Within Colorado
What Colorado's Military Skies Can Really Tell US
Colorado's defence sites and busy airspace create both credible trained witnesses and many ordinary sources of unfamiliar aerial lights.
On this page
- NORAD, defence facilities and public expectations
- Pilots, military observers and law enforcement reports
- Radar limits, aircraft traffic and missing sensor evidence
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Colorado’s military skies matter to UFO history because the state combines unusually watchful institutions with unusually complicated airspace. NORAD is headquartered in Colorado Springs, major Space Force installations surround the city, military aircraft train along the Front Range, and Denver’s aviation system handles dense commercial and general-aviation traffic. These conditions produce credible observers, but they also produce many unfamiliar lights, aircraft movements, drones and restricted operations that can be misidentified.
The central finding is less dramatic than Colorado’s defence reputation suggests. Public records contain sincere reports from pilots, military personnel and law-enforcement officers, yet few Colorado cases include the radar plots, calibrated imagery, flight records and simultaneous observations needed to demonstrate extraordinary performance. Even the state’s large “mystery drone” episode of 2019–20 generated extensive official attention without producing a confirmed operator or compelling evidence of exotic craft. Colorado therefore shows both the value and the limits of trained witnesses: experience can improve a report, but it cannot replace missing measurements.
Why NORAD changes public expectations
The North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, is closely associated with Colorado Springs. Its mission includes aerospace warning and aerospace control, using information from satellites, ground-based radar, airborne radar and fighter aircraft to detect and assess potential threats to North America. Cheyenne Mountain historically housed major command centres supporting warning of aircraft and ballistic-missile attacks, although the complex now serves alongside other command facilities rather than functioning as a magical all-seeing eye.[NORAD]norad.milAbout NORADTo accomplish the aerospace control mission, NORAD uses a network of satellites, ground-based radar, airborne radar and f…
This creates a persistent public assumption: if an unusual object appears over Colorado, NORAD must have tracked it. That does not follow. NORAD’s sensors and procedures are designed around defence missions, not the scientific recording of every light, drone, balloon or ambiguous radar return seen within the state. A system optimised to identify aircraft approaching North America may filter, deprioritise or never encounter a small object flying at low altitude over eastern Colorado.
Colorado Springs itself contains a particularly dense mixture of activity. Peterson Space Force Base supports national-security, space-operations and homeland-defence missions, while Schriever Space Force Base hosts satellite-control and other space units east of the city. The region also includes military airlift, training flights, helicopters, commercial services and private aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration describes Colorado Springs Airport as handling fast-moving military aircraft alongside airlines, medevac helicopters, general aviation and flight-school traffic.[spaceforce.mil]ussf-cfc.spaceforce.milSpace Base Delta 1 - USSF Combat Forces CommandSpace Base Delta 1, (SBD 1), is headquartered at Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado…
That mixture makes the area productive for reports of lights that appear to hover, accelerate or change direction. A distant aircraft turning towards an observer can suddenly brighten as its landing lights become visible. The same aircraft may then seem to vanish when it turns away. Helicopters can remain almost stationary, while military traffic may follow routes or operating patterns unfamiliar to residents. Satellites and bright planets add further confusion, especially when witnesses judge motion against sparse nighttime backgrounds.
NORAD’s presence is still relevant. It means that genuinely threatening or conspicuous incursions may attract rapid professional attention. It also means that military personnel living around Colorado Springs may recognise common aircraft more readily than the average witness. What it does not mean is that every unexplained observation has a retrievable NORAD radar record.
What trained observers add — and what they cannot
Pilots, air-traffic controllers, police officers and military personnel are often treated as ideal UFO witnesses. Their reports deserve attention because they may include disciplined descriptions of direction, duration, apparent altitude, navigation lights and nearby traffic. A pilot may also know whether an object behaved unlike the aircraft types normally encountered in that airspace.
