Within Ohio
What Did Police Chase Across Ohio in 1966?
The 1966 chase became famous for its police witnesses, long pursuit and unresolved dispute over what the officers actually saw.
On this page
- The sighting and pursuit
- Witnesses, radio traffic and changing accounts
- Venus, hoax claims and unresolved questions
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Before dawn on 17 April 1966, two Portage County sheriff’s deputies reported a brilliant object hovering near their patrol car east of Akron. Dale Spaur and Wilbur “Barney” Neff then followed it for roughly 85 miles through north-eastern Ohio and into western Pennsylvania, joined or independently supported by other police witnesses. The pursuit lasted well over an hour and became one of the best-known law-enforcement UFO cases in the United States.[theblackvault.com]documents2.theblackvault.com•. •. •. •. •. I… Dale Spaur of Portage County. startcll:after the obJeCt Ito- Oluo…Read more…
The case matters because it produced more than a single dramatic story. It involved several officers, cross-jurisdictional radio communication, prompt press coverage, witness interviews, photographs of disputed value and a surviving Project Blue Book file. Yet the evidence is much stronger as proof that the officers experienced something confusing than as proof of an extraordinary craft. The Air Force’s satellite-and-Venus explanation was poorly matched to important parts of their testimony, but no photograph, radar record or physical trace settled what they actually saw.
The sighting and pursuit
Spaur and Neff were travelling near Atwater, in southern Portage County, at about 5 a.m. when they stopped to investigate an abandoned vehicle. According to Spaur’s early account, he stepped from the cruiser after seeing a light behind nearby trees. An illuminated object then rose or moved into view, appearing close enough for him to describe a structured form rather than simply a point of light. He estimated it at about 30 to 40 feet across, with an intensely bright lower surface or beam and a metallic-looking upper section. He also reported a humming sound.[medium.com]medium.comseeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368seeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368
Distance and size estimates made in darkness are inherently uncertain. Spaur’s impression that the object was only about 150 feet above the road depended on his judgement of its dimensions and position relative to trees. Without a measured range, an apparently large nearby object and a smaller or brighter distant one can produce similar visual angles. Nevertheless, his description was not initially framed as a remote star-like light: he claimed to see something broad, low and clearly defined.
The deputies radioed the Portage County sheriff’s office. Spaur was instructed to keep the object under observation, after which it began moving eastwards and the patrol car followed along roads including US Route 224. Accounts of the pursuit describe speeds rising towards 80 to 100 miles per hour, although these figures largely come from witness recollection and press reporting rather than a complete, time-stamped vehicle log. The object was said to remain ahead of the cruiser, sometimes appearing to slow as the officers fell behind and then to accelerate again.[theblackvault.com]documents2.theblackvault.com•. •. •. •. •. I… Dale Spaur of Portage County. startcll:after the obJeCt Ito- Oluo…Read more…
Officer Wayne Huston of East Palestine heard the developing incident over police radio and joined the pursuit in Columbiana County. He reportedly saw a bright object approaching before Spaur and Neff’s cruiser reached him, an important detail because it reduces the possibility that he merely mistook their headlights or adopted their story after meeting them. Near the end of the chase, Conway, Pennsylvania, officer Frank Panzanella also reported seeing an unusually bright object in the direction from which the Ohio officers were arriving.[wordpress.com]thepennsylvaniarambler.wordpress.comThe Great UFO Chase: Part OneThe Great UFO Chase: Part One
By the time the officers reached western Pennsylvania, daylight was increasing and the object appeared more distant. The pursuit ended near the Beaver County communities of Freedom and Conway, where the Portage County cruiser was low on fuel. Estimates of the total route vary slightly, but contemporary and later accounts usually place it at about 85 or 86 miles.[theblackvault.com]documents2.theblackvault.com•. •. •. •. •. I… Dale Spaur of Portage County. startcll:after the obJeCt Ito- Oluo…Read more…
Why the police testimony carries weight
The strongest evidence in the case is the cluster of law-enforcement testimony. Police officers are not immune to misperception, but the participation of witnesses in separate vehicles and jurisdictions makes the episode more substantial than a solitary sighting.
