Within Pennsylvania UFOs
What Do Pennsylvania's Official UFO Records Reveal?
Blue Book files, police reports and later records disputes show how Pennsylvania sightings were documented, classified and sometimes left incomplete.
On this page
- Project Blue Book and Pennsylvania reports
- Police, military and investigator documentation
- Freedom of Information disputes and missing files
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Pennsylvania’s official UFO record reveals a pattern more complicated than either a government cover-up or a complete official explanation. Federal files show that the United States Air Force investigated reports from the state, collected witness statements and police information, compared sightings with aircraft, astronomical objects and classified activity, and sometimes closed cases with conventional explanations. Other reports remained unidentified or were filed with too little information for a firm conclusion. The surviving paperwork is therefore evidence of investigation, not proof that extraordinary craft were present.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects25 Jun 2024 — From 1947 to 1969, a total of 12, 618 sightings were report…
The record also has important limits. Project Blue Book ended in 1969, so its archive is not a continuous catalogue of Pennsylvania sightings. Police reports, military messages, newspaper cuttings and private investigators’ notes were created by different organisations under different retention rules. The Kecksburg case later exposed how missing, destroyed or poorly indexed records can prolong controversy without establishing that officials concealed an extraterrestrial discovery.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects25 Jun 2024 — From 1947 to 1969, a total of 12, 618 sightings were report…
What Project Blue Book recorded in Pennsylvania
Project Blue Book was the Air Force’s principal public UFO investigation programme from 1952 until December 1969, following the earlier Project Sign and Project Grudge. Its two broad purposes were to assess whether sightings represented a national-security threat and to analyse reports that could not immediately be identified. Nationally, the programme received 12,618 reports and classified 701 as unidentified when it closed. “Unidentified” meant that the available evidence did not support a satisfactory explanation; it did not amount to an official judgement that a spacecraft of unknown origin had been observed.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects25 Jun 2024 — From 1947 to 1969, a total of 12, 618 sightings were report…
The surviving Blue Book archive includes individual case files, administrative material and related investigative records. A typical file might contain a reporting form, a witness interview, a sketch, correspondence with a police department or Air Force base, weather and astronomical checks, newspaper coverage and a final classification. Some files are substantial, while others consist of only a few pages. This unevenness matters because a case recorded as “unidentified” may reflect genuinely puzzling evidence, but it may also reflect missing measurements, delayed reporting or an investigation that stopped before a likely explanation could be demonstrated.[Forces War Records]uk.forceswarrecords.comForces War RecordsUS, Project Blue Book - UFO Investigations, 1947-196926 Feb 2007 — Each case file relates to one sighting or to a group…
Pennsylvania was well placed to generate Blue Book reports. It had major cities, military and industrial sites, busy air routes and large rural areas, while Blue Book’s headquarters at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base lay nearby in Ohio. Reports could reach the Air Force through military channels, local police, airports, newspapers or witnesses writing directly to officials. The archive consequently preserves not a scientifically selected sample of everything seen over Pennsylvania, but what people chose to report and what agencies decided to pass onwards.
Presque Isle and the value of a complete case file
One of the best-known Pennsylvania entries concerns an encounter reported at Presque Isle State Park near Erie in 1966. The Blue Book archive contains a dedicated case file for the location, illustrating how a local sighting could move into the federal system. Such files are valuable because they preserve descriptions close to the time of the event, before decades of retelling reshape the story.[Fold3]fold3.comPresque Isle State Park, Pennsylvania (#[Blank])26 Feb 2007 — Project Blue Book - UFO Investigations, 1947-1969. Records and case fi…
Even so, an official file does not automatically settle what happened. Investigators depended heavily on witness estimates of distance, height, size and speed, all of which are difficult to judge against a dark or featureless sky. A light that seems low, large and fast may be far away, small and slow. Unless a report includes independent radar data, photographs with usable reference points, physical traces or observations from separated locations, the paperwork may document sincere testimony without supplying enough information to reconstruct the event reliably.
That distinction is central to reading Pennsylvania’s Blue Book material. The archive is strongest at showing what witnesses said, which agencies became involved and how the Air Force classified the report. It is often much weaker at proving the physical characteristics of the object itself.
Police reports carried weight, but not certainty
Police officers occupy a prominent place in Pennsylvania UFO history because their reports were more likely than ordinary civilian accounts to be formally written down, circulated through official channels and taken seriously by newspapers. Officers were accustomed to recording times, locations and sequences of events, and several Pennsylvania cases involved patrols responding to calls or observing unusual lights themselves.