Yet aviation experience is specialised rather than universal. A fighter pilot may be highly skilled at recognising another aircraft at operational range but still have difficulty estimating the size of a light with no visible background. A sheriff’s deputy may report positions and times carefully while lacking the equipment to determine whether several lights belong to separate drones, one distant aircraft or objects at very different distances.
Three recurring uncertainties affect even strong witnesses:
- Distance cannot be seen directly. Without a known size, an object that appears large and distant may instead be small and nearby.
- Apparent speed depends on range. A light crossing part of the sky rapidly may be moving at ordinary speed close to the observer.
- Night observations remove visual reference points. A stationary light may appear to wander through the autokinetic effect, while the observer’s own vehicle or aircraft motion can create misleading relative movement.
These limitations do not imply that trained witnesses are unreliable. They explain why witness credentials should be treated as one part of the evidence rather than as proof of the object’s nature. Modern official reviews have reached much the same conclusion. The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, has repeatedly noted that many reports remain unresolved because basic quantities such as range, altitude and velocity were not captured, even when military sensors or personnel were involved.[aaro.mil]aaro.milAAR O_Historical_Record_ReporAARO_Historical_Record_Repor…March 8, 2024 — 6 Mar 2024 — Insufficient data and information was compounded by inconsistent reporting an…
A useful Colorado report would therefore contain more than an impressive job title. Investigators would want a precise time and location, the observer’s heading and movement, weather and astronomical conditions, air-traffic data, photographs in their original format and independent sensor records. Reports become substantially stronger when several sources can be aligned on the same timeline.
The eastern Colorado drone mystery
The most revealing modern aviation episode began in December 2019, when residents and sheriff’s departments across north-eastern Colorado reported groups of large drones or drone-like lights operating after dark. Reports spread into neighbouring Nebraska and Kansas. Phillips County Sheriff Thomas Elliott described as many as 17 objects, said to have wingspans of roughly six feet, flying grid-like patterns during evening hours.[Colorado Public Radio]cpr.orgColorado Public RadioThe FAA Is Now Investigating Colorado's Mysterious Drones31 Dec 2019 — Phillips County Sheriff Thomas Elliott told C…
The episode mattered because it included more than anonymous internet submissions. Sheriff’s deputies attempted to observe and track the lights, residents reported repeated activity, and aviation authorities treated the reports seriously. In January 2020, dozens of representatives from local, state, federal and military organisations attended a closed meeting in Brush, Colorado. The FAA, FBI and military offices made enquiries, while officials contacted airports, drone companies, test sites and government agencies that might have been conducting authorised operations.[abcnews.com]abcnews.comABC News New drone task force investigating mysterious sightingsABC News New drone task force investigating mysterious sightings
The first popular explanation was a covert military exercise, partly because the sightings occurred near a region containing strategic missile fields and military infrastructure. Released FAA records, however, reportedly expressed high confidence that the activity was not a secret military operation. Officials also checked with NORAD and several Pentagon offices without identifying a responsible programme.[KUNC]kunc.orgdocuments indicate how little officials knew about mysterious drones last yeardocuments indicate how little officials knew about mysterious drones last year
That finding did not establish that every reported object was a drone. As public attention increased, reports multiplied across a wide area, and investigators faced the familiar problem of combining observations that may not have shared one cause. Some witnesses probably saw ordinary aircraft, stars or hobby drones after becoming alert to anything unusual in the sky. Other descriptions, particularly repeated grid-like movements reported by law enforcement, remained more difficult to dismiss.
The case eventually faded without a confirmed fleet being recovered, photographed clearly or linked to an operator. This outcome supports two competing interpretations.
One is that a real but conventional drone operation occurred and its owner was never publicly identified. Surveying, agricultural imaging, infrastructure inspection and commercial testing can all involve repeated flight patterns, although coordinated night flights and large operating areas would raise regulatory questions.
The other is that the “fleet” was partly constructed from unrelated observations. Once news reports established the expectation of large drones, distant aircraft lights could be grouped into a single developing story. The absence of recovered hardware, clear close-range photographs or decisive radar evidence makes it difficult to determine how many genuine drones were present.