Spaur and Neff were together during the closest reported phase. Huston entered later after hearing radio traffic, while Panzanella observed from Pennsylvania. Mantua police chief Gerald Buchert also reported seeing and photographing an unusual object that morning, although he was not part of the road pursuit. Taken together, the accounts suggest that unusual lights were visible across a broad area during the relevant period.[nicap.org]nicap.org660417ravenna dir660417ravenna dir
That does not necessarily mean every witness saw the same object. The officers occupied different locations, looked in different directions and observed at changing times near dawn, when the Moon, Venus, aircraft lights and atmospheric effects could all have been visible. Once radio messages had established the expectation of a moving UFO, later observers may also have interpreted unrelated bright lights within the same narrative.
The witnesses nevertheless described features that are difficult to reduce to a single distant planet. Spaur spoke of a low, broad object with bright illumination and audible humming. Huston said the light moved into position ahead of him before the other cruiser arrived. Panzanella’s report placed a bright object over or near the Ohio River area. The repeated claim that it changed altitude or maintained a relationship with the pursuing cars became central to objections against the Air Force explanation.[medium.com]medium.comseeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368seeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368
Police status should therefore be treated as a credibility factor, not a measuring instrument. The officers were accustomed to observation and reporting, and they risked professional embarrassment by making the claims. But none had equipment capable of establishing the object’s distance, dimensions, speed or trajectory. Their testimony supports the reality of an unusual experience; it does not independently verify the physical characteristics they inferred.
What the radio traffic proves
The police communications are among the case’s most valuable records because they show that the pursuit was unfolding in real time rather than being invented later as a complete story. Surviving recordings and transcripts preserve Spaur’s excitement, his descriptions of a stationary or moving light and the attempts by dispatchers and other departments to follow events across county and state boundaries. Archival collections also preserve contemporary interviews with Spaur and other officers.[NICAP]nicap.org660417ravenna dir660417ravenna dir
The radio evidence establishes several useful points:
- The deputies reported the object promptly.
- Other departments were alerted while the sighting was still under way.
- Huston’s involvement arose from monitored communications rather than later newspaper coverage.
- The changing locations of the patrol cars can be reconstructed approximately from calls and jurisdictional contacts.
- The officers were uncertain and seeking assistance, rather than presenting a polished explanation.
Radio traffic does not, however, record an independent instrument tracking the object. The changing position attributed to it came from the officers’ visual impressions. Communications also became fragmented as the chase moved beyond the range of the Portage County base station and information had to pass through several dispatch centres, sometimes by telephone because Ohio and Pennsylvania agencies used incompatible radio channels.[Medium]medium.comthe ufo chase you saw in close encounters 649637923267the ufo chase you saw in close encounters 649637923267
This matters when later accounts present the pursuit as if police agencies maintained a continuous plotted track. They did not. The record is better understood as a chain of urgent observations, relayed through an imperfect communications network.
Did the witnesses keep the same story?
The core account remained fairly stable: a bright object appeared close to Spaur and Neff, moved east, was followed across Ohio and was subsequently seen by other officers. Details changed or varied, however, particularly estimates of altitude, shape and distance.
Spaur’s descriptions included a disc, a metallic form and a shape sometimes compared with an ice-cream cone or two saucers joined together. Such variation is not automatically evidence of deception. A brilliant source seen from below may hide its outline, while witnesses often use different comparisons when trying to describe an unfamiliar shape. But it does weaken attempts to reconstruct a precise craft from testimony alone.[reddit.com]reddit.comin 1966 3 police officers chased a ufo for 86in 1966 3 police officers chased a ufo for 86
The reported duration also becomes less straightforward when the event is divided into phases. The close encounter near Atwater was relatively brief. Much of the later pursuit involved a light at a greater apparent distance. It is therefore possible that the officers first encountered one stimulus and later followed another, or that a striking initial sighting shaped how they interpreted Venus or another bright object thereafter.
