Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The episode matters because it exposes the central difficulty in Oklahoma’s UFO record. Some observations involved multiple witnesses or apparent instrument confirmation, yet the surviving evidence is incomplete, contradictory and frequently separated from its original technical context. Project Blue Book offered astronomical explanations that critics considered demonstrably poor, but criticism of an official explanation does not establish an extraordinary alternative. Oklahoma therefore contains genuinely unresolved reports, alongside folklore, weakly documented stories and incidents probably caused by ordinary aircraft, astronomical objects, balloons or later technologies.

Why Oklahoma produced so many reports
Oklahoma sits beneath busy civil and military airspace and has long had unusually strong connections with aviation. Tinker Air Force Base, beside Oklahoma City, became a major maintenance and logistics centre, while other installations, airports, weather stations and Civil Air Patrol units placed large numbers of trained observers and detection systems around the state. That did not necessarily make anomalous objects more common; it made unusual lights and radar returns more likely to be noticed, reported and discussed.
The state also offers long sightlines and broad horizons. These help observers see distant events, but they make distance, height and speed extremely difficult to judge. A light near the horizon can appear to hover, reverse direction or change colour because of atmospheric distortion and the observer’s own movement. Stars and planets can scintillate strongly, while aircraft seen almost head-on may appear stationary before seeming to accelerate as their angle changes.
These limitations are important because eyewitness reports form most of Oklahoma’s record. NASA’s independent UAP study concluded that modern analysis is restricted chiefly by poor and inconsistent data, rather than by a shortage of analytical techniques. A witness may be entirely honest and still lack the positional, timing and sensor information needed to determine what was seen.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govNASA ScienceIndependent Study Team ReportSeptember 13, 2023 — At present, UAP analysis is more limited by the quality of data than by the…
The 1965 wave that defined the state’s UFO history
Reports increased sharply across Oklahoma and neighbouring states around 31 July–2 August 1965. Accounts collected by Oklahoma investigator Hayden Hewes described multicoloured lights, formations and objects apparently changing altitude or direction. Oklahoma Highway Patrol communications reportedly received numerous calls, and people gathered near a patrol communications tower north of Oklahoma City to watch the sky.[International UFO Bureau]internationalufobureau.comInternational UFO BureauThe 1965 UFO Sightings: A Historic Event InvestigatedBy around 9 PM, Oklahoma Highway Patrol had received over 20…
The reports were part of a broader south-central and Midwestern wave that included Kansas, Texas, New Mexico and other states. This wider distribution is significant. It reduces the likelihood that every report originated with one local hoax, but it also increases the number of possible conventional causes: astronomical objects visible across a large region, high-altitude aircraft, balloons, meteors, atmospheric effects and reports influenced by rapidly spreading news coverage.
The disputed Tinker radar story
The most consequential claim was that Tinker Air Force Base radar tracked as many as four unidentified targets. Contemporary material preserved in US government files records the Oklahoma Highway Patrol as saying that Tinker had detected four objects at once at roughly 23,000 feet. Other accounts alleged abrupt descents to much lower altitudes.[CIA]cia.govFLYING SAUCERS UFO REPORTS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)Oklahoma Highway Patrol said Tinker Air Force Base tracked four on its radar scree…
If complete and accurately reported radar plots had survived, this could have become Oklahoma’s strongest case. Radar can provide information unavailable to a visual observer, including range, altitude and movement. However, the publicly accessible story is largely transmitted through press accounts, civilian UFO literature and summaries of official correspondence. Tinker reportedly declined to confirm or deny the contemporary report, and no complete technical package containing calibrated plots, operator statements, equipment settings and weather analysis is readily available in the cited public record.[Internet Archive]archive.orgUFO Magazine Annual 1967 djvu.txtUFO Magazine Annual 1967 djvu.txt
Radar returns are not automatically solid aircraft. Weather, temperature inversions, birds, equipment artefacts and propagation effects can generate misleading targets. Nor does the presence of an unexplained radar return prove that it corresponds to a particular light seen from the ground. The Tinker element therefore strengthens the historical interest of the 1965 wave, but its evidential value is limited by missing primary technical data.