The sensible classification is therefore unresolved but not evidentially extraordinary. The episode demonstrates a genuine gap in low-altitude airspace awareness and public identification of drone operators. It does not provide persuasive evidence of vehicles displaying technology beyond known aviation.
Why radar did not settle the case
Radar is often imagined as an objective answer to disputed sightings, but “seen on radar” can describe very different levels of evidence. A complete record might include raw sensor data, target range, altitude, speed, heading, signal strength and confirmation from another radar. A weaker claim may be based only on an operator remembering an unusual return.
Different radar systems also serve different purposes. Air-traffic-control radar is designed to manage aircraft safely, while military networks prioritise recognised threat profiles. Weather radar detects precipitation and can also register birds, insects, debris or other unwanted returns. Small drones are particularly difficult because they may fly low, move slowly, have limited radar-reflecting surfaces and become lost among ground clutter.
Coverage is not uniform. The FAA notes, for example, that controllers at Northern Colorado Regional Airport may sometimes rely on pilot position reports and visual observation rather than radar for local sequencing. Elsewhere, terrain, antenna placement and operating altitude can affect whether a target is visible.[Federal Aviation Administration]faa.govOpen source on faa.gov.
Radar software also filters data. Without filtering, operators would face overwhelming numbers of returns from birds, vehicles, weather and electronic noise. A filter that removes slow or weak targets may also remove a small drone. Conversely, an unfiltered or poorly interpreted return can appear more significant than it is.
This is why the absence of a publicly released radar track does not prove that witnesses saw nothing. It also means that a vague claim of military radar confirmation should not be accepted without the underlying record. AARO’s assessments identify insufficient radar, infrared and optical data, sensor artefacts and parallax as recurring obstacles to resolving reports. Its judgement is that improved data would probably allow many apparently anomalous cases to be identified as ordinary phenomena.[aaro.mil]aaro.milUNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP OctUNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct
Colorado’s crowded airspace creates convincing mistakes
Colorado’s aviation geography is unusually favourable to misidentification. Denver International Airport handles traffic arriving from several directions, while Centennial, Rocky Mountain Metropolitan and other airports add private, training and business flights. Buckley Space Force Base lies close to Denver-area civil airspace, and the FAA specifically warns pilots near Centennial Airport about nearby military and helicopter traffic.[Federal Aviation Administration]faa.govOpen source on faa.gov.
South of Denver, aircraft move between Colorado Springs, Pueblo and military training areas. An FAA guide to the Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center describes substantial special-use airspace in the sector serving Colorado Springs and Pueblo, including areas used to train military pilots.[Federal Aviation Administration]faa.gov2019 ZDV Facility Guide2019 ZDV Facility Guide
Several ordinary operations can look extraordinary from the ground:
Aircraft seen head-on. A bright landing light can appear stationary for minutes. When the aircraft turns, the light may dim abruptly, creating the impression that an object disappeared.
Formation or circuit flying. Training aircraft following similar routes can produce repeated lights at regular intervals. From a distance, separate aircraft may seem to be moving as a rigid formation.
Aerial refuelling and military exercises. Two aircraft operating close together can appear as one object that divides, changes shape or carries unusual lights.
Helicopters and medevac flights. Their ability to hover or move slowly distinguishes them from fixed-wing aircraft but can also make their range difficult to judge.
Firefighting aircraft. Colorado’s military and civilian aviation systems support major wildfire operations. Peterson-based C-130 aircraft, for example, can participate in aerial firefighting missions, bringing large aircraft into areas where residents may not normally expect them.[petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil]petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil302d Airlift Wing302d Airlift Wing
Drones. Consumer and commercial drones can hover, fly programmed grids and carry lights that obscure their shape. At night, even a modest drone may be mistaken for a larger object because the witness cannot determine its distance.