Neff avoided extensive public discussion, while Panzanella also resisted later interviews. Their reluctance has sometimes been interpreted as fear or official pressure, but it may equally reflect unwanted publicity. Spaur remained the public face of the incident, which caused later retellings to depend disproportionately on his recollections. Contemporary reporting indicates that ridicule and attention placed severe pressure on him and contributed to lasting personal and professional distress.[clevescene.com]clevescene.comstrangers in the night 1485939Cleveland SceneStrangers in the Night31 Mar 2004 — In 1966, Ohio cops chased a UFO into Pennsylvania. Then the government got involved, a…
The human consequences do not prove the sighting’s physical interpretation. They do show why silence or inconsistency among witnesses cannot simply be treated as evidence that nothing happened.
The photographs that settled nothing
Gerald Buchert, Mantua’s police chief, took photographs of a bright object from near his home during the general sighting period. Contemporary descriptions said one image appeared to show light and dark curved forms, encouraging claims that it depicted two saucer-like sections.[medium.com]medium.comseeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368seeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368
The photographs are much weaker evidence than their reputation suggests. They lack a clear scale, measured direction and reliable distance. William Weitzel, who investigated the case for the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, did not regard the image as decisive. Bright celestial objects, camera movement, internal reflections and processing artefacts can create shapes that appear structured after enlargement.[cufos.org]cufos.org1966 04 17 US OH Portage County NICAP Weitzel P 13 UFO Reportr1966 04 17 US OH Portage County NICAP Weitzel P 13 UFO Reportr
There is also no widely accepted photographic sequence showing the object moving along the chase route. The surviving imagery does not independently connect Buchert’s light with the object described at close range by Spaur. It is best treated as evidence that Buchert photographed something bright, not as a clear photograph of a large airborne craft.
No physical traces were recovered. There was no confirmed landing site, debris, electromagnetic damage or medical effect. Nor is there a known radar record that traces an object from Portage County into Pennsylvania. These absences do not disprove the officers’ experience, but they leave the case dependent mainly on human observation.
How Project Blue Book handled the case
The official investigation began through an Air Force unit near Pittsburgh and was transferred to Project Blue Book at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Blue Book’s surviving case material includes witness information, correspondence, press reports and discussion of the photographs. The National Archives preserves the wider declassified Blue Book collection, although individual files vary considerably in completeness.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Major Hector Quintanilla, Blue Book’s director, concluded that the officers had initially seen an artificial satellite and subsequently followed Venus. The broad logic was that a bright moving satellite could account for the opening phase, while Venus, conspicuous before sunrise, could appear to remain ahead of a car travelling east.[Wikipedia]WikipediaProject Blue BookProject Blue Book
The explanation was vulnerable because the investigation was brief and did not adequately reconcile the astronomical proposal with the full witness testimony. Reports indicate that the Air Force questioned Spaur but did not conduct equally detailed interviews with all participating officers before announcing its conclusion. Portage County sheriff Ross Dustman publicly rejected the Venus identification, arguing that his deputies were familiar with ordinary celestial objects and had described something much closer and more mobile.[newspapers.com]newspapers.com23 Apr 6623 Apr 66
Blue Book’s scientific adviser, astronomer J. Allen Hynek, was also critical of the final treatment. The officers reportedly distinguished the object from the Moon and a bright star-like body near it, which complicated the claim that Venus alone explained what they were following. Hynek’s objection did not establish an exotic craft; it highlighted that the official identification had been asserted with greater confidence than the investigation justified.[Wikipedia]WikipediaProject Blue BookProject Blue Book
This episode illustrates a recurring weakness in Blue Book’s later years. Its formal conclusions were often presented as if a plausible candidate had been demonstrated, when in some cases the available records supported only a tentative possibility. Blue Book’s overall finding was that its investigations produced no evidence of extraterrestrial vehicles or technology beyond known science, but that institutional conclusion did not make every individual identification equally persuasive.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Public Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years After Project BlueNational Archives Public Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years After Project Blue
Could Venus explain the chase?