Project Blue Book’s explanation
Project Blue Book attributed much of the wave to Jupiter and bright stars, including Rigel and Betelgeuse, with atmospheric scintillation explaining apparent colour changes. Misidentified celestial objects are a credible general explanation for stationary or slowly moving lights, especially near the horizon. The National Archives notes that Project Blue Book regularly resolved reports as aircraft, balloons, satellites, stars, reflections, birds, spotlights or hoaxes.[The Unwritten Record]unwritten-record.blogs.archives.govThe Unwritten RecordAliens at the Archives - The Unwritten RecordApril 26, 2017 — 26 Apr 2017 — Project Blue Book grouped these sightings…
The Oklahoma explanation nevertheless attracted immediate criticism. Robert Riser, director of the Oklahoma Science and Arts Foundation planetarium, reportedly argued that the named stars were not positioned where the reported objects had appeared. Journalists also pointed out that stars and planets could not account for genuine radar tracks.[Wikipedia]WikipediaProject Blue BookProject Blue Book
This leaves a more complicated verdict than either side often admits. Blue Book’s public explanation appears to have been too broad and may have treated unlike reports as though they had one cause. Yet the inadequacy of that explanation does not show that all the observations represented one structured craft, much less an extraterrestrial vehicle. The wave probably combined several independent events: celestial misidentifications, conventional aerial activity, distorted estimates and a smaller residue of reports lacking enough information for a confident resolution.
The Tulsa images: important records, limited proof
During the same wave, 14-year-old Alan Smith photographed an unusual illuminated object from Tulsa in the early hours of 2 August 1965. Accounts say that several other people were present and described an object changing colour. The photograph later appeared in an Oklahoma newspaper and circulated through civilian UFO organisations.[Think About It Docs]thinkaboutitdocs.com1965 tulsa oklahoma ufo photograph1965 tulsa oklahoma ufo photograph
The case has unusual archival value because moving-image material associated with Tulsa entered Project Blue Book’s holdings. The National Archives identifies records titled “Tulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965” and “Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”. Their survival means the incident is more than an unsupported recollection repeated decades later.[The Unwritten Record]unwritten-record.blogs.archives.govThe Unwritten RecordAliens at the Archives - The Unwritten RecordApril 26, 2017 — 26 Apr 2017 — Project Blue Book grouped these sightings…
It is still not decisive photographic evidence. A bright object photographed at night can conceal its true shape through overexposure, camera movement, focus errors and internal reflections. Reliable estimates of size and distance require reference points, lens information, original negatives or film, exposure details and a documented chain of custody. Claims in later UFO literature that analysts established a nearby, large physical object should therefore be treated cautiously unless the complete analytical report and original material can be examined together.
The fairest assessment is that the Tulsa material is an authentic historical artefact connected to the 1965 wave, not proof of an exotic vehicle. It gives researchers something more substantial than memory alone, but its visual information is too ambiguous to identify the object.
Hayden Hewes and Oklahoma’s civilian investigation network
Oklahoma’s UFO history was shaped heavily by Hayden C. Hewes, an Oklahoma City researcher who founded the International UFO Bureau while still a teenager in the late 1950s. The organisation developed contacts among law-enforcement officers, astronomers and witnesses, allowing Hewes to receive reports quickly and preserve local testimony that might otherwise have disappeared.[edmondlifeandleisure.com]edmondlifeandleisure.comremembering a man who investigated the unusual p19337 76remembering a man who investigated the unusual p19337 76
His activity helps explain why Oklahoma’s 1965 wave is documented more fully than many comparable regional episodes. Hewes monitored police communications, interviewed witnesses, gathered photographs and supplied material to other researchers and news organisations. This created a bridge between individual observers, local media and the national UFO investigation community.
Civilian investigation nevertheless had limitations. Witness questionnaires and interviews can preserve useful details, but volunteer organisations rarely controlled the original scene, radar equipment or military records. Investigators could also approach a case already convinced that sightings formed part of a coherent UFO phenomenon. The resulting files are historically valuable but must be separated into contemporary witness material, later interpretation and promotional claims.