These explanations should not be applied automatically. Their value is that each makes testable predictions. An aircraft hypothesis can be checked against route and transponder records; a planet against astronomical position; a drone against weather, battery duration, local operators and remote-identification data. A responsible investigation asks which explanation best fits the whole report rather than choosing “UFO” or “aircraft” in advance.
Military secrecy is a complication, not an explanation
Colorado’s defence installations naturally encourage speculation about classified aircraft. Historically, secret aviation programmes have contributed to UFO reports elsewhere in the United States, and military authorities cannot always discuss capabilities or exercises publicly. It is therefore reasonable to consider whether a report might involve restricted activity.
The problem is that “classified aircraft” can become an explanation that is impossible to test. It may be used by sceptics to dismiss any unusual sighting, or by enthusiasts to suggest that officials know far more than they admit. Neither position is supported simply by the presence of a base.
A classified-flight explanation becomes stronger when the location, timing and observed behaviour match known testing or training practices. It becomes weaker when the reported object supposedly performs in ways unnecessary for an aircraft programme, appears repeatedly over populated areas or remains visible long enough to create avoidable public attention.
The 2019–20 drone investigation is instructive because agencies did ask whether military activity was responsible. The available records point away from that explanation rather than towards it. That does not identify the objects, but it shows that invoking secrecy without evidence can obscure rather than solve a case.[KUNC]kunc.orgdocuments indicate how little officials knew about mysterious drones last yeardocuments indicate how little officials knew about mysterious drones last year
What would make a Colorado radar or pilot case persuasive?
The strongest future case would combine independent evidence rather than relying on a single striking account. Ideally, it would include:
- Contemporaneous reporting, made before extensive media coverage could influence descriptions.
- Several independent observers, separated enough to permit triangulation.
- Original sensor records, not summaries or recollections of what a radar screen supposedly showed.
- Civil and military flight checks, including transponder, air-traffic and special-use-airspace information.
- Calibrated imagery, preserving metadata, focal length and an unedited sequence before and after the observation.
- Measured behaviour, showing acceleration or speed only after distance and viewing geometry have been established.
- A documented chain of custody, so that investigators know where every recording came from and whether it was altered.
Colorado is well placed to produce such evidence because it contains extensive aerospace expertise and numerous monitoring systems. Paradoxically, its history shows how rarely all those elements come together. Defence sensors may be classified, civil radar may not retain the necessary detail, witnesses may report an event days later, and agencies may hold separate pieces of information that are never integrated.
What Colorado’s military skies really tell us
Colorado’s defence presence gives UFO reports a distinctive setting, but not an automatic stamp of authenticity. NORAD and the Space Force make the state central to North American aerospace operations, while military, commercial and private flights create a dense and visually confusing sky. Trained observers can supply valuable detail, yet they remain subject to uncertain distance, poor nighttime reference points and incomplete sensor coverage.
The eastern Colorado drone reports show the pattern clearly. Authorities collected credible testimony, consulted NORAD and other military organisations, and organised a substantial multi-agency response. They still failed to identify a single operator or produce decisive physical and sensor evidence. Later document releases strengthened the conclusion that officials were genuinely uncertain, but weakened speculation that a covert military project had been confirmed.
The fairest reading is neither that Colorado’s military witnesses have proved extraordinary craft nor that every unexplained report is trivial. Some observations remain unresolved because the right data were never captured. In the state’s UFO history, the most important divide is therefore not between believers and sceptics. It is between cases supported by measurable, cross-checked records and cases that remain compelling stories without enough information to determine what flew through Colorado’s crowded skies.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Colorado's Military Skies Can Really Tell US. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Focuses on pilot and military witness testimony.
Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Milita...
Explores secret aerospace programmes often linked to UFO claims.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Discusses evidence standards for aerial mysteries.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromaircraft display model oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/About-NORAD/
Source snippet
About NORADTo accomplish the aerospace control mission, NORAD uses a network of satellites, ground-based radar, airborne radar and f...