Venus is a serious candidate for at least the later part of the pursuit. Near dawn, it can be exceptionally bright and may seem to move when viewed from a travelling vehicle through gaps in trees, changing terrain or thin cloud. The “autokinetic effect” can also make a stationary point of light appear to wander when there is no fixed visual reference. A bright object near the horizon can therefore seem to pace a car, retreat when approached or shift position unexpectedly.
That explanation fits several general features: the eastward direction, the approach of sunrise, the apparent increase in distance and the object’s ability to remain visible over many miles without measurable physical effects.
It fits the claimed close encounter much less comfortably. A planet cannot hover just above trees, cast a localised pool of light, produce a nearby humming sound or pass over a patrol car. A Venus interpretation therefore requires at least some of those impressions to have been errors of distance, expectation or memory. It may also require a two-stage event in which the initial stimulus differed from the light followed later.
The Air Force’s satellite proposal for the opening phase is similarly incomplete. Satellites cross the sky steadily and are visible for only limited periods; they do not normally appear to rise from behind nearby trees and hover. The official theory was possible only by discounting the officers’ estimates of proximity and structure. That may be justified if those estimates were badly mistaken, but the file did not demonstrate that they were.[Wikipedia]WikipediaProject Blue BookProject Blue Book
A later sceptical reconstruction proposed that a bright meteor or fireball triggered the initial alarm and that Venus then became the object of pursuit. This has the advantage of separating the dramatic opening from the prolonged chase. It remains speculative, however, because no securely matched fireball report has been shown to reproduce the time, direction and duration described by the officers.[Wikipedia]WikipediaAvvistamento della contea di PortageAvvistamento della contea di Portage
The most defensible judgement is therefore not that Venus was irrelevant, but that it may explain only part of a confused, multi-stage event.
Was it a student hoax?
Months after the chase, a Kent State University student newspaper reported claims that students had constructed or launched an object responsible for the sighting. The suggestion became part of the case’s folklore because a human-made illuminated device could potentially explain a low, unusual object near the beginning of the incident.[dks.library.kent.edu]dks.library.kent.eduOpen source on kent.edu.
The claim was never supported by compelling physical evidence. No device was produced that could match the reported speed, endurance and route. A balloon, illuminated frame or suspended object might generate a local sighting but could not easily travel ahead of police cars for more than 80 miles while repeatedly changing apparent altitude and direction. The students’ account may have been a joke, an attempt to gain attention or a claim concerning a separate local light.
A hoax also struggles with the testimony from officers farther east unless those later sightings were independent misidentifications. A mixed explanation remains possible: a prank or ordinary object may have started the event, after which Venus and expectation sustained the chase. What is not justified is treating the student claim as a demonstrated solution to the entire case.
What remains unresolved
The Portage County chase is not “unexplained” because every conventional possibility failed rigorous testing. It is unresolved because the surviving evidence is insufficient to choose confidently between several imperfect reconstructions.
The case’s strongest points are:
- multiple police witnesses in separate locations;[podcastufo.com]podcastufo.comSource details in endnotes.
- contemporaneous radio reporting;
- a long route that can be broadly reconstructed;
- early interviews and an official file;
- testimony that distinguishes the object from an ordinary distant light.
Its main weaknesses are equally important:
- no reliable measurement of distance, altitude or size;
- no radar confirmation or physical trace;
- photographs too ambiguous for identification;
- varying descriptions of shape and movement;
- an investigation that was prompt but not exhaustive;
- the possibility that different stimuli were combined into one continuous story.