The Oklahoma Historical Society’s interest in Hewes and state newspapers’ coverage of his work make him a natural link between Oklahoma’s major incidents, police-report networks and surviving local archives. The state’s extensive newspaper and film holdings offer a promising route for reconstructing dates, weather conditions, witness statements and how individual stories changed as they were retold.[koco.com]koco.comoklahoma ufo history unidentified anomalous phenomena sightingsoklahoma ufo history unidentified anomalous phenomena sightings
Other Oklahoma reports are less secure
Stories of earlier military pursuits and radar encounters near Oklahoma City circulate in UFO books and online databases, including an alleged August 1954 incident involving fighter aircraft and a formation of objects. However, a surviving Air Force response states that the relevant technical intelligence centre had no record of an Oklahoma City UFO sighting during that month.[theprojectbluebookarchive.org]theprojectbluebookarchive.org2. location2. location
That does not prove that nobody saw anything. A report may have been submitted through a different command, incorrectly dated, poorly indexed or never formally entered. It does mean that detailed modern retellings should not be treated as established history without contemporary documents. The contrast with 1965 is revealing: the later wave has identifiable films, press coverage, official correspondence and named investigators, whereas some earlier stories depend heavily on retrospective summaries.
Later Oklahoma clusters face a different problem. The Oklahoma Historical Society’s encyclopaedia notes continuing UFO reports and refers to about twenty sightings around Ada in 1998, but this provides little information about individual witnesses, duration, directions, photographs or investigation results.[Oklahoma Historical Society]okhistory.orgOpen source on okhistory.org.
A cluster count is not the same as a cluster of unexplained craft. Reports may increase because of media attention, a meteor shower, military exercises, bright planets, unusual weather or a newly visible technology. Without case-level information, the Ada reports are best understood as evidence of continuing public interest rather than a landmark unresolved incident.
Military connections without a proven military secret
Tinker’s presence has encouraged theories that Oklahoma sightings involved secret aircraft or that the base possessed hidden information. Military airspace unquestionably complicates identification: classified or unfamiliar training activity can generate sincere reports, and Cold War secrecy sometimes prevented officials from giving complete public explanations.
Declassified history shows that secrecy did contribute to the national UFO problem. Some sightings elsewhere were later associated with aircraft programmes whose existence could not be acknowledged at the time. AARO’s historical review also notes that government UFO investigations often operated amid concerns about adversary technology, intelligence collection and public confusion.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUMEDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME
Nothing in the available Oklahoma material, however, demonstrates that Tinker recovered extraterrestrial hardware or operated an alien-technology programme. The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office says that its broader historical review found no verifiable evidence that any investigated UAP represented extraterrestrial activity or that the US government or private industry possessed extraterrestrial technology.[U.S. Department of War]war.govdod report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technologydod report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technology
That official conclusion is not a case-by-case explanation of Oklahoma’s unresolved observations. It does establish an important boundary: uncertainty, missing files and an unsatisfactory Blue Book statement cannot legitimately be converted into evidence of a hidden alien programme.
How strong is the Oklahoma evidence?
Oklahoma’s cases become clearer when divided by evidential quality rather than by how dramatic the stories sound.
- Historically well documented: The 1965 wave unquestionably occurred as a social and investigative event. It produced numerous reports, newspaper attention, civilian inquiries, official correspondence and archived film.
- Potentially significant but incomplete: Claims of Tinker radar tracking could materially strengthen the case, but the surviving public evidence lacks the full technical record required to verify performance claims.
- Visually interesting but inconclusive: The Tulsa images document an unidentified light or object, but they do not contain enough dependable information to determine its size, distance or nature.
- Weakly sourced: Earlier fighter-chase stories and later cluster totals become unreliable when they lack contemporary records, precise timelines or original witness material.
- Plausibly explained: Many isolated lights can reasonably be attributed to stars, planets, aircraft, balloons, meteors, atmospheric effects and, in recent years, satellites or drones.
- Unresolved: A report remains unresolved when available information cannot distinguish between plausible causes. “Unresolved” describes the limits of the evidence; it is not a positive identification of something extraordinary.
