on narrative recollection.[NASA]nasa.govAnnounces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team MembersAnnounces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members The Memphis case illustrates why: several credible people may honestly describe an impressive event, yet analysts still cannot calculate its altitude, dimensions or velocity.
There is also no known physical trace associated with the Pine Hill observation. Nothing was recovered, and no photograph, film, confirmed electromagnetic effect or environmental change has been tied to the object. Todd’s earlier claim of being illuminated by a circular white light during a solitary 1973 police patrol is interesting biographical context, but he did not formally report it at the time and it cannot independently validate the 1977 event.[PBS]pbs.orgWhere to Watch UFOs Over MemphisLamar Todd is a retired Memphis police officer. He and his wife run… This time, Todd was not alone…
How strong was the Memphis police UFO case?
As witness testimony, the Memphis case is stronger than most isolated UFO reports. Two officers apparently watched the object together at close apparent range, and three further officers reportedly described something similar from other parts of the city. Todd openly identified himself, gave a detailed account and continued to stand by it long after leaving the police. The encounter consequently deserves a place in Tennessee’s UFO history alongside the state’s better-known official and aviation-related reports.
As scientific evidence, however, it is much weaker. The story survives mainly through retrospective interviews, local journalism and UFO literature rather than a complete contemporary case file. The witnesses’ estimated size and speed cannot be checked, the independence of the additional reports is uncertain, and the claimed airport enquiry is unsupported by preserved radar data. Later reporting kept the account alive but did not materially strengthen its evidential foundation.
The most defensible conclusion is that Todd, Jeter and probably other officers witnessed an aerial display they could not identify. Their testimony makes casual dismissal inappropriate, but it does not establish a gigantic craft, impossible acceleration or a non-human origin. The Memphis police case remains unresolved because too little testable information survives, not because ordinary explanations have been conclusively eliminated.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Strong Was the Memphis Police UFO Case?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Examines witness testimony and investigative standards relevant to police sightings.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Includes official-witness cases comparable to police reports.
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Provides historical context for government and law-enforcement reports.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: pbs.org
Link:https://www.pbs.org/video/ufos-over-memphis-ibgvha/
Source snippet
Where to Watch UFOs Over MemphisLamar Todd is a retired Memphis police officer. He and his wife run... This time, Todd was not alone...
2.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
As a result of these investigations and studies and experience gained from investigating UFO reports since 1948, the conclusions of Proje...
3.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary
Source snippet
After an extensive interagency partnership between the two entities to redact personally identifiable information from Blue Book case fil...
4.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/
5.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Mission History | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/citizen-archivist/missions/history
6.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
7.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections
8.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
9.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/textual-and-microfilm
10.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/publications
11.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: UPDAT E: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/
12.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A to Release, Discuss Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Report
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/
13.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Provides Coverage of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Meeting
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-provides-coverage-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-meeting/
14.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: saucers over washington the history of project blue book
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/12/19/saucers-over-washington-the-history-of-project-blue-book/
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: 50 Years Ago: Government stops investigating UFOs | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2020/nr20-19
16.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
17.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170009052
18.
Source: pds.nasa.gov
Title: view Profile.jsp
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/ds-view/pds/viewProfile.jsp?dsid=MR9-M-RSS-5-ELEDENPROFILES-V1.0
19.
Source: pds.nasa.gov
Title: view Profile.jsp
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/ds-view/pds/viewProfile.jsp?dsid=MSL-M-REMS-2-EDR-V1.0
20.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: identifying ufos and uaps
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/skywatching/night-sky-network/identifying-ufos-and-uaps/
21.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: project blue book looking to the film record
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2013/09/30/project-blue-book-looking-to-the-film-record/
22.
Source: nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: display All.cfm
Link:https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayAll.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_8621001B&page_name=all
23.
Source: nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: display CA.cfm
Link:https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayCA.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_86210001&page_name=AppdxI2
24.
Source: nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: display All.cfm
Link:https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayAll.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_86210001&page_name=ALL
25.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/341.html
26.
Source: memphisflyer.com
Title: world ufo day
Link:https://www.memphisflyer.com/world-ufo-day/
Source snippet
Memphis FlyerWorld UFO DayNovember 29, 1 — 2 Jul 2015 — It wasn't your typical Tuesday morning for Memphis police officers Lamar Todd and...
28.
Source: isaackoi.com
Title: Isaac Koi Archive10
Link:https://isaackoi.com/ufog/best-ufo-cases/10-consensus-lists-national-enquirer-panel/
Source snippet
Consensus lists: National Enquirer Panel | Isaac Koi ArchiveOn 13 June 1978, the National Enquirer reported (see Footnote 10.41) that a...
Published: June 1978
29.
Source: memphismagazine.com
Title: Memphis magazine World UFO Day Festival Lands in Memphis
Link:https://memphismagazine.com/features/columns/world-ufo-day-festival-lands-in-memphis/
30.
Source: military.com
Link:https://www.military.com/history/first-air-force-pilot-die-chasing-ufo-was-actually-chasing-secret-balloon.html
31.
Source: memphisflyer.com
Title: COVE R STORY: Murder at the Miss Memphis Pageant
Link:https://www.memphisflyer.com/cover-story-murder-at-the-miss-memphis-pageant/
Additional References
32.
Source: wknofm.org
Link:https://www.wknofm.org/news-and-features/2015-07-01/close-encounters-of-the-memphis-kind
Source snippet
Here, on a clear night in 1977, he and his partner observed something very strange.... Pine Hill Community Center, 973 Alice Avenue, wil...
33.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Starseed: An East Tennessee experiencer interacts with UAPs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIPOhX_8u2s
Source snippet
Movie Boy Mike Goes to Tennessee (Part 1)The Making of My UFO Documentary...
34.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Declassified UFO Photos over East Tennessee NUCLEAR WEAPON Facility
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lj9XiXuOCdI
Source snippet
Starseed: An East Tennessee experiencer interacts with UAPs...
35.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs over Memphis
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsxgymkGZP8
Source snippet
Declassified UFO Photos over East Tennessee NUCLEAR WEAPON Facility...
Published: July 30, 2015
36.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/
37.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Submit-A-Report/
38.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/4/
39.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information_for_UAP_Analysis-20240125.pdf
40.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/wxyzdetroit/posts/after-responding-deputies-saw-two-balloons-one-green-and-the-other-blue-flying-a/10155147625226135/
41.
Source: nicap.org
Link:https://www.nicap.org/NSID_DBListingbyCat1.pdf