Later reporting has strengthened understanding of the chronology and the personal cost to the witnesses, but it has not added decisive technical evidence. Archival work has also weakened some popular embellishments. Claims that fighter aircraft definitely pursued the object, that the photographs clearly show a metallic saucer or that the police maintained a precise instrumented track go beyond what the strongest records establish.
The case therefore occupies an unusual middle ground in Ohio’s UFO history. It is stronger than a vague anecdote because the witnesses, communications and official documents are real. It is weaker than a scientifically persuasive anomaly because the critical quantities were never measured. The Air Force’s confident dismissal did not resolve the officers’ closest observations, but rejecting that dismissal does not confirm an unknown machine.
What police chased across Ohio in 1966 cannot now be established with certainty. The later phase may well have involved Venus, while the opening encounter could have been an astronomical event, an aircraft, a prank, a perceptual error or another stimulus that was never identified. The enduring lesson is less about extraterrestrial craft than about evidence: sincere, credible witnesses can create a powerful case, but testimony alone cannot reliably determine the nature, distance or performance of a brilliant object seen in darkness.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Did Police Chase Across Ohio in 1966?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Hynek discusses famous police encounters including classic cases.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Essential context for official investigations.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Compares credible witness cases.
The Demon-Haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Provides tools for evaluating extraordinary claims.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
Link:https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/projectbluebook/ProjectBlueBook-April171966-Ravenna-Mantua-Ohio.pdf
Source snippet
•. •. •. •. •. I... Dale Spaur of Portage County. startcll:after the obJeCt Ito- Oluo...Read more...
2.
Source: medium.com
Title: seeing a ufo ruined dale spaurs life f86bab152368
Link:https://medium.com/the-portager/seeing-a-ufo-ruined-dale-spaurs-life-f86bab152368
3.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Title: Police Chief Gerald Buchert of Mantua photographed the object from
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/portage66.htm
Source snippet
1966 Portage County UFO chase by policemen - Patrick Gross7 Nov 2003 — ufo - UFOS at close sight: the 1966 Portage County police UFO chase...
4.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/on-the-trail-of-the-saucers/persistence-is-futile-2af535c0800c
Source snippet
Persistance is Futile | Point of ContactRegulations required all base commanders to appoint an investigating officer for local UFO...
5.
Source: thepennsylvaniarambler.wordpress.com
Title: The Great UFO Chase: Part One
Link:https://thepennsylvaniarambler.wordpress.com/2022/02/20/the-great-ufo-chase-part-one/
6.
Source: medium.com
Title: the ufo chase you saw in close encounters 649637923267
Link:https://medium.com/on-the-trail-of-the-saucers/the-ufo-chase-you-saw-in-close-encounters-649637923267
7.
Source: newspapers.com
Title: 23 Apr 66
Link:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-akron-beacon-journal-23-apr-66-akr/29284852/
8.
Source: dks.library.kent.edu
Link:https://dks.library.kent.edu/?a=d&d=dks19661018-01.2.2
9.
Source: nicap.org
Title: 660417ravenna dir
Link:https://www.nicap.org/660417ravenna_dir.htm
10.
Source: nicap.org
Link:https://www.nicap.org/reports2/660417portage.htm
11.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
12.
Source: reddit.com
Title: in 1966 3 police officers chased a ufo for 86
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/nonmurdermysteries/comments/pg6wss/in_1966_3_police_officers_chased_a_ufo_for_86/
13.
Source: ufohistoryfiles.com
Title: Portage County material
Link:https://ufohistoryfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/145C.pdf
14.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: uap bulk download
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
16.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: J. Allen Hynek Josef Allen Hynek (
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Allen_Hynek
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Public Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years After Project Blue
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary
18.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Avvistamento della contea di Portage
Link:https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avvistamento_della_contea_di_Portage
19.
Source: reddit.com
Title: 50 Years Ago, Cops Chased A Flying Saucer for 89 Miles.On
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/4ercxs/50_years_ago_cops_chased_a_flying_saucer_for_89/
20.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/pen5gw/i_made_an_hour_long_video_about_the_portage/
21.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/w7thih/project_blue_book_case_no_10270_evidence_of_us/
22.