This distinction reflects the lesson of modern official studies. AARO reports that many cases resolve into balloons, birds, satellites and other ordinary objects once adequate data become available, while some remain open primarily because the information is insufficient. NASA similarly stresses the need for calibrated, multi-sensor observations rather than isolated testimony or ambiguous imagery.[AP News]apnews.comOpen source on apnews.com.
What Oklahoma’s record actually shows
Oklahoma deserves a recognised place in American UFO history because the 1965 wave joined public observation, police communications, alleged military radar activity, photography and organised civilian investigation. Few state episodes illustrate so clearly both the attraction of UFO evidence and its fragility.
The strongest conclusion is not that Oklahoma was visited by extraterrestrial craft, nor that every report was carelessly debunked. It is that Project Blue Book appears to have supplied an overgeneralised astronomical explanation for a collection of reports that probably had several causes. That weakened public confidence and allowed the most dramatic interpretation to flourish, even though the surviving evidence never established what the most unusual observations represented.
Later access to National Archives records has strengthened the historical reality of the Tulsa documentation and the official handling of the wave. It has not transformed the images or radar claims into proof of extraordinary technology. Oklahoma’s central UFO episode therefore remains partly unresolved: substantial enough to merit serious archival study, but too incomplete to support confident claims about alien vehicles or concealed recoveries.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Oklahoma's UFO Skies?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Provides context for Blue Book investigations.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Discusses credible military-related UFO reports.
The Demon-Haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Supports balanced assessment of sightings.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2017/04/26/aliens-at-the-archives/
Source snippet
The Unwritten RecordAliens at the Archives - The Unwritten RecordApril 26, 2017 — 26 Apr 2017 — Project Blue Book grouped these sightings...
Published: April 26, 2017
2.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100010002-9
Source snippet
FLYING SAUCERS UFO REPORTS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)Oklahoma Highway Patrol said Tinker Air Force Base tracked four on its radar scree...
3.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf
Source snippet
NASA ScienceIndependent Study Team ReportSeptember 13, 2023 — At present, UAP analysis is more limited by the quality of data than by the...
Published: September 13, 2023
4.
Source: edmondlifeandleisure.com
Title: edmond underground in edmond abuzz with uco sightings p10350 87
Link:https://edmondlifeandleisure.com/edmond-underground-in-edmond-abuzz-with-uco-sightings-p10350-87.htm
Source snippet
in '65 Edmond abuzz with UCO sightings11 Sept 2014 — Tinker Air Force Base reported tracking four UFOs on radar at an altitude of 22,000...
5.
Source: archive.org
Title: UFO Magazine Annual 1967 djvu.txt
Link:https://archive.org/stream/UFO_Magazine_Annual_1967/UFO_Magazine_Annual_1967_djvu.txt
6.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
7.
Source: edmondlifeandleisure.com
Title: tulsa paperboy made ufo history in p10411 87
Link:https://edmondlifeandleisure.com/tulsa-paperboy-made-ufo-history-in-p10411-87.htm
8.
Source: edmondlifeandleisure.com
Title: remembering a man who investigated the unusual p19337 76
Link:https://edmondlifeandleisure.com/remembering-a-man-who-investigated-the-unusual-p19337-76.htm
9.
Source: koco.com
Title: oklahoma ufo history unidentified anomalous phenomena sightings
Link:https://www.koco.com/article/oklahoma-ufo-history-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-sightings/45347432
10.
Source: theprojectbluebookarchive.org
Title: 2. location
Link:https://theprojectbluebookarchive.org/archive/Sanitized%20Version%20of%20Project%20Blue%20Book%20Case%20Files-PDFs-Part2/28959420.pdf
11.
Source: war.gov
Title: dod report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technology
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3701297/dod-report-discounts-sightings-of-extraterrestrial-technology/
12.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
14.
Source: archives.gov
Title: project blue book 50th anniversary
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary
15.
Source: education.blogs.archives.gov
Title: new on docsteach 2
Link:https://education.blogs.archives.gov/2020/02/28/new-on-docsteach-2/
16.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/citizen-archivist/missions
17.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/photographs
18.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
19.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2014/07/
20.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/index/2001.html
21.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: invasion of privacy
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/09/invasion-of-privacy/
22.