Their professional status improves the documentary trail, but it does not remove the ordinary limits of night-sky observation. Police officers are trained to observe people, vehicles and incidents on the ground, not necessarily to identify distant astronomical or aerial lights. A disciplined report can therefore be credible as testimony while still being mistaken about an object’s distance or nature.
This becomes especially important in multi-agency incidents. A report may begin with one witness, pass through a local dispatcher, bring several patrol cars to the area and eventually reach the military. The number of participating officers can make the event appear independently corroborated even when most responders are following the same reported light or receiving the same information over the radio. The records must be read carefully to distinguish separate observations from repeated descriptions of one original claim.
Police documentation also tended to remain local. Incident logs, dispatch tapes, handwritten notebooks and departmental reports were not necessarily forwarded to Blue Book, and retention policies varied between departments. As a result, the federal archive cannot be assumed to contain every police-related Pennsylvania sighting. Conversely, the presence of a local police report proves that an event was reported and investigated, not that the object was extraordinary.
Military records were shaped by security priorities
The Air Force did not investigate UFO reports solely as a scientific puzzle. During the Cold War, unidentified aircraft, balloons or electronic activity could indicate foreign surveillance, an air-defence problem or public exposure of a classified American programme. That security setting affected both what investigators checked and what could be openly discussed.
Declassified material shows that Blue Book investigators sometimes consulted the Central Intelligence Agency about whether sightings coincided with U-2 reconnaissance flights. Classified aircraft operating at unusual heights could look unfamiliar, particularly around sunrise or sunset when an aircraft remained illuminated after the ground below had darkened. Officials could close or redirect such investigations without revealing the sensitive activity behind the sighting.[CIA]cia.govU-2S, UFOS, AND OPERATION BLUE BOOKBLUE BOOK investigators regularly called on the Agency's Project Staff in Washington to check repor…
This historical secrecy is often treated as evidence that all unexplained reports concealed advanced technology. The records support a narrower conclusion: some UFO reports were connected with secret American aviation, and public explanations were not always complete at the time. They do not show that every incomplete Pennsylvania file involved a classified aircraft, still less a non-human craft.
Jurisdiction was also divided. The Air Force was the principal agency responsible for UFO evaluation, while the Federal Bureau of Investigation generally treated the subject as an Air Force matter unless a report touched on espionage, sabotage, recovered material or another FBI responsibility. The FBI’s released files consequently document correspondence and institutional interest rather than a separate, comprehensive Pennsylvania investigation programme.[FBI]fbi.govOpen source on fbi.gov.
This division helps explain apparently contradictory official responses. Local police might secure an area, military personnel might check for fallen equipment, and federal agencies might exchange messages without any one organisation conducting a full scientific investigation. Later researchers can mistake the presence of several agencies for proof of a major secret operation when it may instead reflect uncertainty over responsibility.
Kecksburg shows what records can — and cannot — prove
The 9 December 1965 Kecksburg incident is Pennsylvania’s most important dispute over official UFO records. A brilliant fireball was seen across a wide region of the United States and Canada. In and around Kecksburg, witnesses reported that something appeared to descend towards woodland, while later accounts described police and military activity, a cordoned area and the removal of an object. The central documentary question is not whether a bright object crossed the sky — that is well established — but whether official records confirm that something landed and was recovered near the village.
The record is fragmented. Contemporary press reports and witness accounts indicate that Pennsylvania State Police and military personnel responded to the area. However, the surviving publicly available federal material has not produced an unambiguous recovery report, inventory, photograph or transportation order identifying a retrieved object. That absence does not prove that no operation occurred, but it leaves the strongest recovery claims dependent largely on testimony rather than a complete chain of official documentation.
Kecksburg was not treated as one of Blue Book’s 701 nationally unidentified cases in the simple way often implied in popular accounts. The Air Force associated the widespread reports with a meteor or fireball. The dispute developed because this astronomical explanation addressed the object seen crossing the region but did not satisfy witnesses who believed a separate object had come down in the woods.
The distinction matters. A meteor explanation can account for the bright atmospheric display without automatically explaining every local report of smoke, impacts, lights or military movement. Equally, local reports do not by themselves prove that the fireball deposited a manufactured object at Kecksburg. Several observations made at different distances and times may have been combined into a single crash narrative after the event.