Source: reddit.com
Title: rare photo of ufo from 1966 police chase
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/wr5q9m/rare_photo_of_ufo_from_1966_police_chase/
23.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Michigan “swamp gas” UFO reports
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_%22swamp_gas%22_UFO_reports
24.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Identification studies of UFOs
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identification_studies_of_UFOs
25.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Hector Quintanilla
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hector_Quintanilla
26.
Source: medium.com
Title: ‘Something Happened to Dale’ | Point of Contact JUST BEFORE DAWN on Sunday,
Link:https://medium.com/on-the-trail-of-the-saucers/something-happened-to-dale-68c2ac39d5a8
27.
Source: newspapers.com
Link:https://www.newspapers.com/article/tulsa-world-ufo-incident-explained-po/194093890/
28.
Source: dks.library.kent.edu
Link:https://dks.library.kent.edu/?a=d&d=dks20040416-01.2.7
29.
Source: history.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/project-blue-book
30.
Source: thepennsylvaniarambler.wordpress.com
Title: the great ufo chase part two
Link:https://thepennsylvaniarambler.wordpress.com/2022/02/23/the-great-ufo-chase-part-two/
31.
Source: clevescene.com
Title: strangers in the night 1485939
Link:https://www.clevescene.com/news/strangers-in-the-night-1485939/
Source snippet
Cleveland SceneStrangers in the Night31 Mar 2004 — In 1966, Ohio cops chased a UFO into Pennsylvania. Then the government got involved, a...
32.
Source: forcesnews.com
Title: project blue book what was us air force operation investigate ufos
Link:https://www.forcesnews.com/usa/project-blue-book-what-was-us-air-force-operation-investigate-ufos
Source snippet
Forces NewsProject Blue Book: What was US Air Force operation to...3 Aug 2022 — In another sighting listed in the documents of Project B...
33.
Source: cufos.org
Title: 1966 04 17 US OH Portage County NICAP Weitzel P 13 UFO Reportr
Link:https://cufos.org/PDFs/Portage-County/1966_04_17_US_OH_Portage-County_NICAP_Weitzel_P-13_UFO_Reportr.pdf
34.
Source: findagrave.com
Title: hector quintanilla
Link:https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/1099948/hector-quintanilla
35.
Source: podcastufo.com
Link:https://podcastufo.com/tag/neff/
Additional References
36.
Source: podcastufo.com
Title: the portage county ufo chase
Link:https://podcastufo.com/the-portage-county-ufo-chase/
Source snippet
17 Jan 2021 — On the morning of April 17, 1966, two sheriff deputies, Dale Spaur and Wilbur “Barney” Neff, chased a UFO from Portage Coun...
Published: April 17, 1966
37.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/ufo/usaf_fact_sheet_95_03.pdf
38.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Case Review
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJP8OxZr2kE
Source snippet
He Never Changed His Story | The Chase EP10 | It Happened In Ohio...
39.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Disclosure Day’s Darkest Real Story Wasn’t Roswell
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIv6wobz3LM
Source snippet
10 Cases From Project Blue Book: The CIA's Hunt For UFOs...
40.
Source: thislocallife.com
Link:https://www.thislocallife.com/5-ufo-cases-in-ohio
41.
Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104590/unidentified-flying-objects-and-air-force-project-blue-book/
42.
Source: oreohio.org
Link:https://oreohio.org/portage-county-ufo-chase
43.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/LittleBeaverHistorical/posts/so-a-little-while-back-i-mentioned-the-ufo-chase-from-portage-county-ohio-to-con/780625674091213/
44.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1418534886016030/posts/1635863854283131/
45.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/wwj950/posts/on-march-21-1966-dozens-of-students-and-staff-at-hillsdale-college-in-michigan-r/1529912072477281/