2.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Fact-Sheets/Article-View/Article/578775/cheyenne-mountain-complex/
Source snippet
Cheyenne Mountain ComplexColorado Springs, Colorado. several centers supported the NORAD missions of aerospace warning and aerospace...
3.
Source: ussf-cfc.spaceforce.mil
Link:https://www.ussf-cfc.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/2401936/space-base-delta-1
Source snippet
Space Base Delta 1 - USSF Combat Forces CommandSpace Base Delta 1, (SBD 1), is headquartered at Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado...
4.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/SpaceBaseDelta41/
Source snippet
9-567-5620. Call 719-567-5620 to confirm...
5.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/flight_deck/cos
Source snippet
Federal Aviation AdministrationCity of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport (COS)8 Jun 2026 — KCOS has a diverse mix of traffic with fast-m...
6.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O_Historical_Record_Repor
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf
Source snippet
AARO_Historical_Record_Repor...March 8, 2024 — 6 Mar 2024 — Insufficient data and information was compounded by inconsistent reporting an...
Published: March 8, 2024
7.
Source: time.com
Link:https://time.com/5757819/drones-colorado-nebraska/
8.
Source: 9news.com
Link:https://www.9news.com/article/news/local/colorado-drones-faa-task-force-meeting/73-059fd156-ec27-4a36-8bb6-717b2e70d5c6
9.
Source: kunc.org
Title: documents indicate how little officials knew about mysterious drones last year
Link:https://www.kunc.org/news/2021-07-25/documents-indicate-how-little-officials-knew-about-mysterious-drones-last-year
10.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/domesticnotices/dom22011_sw.html
11.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf
12.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/flight_deck/apa
13.
Source: faa.gov
Title: 2019 ZDV Facility Guide
Link:https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/2019_ZDV_Facility_Guide.pdf
14.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Title: 302d Airlift Wing
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/302d-Airlift-Wing/
15.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/
16.
Source: buckley.spaceforce.mil
Title: buckley air force base heritage
Link:https://www.buckley.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Article/322400/buckley-air-force-base-heritage/
17.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Title: mil Schriever SFB, Colorado
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/schriever-sfb-colorado/
18.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Title: mil Public Affairs
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/Public-Affairs/
19.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Title: mil AFSP C brings the heat
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/Newsroom/News/Display/Article/1365067/afspc-brings-the-heat/
20.
Source: petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil
Link:https://www.petersonschriever.spaceforce.mil/Newsroom/News/Display/Article/4390558/space-warfighting-heritage-the-original-space-wings/
21.
Source: ussf-cfc.spaceforce.mil
Title: mil Colonel RAMSEY M. HORN
Link:https://www.ussf-cfc.spaceforce.mil/Biographies/Display/Article/3899956/ramsey-m-horn
22.
Source: faa.gov
Title: afn afn 20231129 fy22 may22 sept22.xlsx
Link:https://www.faa.gov/foia/electronic_reading_room/logs/afn-afn-20231129-fy22-may22-sept22.xlsx
23.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-09/fy20-oct19-apr20.xlsx
24.
Source: faa.gov
Title: afn afn 20250303 fy24 oct23 mar24.xlsx
Link:https://www.faa.gov/foia/electronic_reading_room/logs/afn-afn-20250303-fy24-oct23-mar24.xlsx
25.
Source: faa.gov
Title: afn afn 20250801 fy25 oct24 dec24.xlsx
Link:https://www.faa.gov/foia/electronic_reading_room/logs/afn-afn-20250801-fy25-oct24-dec24.xlsx
26.
Source: sua.faa.gov
Link:https://sua.faa.gov/
27.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/domesticnotices/
28.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/environmental_issues_OLD
29.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/field_offices/fsdo/den
30.
Source: faa.gov
Link:https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/statements/general-statements
31.