The NASA records dispute
Decades later, Kecksburg became a test of the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, the federal law that allows the public to request government records. Journalist Leslie Kean sought NASA documents relating to the incident and challenged the adequacy of the agency’s search. In 2007, after judicial criticism of NASA’s earlier response, the agency agreed to conduct a broader search and pay legal costs.[rcfp.org]rcfp.orgjudge forces nasa take giant leap foia suitJudge forces NASA to take a giant leap in FOIA suit10 Dec 2007 — NASA agreed to extensively search for the requested records and pay $50…
The litigation was significant because it forced an examination of how the agency searched its files. It did not result in a court finding that NASA had recovered a UFO or deliberately hidden proof of one. The eventual search, completed under court supervision, produced additional material but no decisive document establishing the recovery of an unusual craft at Kecksburg. Contemporary reporting on the conclusion described the result as lacking a documentary “smoking gun”.[Space]space.com7589 case finally closed 1965 pennsylvania ufo mystery7589 case finally closed 1965 pennsylvania ufo mystery
NASA’s changing public statements nevertheless damaged confidence. At one point the agency said that experts had examined fragments associated with the event and identified them as Soviet satellite material, while also stating that relevant records had been lost. Missing boxes and uncertain archival trails became part of the dispute. Because the underlying analysis could not be produced in full, the satellite-fragment claim could not be independently tested from the documentary record available to the public.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKecksburg UFO incidentKecksburg UFO incident
This is an important example of the difference between an evidential gap and positive evidence of concealment. Poor record retention, inconsistent searches and contradictory public statements reasonably invite criticism. They may prevent a confident reconstruction of events. They do not, without further documentation, establish what the missing papers contained.
The lawsuit therefore strengthened the case that NASA’s earlier records search had been inadequate. It did not strengthen the physical case for an extraterrestrial object. What emerged most clearly was an archival failure: decades after the incident, the agency could not provide a complete, coherent account of what records had once existed or what had happened to all of them.
Why “missing files” require careful interpretation
Missing records are one of the most persistent themes in Pennsylvania UFO claims, but several different situations are often grouped together under that phrase.
A record may never have been created. A telephone call, informal briefing or short field visit might leave no permanent paperwork, particularly if officials quickly decided that an incident posed no threat.
A document may have remained in local custody. Police logs, fire-department records and county emergency communications were not automatically transferred into federal UFO archives.
A file may have been destroyed under routine schedules. Agencies routinely dispose of administrative records after specified periods. This may be poor practice from a historical perspective without being evidence of targeted suppression.
A record may be misfiled or badly indexed. Older agency files were organised by office, project, date or record series rather than by the modern search terms a requester is likely to use.
Material may be withheld or redacted. National-security, law-enforcement and privacy exemptions can restrict access. Blue Book’s public files also protect personal information relating to witnesses. Redaction may make it difficult to connect statements across different records, but it serves legal privacy requirements as well as secrecy concerns.[Pieces of History]prologue.blogs.archives.govPieces of History INVASION! (of privacyPieces of History INVASION! (of privacy
These possibilities have different implications. A documented destruction notice is not the same as an agency denying that a file existed. An unanswered request is not the same as a confirmed withholding. Claims of missing Pennsylvania UFO records are strongest when supported by a catalogue reference, transfer list, correspondence mentioning a specific enclosure or testimony from a records officer. They are weakest when based only on the expectation that a dramatic event must have produced extensive files.
Private investigators filled the official gaps
After Blue Book closed, Pennsylvania reports did not stop, but the federal government no longer maintained the same public case-processing system. Much of the state’s later UFO history was recorded by civilian groups, local researchers, journalists and reporting centres rather than by a single government programme.
These private archives are especially important for the western Pennsylvania sighting wave of 1973 and for later witness follow-ups connected with Kecksburg. Investigators gathered interview notes, drawings, newspaper reports and accounts from police officers or residents who had never made a formal federal report. In some cases, civilian researchers preserved material that might otherwise have disappeared.
Their records must nevertheless be assessed differently from official files. Methods varied, interviews were not always recorded, and investigators sometimes approached witnesses years after an event had entered popular culture. A file may mix a contemporary statement with later recollections, rumours and interpretations. The mere accumulation of documents can make a case seem well corroborated even when later accounts are derived from the same original story.
Official and private records are therefore most useful when they can be compared. A contemporary police log may confirm the timing of a call; a newspaper report may identify who was present; a Blue Book file may show what the Air Force checked; and a later interview may add detail. Where the accounts agree independently, confidence increases. Where descriptions become more elaborate over time, the later additions deserve caution.