Source: archives.gov
Title: nara documents2
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/foreign-policy/cold-war/1961-berlin-crisis/nara-documents2
23.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: united states air force usaf
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/tag/united-states-air-force-usaf/
24.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Federal Records Guide: Alphabetical Index
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/index-alpha/a.html
25.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles
26.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/tag/washington-dc/page/2/
27.
Source: archives.gov
Title: still pictures guide
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guides/still-pictures-guide
28.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2014/page/5/
29.
Source: catalog.archives.gov
Link:https://catalog.archives.gov/
30.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
31.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf
32.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
33.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
34.
Source: war.gov
Title: 65 hs1 834228961 62 hq 83894 section 10
Link:https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_10.pdf
35.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Mutual UFO Network
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_UFO_Network
36.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings in the United States
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings_in_the_United_States
37.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings
38.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO conspiracy theories
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_conspiracy_theories
39.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: All domain Anomaly Resolution Office
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-domain_Anomaly_Resolution_Office
40.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: National Film Registry
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Film_Registry
41.
Source: history.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/project-blue-book
42.
Source: internationalufobureau.com
Link:https://www.internationalufobureau.com/pastinvestigations/1965flap
Source snippet
International UFO BureauThe 1965 UFO Sightings: A Historic Event InvestigatedBy around 9 PM, Oklahoma Highway Patrol had received over 20...
43.
Source: thinkaboutitdocs.com
Title: 1965 tulsa oklahoma ufo photograph
Link:https://thinkaboutitdocs.com/1965-tulsa-oklahoma-ufo-photograph/
44.
Source: okhistory.org
Link:https://www.okhistory.org/research/film
45.
Source: okhistory.org
Link:https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=FO011
46.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF
47.
Source: apnews.com
Link:https://apnews.com/article/5638be273b753253713a478546849e46
48.
Source: gateway.okhistory.org
Link:https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark%3A/67531/metadc2549115/m1/19/
49.
Source: gateway.okhistory.org
Link:https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark%3A/67531/metadc2429405/m1/19/?q=%22~1~1~1~1%22~1
50.
Source: gateway.okhistory.org
Link:https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark%3A/67531/metadc2371003/m1/8/
51.
Source: gateway.okhistory.org
Link:https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark%3A/67531/metadc912749/m1/3/
52.
Source: gateway.okhistory.org
Link:https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark%3A/67531/metadc2406618/m1/4/?q=George+Nigh
53.
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/DisplayCatDetailsGoto.asp?accessmethod=6&catref=WO%2F98
Additional References
54.
Source: reuters.com
Title: nasa panel hold first public meeting ufo study ahead report 2023 05 31
Link:https://www.reuters.com/world/us/nasa-panel-hold-first-public-meeting-ufo-study-ahead-report-2023-05-31/
Source snippet
NASA UFO panel in first public meeting says better data...1 Jun 2023 — "The current existing data and eyewitness reports alone ar...
55.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Strange sighting caught on News 4 Skycam
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8EKB0rW0NA
Source snippet
Unraveling the mystery of the Oklahoma UFO Unraveling the mystery of the Oklahoma UFO KFOR Oklahoma's News 4...
56.
Source: loc.gov
Link:https://www.loc.gov/programs/national-film-preservation-board/film-registry/complete-national-film-registry-listing/
57.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/ufo/usaf_fact_sheet_95_03.pdf
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Proof Is Out There: UFOs RACE Across the Oklahoma Sky
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a52zYAHDxWU
Source snippet
Unraveling the mystery of the Oklahoma UFO...
59.
Source: carpetbaggerbooks.com
Link:https://www.carpetbaggerbooks.com/pages/books/13556/richard-d-seifried-michael-s-carter/native-encounters-a-look-at-oklahoma-ufo-sightings-and-abduction-reports
60.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/viceuk/posts/a-new-analysis-of-ufo-reports-found-the-cities-where-people-are-most-likely-to-s/1329936732337739/
61.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGJGtRHJKVZ/?hl=en
62.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/115957895581/posts/10165928422050582/
63.
Source: oklahomacitycremation.com
Link:https://www.oklahomacitycremation.com/obituaries/hayden-cooper-hewes