Source: aeronav.faa.gov
Title: govvfr terminal area chart
Link:https://aeronav.faa.gov/visual/05-14-2026/PDFs/Salt_Lake_City_TAC.pdf
32.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/sitemap.xml.gz
33.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/atom.xml
34.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights
35.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases
36.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/transnational-organized-crime/news
37.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: enforcing the laws of wildlife and recreation part two
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/enforcing-the-laws-of-wildlife-and-recreation-part-two
38.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: manhunts a role for crisis negotiators
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/manhunts-a-role-for-crisis-negotiators
39.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: building better candidates through technical high schools
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/building-better-candidates-through-technical-high-schools
40.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: law enforcement organizations possibilities and challenges for the future
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/law-enforcement-organizations-possibilities-and-challenges-for-the-future
41.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: agroterrorism threats to americas economy and food supply
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/agroterrorism-threats-to-americas-economy-and-food-supply
42.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: 2025 UAP Workshop Paper
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information%20Papers/2025_UAP_Workshop_Paper.pdf
43.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AARO Brief at Annual Transportation Research Board January 11 2023 508
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Brief_at_Annual_Transportation_Research_Board-January_11_2023_508.pdf
44.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/
45.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Article/917254/common-defense-leads-to-unique-partnership/
46.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/about-norad/norad-agreement/
47.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Article/578023/norad-celebrates-44th-anniversary/
48.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Fact-Sheets/
49.
Source: norad.mil
Title: a brief history of norad (current as of march 2014)
Link:https://www.norad.mil/portals/29/documents/a%20brief%20history%20of%20norad%20%28current%20as%20of%20march%202014%29.pdf
Published: march 2014
50.
Source: norad.mil
Link:https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Article/578040/norad-maintains-vigilance/
51.
Source: norad.mil
Title: space based capabilities critical to norad usnorthcom missions
Link:https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Article/578248/space-based-capabilities-critical-to-norad-usnorthcom-missions/
52.
Source: cpr.org
Link:https://www.cpr.org/2019/12/31/the-faa-is-now-investigating-colorados-mysterious-drones-and-sen-cory-gardner-has-weighed-in-too/
Source snippet
Colorado Public RadioThe FAA Is Now Investigating Colorado's Mysterious Drones31 Dec 2019 — Phillips County Sheriff Thomas Elliott told C...
53.
Source: abcnews.com
Title: ABC News New drone task force investigating mysterious sightings
Link:https://abcnews.com/US/drone-task-force-investigating-mysterious-sightings-colorado-nebraska/story?id=68102066
54.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=25777
55.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=173310
56.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=4192
57.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=49603
58.
Source: abcnews.com
Link:https://abcnews.com/US/mystery-drone-investigation-intensifies-close-encounter-medical-helicopter/story?id=68201092
59.
Source: thedarkatlas.com
Title: norad cheyenne mountain complex
Link:https://thedarkatlas.com/posts/norad-cheyenne-mountain-complex
Additional References
60.
Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/061226/release_03/documents/ICA-UAP-D001_Analysis_Colorado-Springs-UAP-Incident.pdf
61.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
62.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections
63.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Nuclear Base Breached? | Pentagon Files Expose Giant Mother Orb
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQP7h9NZQcI
Source snippet
Declassified UFO Files Reveal America's Airspace Crisis...
64.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Declassified UFO Files Reveal America’s Airspace Crisis
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEmo3dfCT9U
Source snippet
Why the Pentagon Released a Drawing of a 'Potato-Shaped' UFO...
65.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/fj8epq/cheyenne_mountain_air_force_station_now/
66.
Source: onlyinyourstate.com
Link:https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/experiences/colorado/area-51-co
67.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/%40davidheitz50/denver-area-ufo-sightings-a-dozen-reported-so-far-this-year-445398504797
68.
Source: vocal.media
Link:https://vocal.media/history/flying-tic-tac-in-denver-metro-among-recent-colorado-ufo-sightings
69.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/%40davidheitz50/recent-colorado-ufo-sightings-sparkling-craft-possible-abduction-f05adf67d833