How Blue Book classifications should be read
Project Blue Book used categories such as aircraft, balloon, astronomical, insufficient data and unidentified. These labels look definitive, but they reflect the standards, resources and institutional priorities of the programme at the time.
An “identified” case may rest on a persuasive match with a planet, meteor, aircraft or balloon. In other cases, the explanation was tentative: investigators selected the most likely conventional object even when they could not reproduce every reported detail. Critics of Blue Book argued that some conclusions were reached too quickly or were framed to reduce public concern.
An “unidentified” classification is equally easy to overstate. It means investigators did not find a satisfactory identification from the information available. It does not certify that the witness’s estimates were accurate or that the object displayed impossible capabilities. A report can remain unidentified because the observation was too brief, the direction was uncertain, no radar record survived or investigators received the report too late to check aircraft and weather data properly.
“Insufficient information” is often the most revealing category. It acknowledges that the case cannot responsibly be decided. For readers examining Pennsylvania reports, this is a more useful distinction than a simple split between “explained” and “mysterious”. Some files contain enough evidence for a strong conventional explanation; others preserve an interesting but untestable story; a smaller number remain genuinely unresolved after reasonable checks.
What the surviving records establish
Pennsylvania’s official UFO files support several firm conclusions.
First, state sightings were taken seriously enough to generate police responses, military enquiries and federal case files. Officials did not simply ignore every report. Their first concern, however, was generally air safety and national security rather than the search for extraterrestrial life.
Second, many reports were assessed through ordinary checks: astronomical positions, aircraft movements, weather conditions, balloons, meteors and military activity. The government’s own historical summaries state that the great majority of Blue Book cases received conventional explanations and that no investigated sighting was found to threaten national security or demonstrate extraterrestrial technology.[National Archives]archives.govnr20 19nr20 19
Third, the documentary system was incomplete. Blue Book did not receive every Pennsylvania report, investigations varied in depth, and the programme’s closure created a sharp break in the federal public record after 1969. Later state sightings appear mainly in local, private or national civilian databases rather than one authoritative government collection.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects25 Jun 2024 — From 1947 to 1969, a total of 12, 618 sightings were report…
Finally, official incompleteness is most consequential at Kecksburg. The records confirm a major fireball and an official response, but they do not provide a complete documentary chain proving either the recovery of an extraordinary object or the absence of all activity described by witnesses. The later FOIA case exposed weaknesses in NASA’s records search and retention, while failing to uncover decisive evidence of a concealed craft.
The clearest reading of Pennsylvania’s record
Pennsylvania’s official UFO archive is best understood as a record of reports, institutional decisions and evidential limitations. It shows how unusual observations moved from witnesses to police dispatchers, military offices and federal investigators; how officials balanced public explanation with security concerns; and how classifications could become more certain on paper than the underlying evidence justified.
The files weaken claims that every Pennsylvania UFO incident was ignored or erased. Thousands of pages survived, and named cases can be traced through federal archives. They also weaken the opposite claim that official explanations settled every event conclusively. Some investigations were brief, some relied on uncertain witness estimates, and some potentially relevant records were never retained or cannot now be located.
What the archive does not reveal is verified evidence of non-human technology. Its enduring value lies elsewhere: it allows readers to separate contemporary documentation from later folklore, distinguish an unresolved observation from a proven extraordinary event, and see why incomplete governance records can keep a mystery alive long after the original sighting has passed.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Do Pennsylvania's Official UFO Records Reveal?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Directly addresses official Air Force UFO investigations.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Examines official evidence and credible witnesses.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromProject Blue Book poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects25 Jun 2024 — From 1947 to 1969, a total of 12, 618 sightings were report...
2.
Source: rcfp.org
Title: judge forces nasa take giant leap foia suit
Link:https://www.rcfp.org/judge-forces-nasa-take-giant-leap-foia-suit/
Source snippet
Judge forces NASA to take a giant leap in FOIA suit10 Dec 2007 — NASA agreed to extensively search for the requested records and pay $50...
3.
Source: fold3.com
Link:https://www.fold3.com/document/8725460/presque-isle-state-park-pennsylvania-blank-page-113-us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations
Source snippet
Presque Isle State Park, Pennsylvania (#[Blank])26 Feb 2007 — Project Blue Book - UFO Investigations, 1947-1969. Records and case fi...
4.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp80b01676r004000110001-7
Source snippet
U-2S, UFOS, AND OPERATION BLUE BOOKBLUE BOOK investigators regularly called on the Agency's Project Staff in Washington to check repor...
5.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80B01676R004000110001-7.pdf
Source snippet
U-2S, UFOS, AND OPERATION BLUE BOOKBLUE BOOK investigators regularly called on the. Agency's Project Staff in Washington to check repo...
6.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000838058.pdf
7.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/inside-the-fbi-ufos-102921.mp4/view
8.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Project%20Blue%20Book%20%28UFO%29%20
9.
Source: space.com
Title: 7589 case finally closed 1965 pennsylvania ufo mystery
Link:https://www.space.com/7589-case-finally-closed-1965-pennsylvania-ufo-mystery.html
10.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Kecksburg UFO incident
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kecksburg_UFO_incident
11.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: Pieces of History INVASION! (of privacy)
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/09/invasion-of-privacy/
12.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: nr20 19
Link:https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2020/nr20-19
14.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: Pieces of History UFOs: Man-Made, Made Up, and Unknown
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/23/ufos-man-made-made-up-and-unknown/
15.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: saucers over washington the history of project blue book
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/12/19/saucers-over-washington-the-history-of-project-blue-book/
16.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: ufos natural explanations
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/16/ufos-natural-explanations/
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: presidential libraries
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/presidential-libraries
18.
Source: archives.gov
Title: do records show proof of ufos
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
19.
Source: catalog.archives.gov
Link:https://catalog.archives.gov/
20.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Requests Report The date range for these records should be from
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2021_agency_foia_log_0.xlsx
21.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/fy_2009_report-2_tagged.pdf
22.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/foia/nasa-e-libraries/headquarters-foia-library/
23.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=FBI&b_start%3Aint=120
24.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: reading room index
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/reading-room-index
25.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=alien
26.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=blue+book&=&b_start%3Aint=270
27.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/sitemap
28.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/
29.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: november 1967
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/november-1967.pdf
Published: november 1967
30.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: february 1975
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/february-1975.pdf
Published: february 1975
31.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: november 1940
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/november-1940.pdf
Published: november 1940
32.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: National Rail
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rail
33.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100060001-5.pdf
34.
Source: cia.gov
Title: CIA RDP81R00560R000100010001 0
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010001-0.pdf
35.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100010002-9
36.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP75-00149R000500070003-0.pdf
37.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0005517742
38.
Source: cia.gov
Title: DOC 0005517565
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005517565.pdf
39.
Source: cia.gov
Title: how to investigate a flying saucer
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/how-to-investigate-a-flying-saucer/
40.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010002-9.pdf
41.
Source: rcfp.org
Title: nasa ordered review its records data ufo sighting
Link:https://www.rcfp.org/nasa-ordered-review-its-records-data-ufo-sighting/
42.
Source: uk.forceswarrecords.com
Link:https://uk.forceswarrecords.com/publication/461/us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations
Source snippet
Forces War RecordsUS, Project Blue Book - UFO Investigations, 1947-196926 Feb 2007 — Each case file relates to one sighting or to a group...
43.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/nov/11/spaceexploration.usa
44.
Source: spacelaw.univie.ac.at
Title: univie.ac.at Outer Space, Liability for Damage
Link:https://spacelaw.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_spacelaw/EPIL_Outer_Space__Liability_for_Damages.pdf
45.
Source: dictionary.cambridge.org
Link:https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/national
Additional References
46.
Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104590/unidentified-flying-objects-and-air-force-project-blue-book/
Source snippet
U.S. Air ForceUnidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue BookOf a total of 12,618 sightings reported to Project Blue Book, 70...
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVKP6SdGaD0
Source snippet
[Carbondale]({{ 'carbondale/' | relative_url }}) Pennsylvania UFO lantern 1974 WVIA Did Aliens Really Visit This Small Town in 1974?...
48.
Source: nationalrail.com
Link:https://www.nationalrail.com/
49.
Source: national-lottery.co.uk
Link:https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/my-account
50.
Source: merriam-webster.com
Link:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/national
51.
Source: nationalexpress.com
Link:https://www.nationalexpress.com/en
52.
Source: nationalrail.co.uk
Link:https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/
53.
Source: positivelypittsburgh.com
Link:https://positivelypittsburgh.com/the-kecksburg-ufo-incident/
54.
Source: national-lottery.co.uk
Link:https://www.national-lottery.co.uk/
55.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/DarrellCraigHarrisbass/posts/the-truth-about-project-blue-book-and-ufos-/1649140340551602/