Did Radar Really Confirm the Redmond UFO?

Introduction

The short answer is no: the surviving evidence does not show that radar conclusively tracked the same object seen by witnesses at Redmond Airport on 24 September 1959. That distinction matters because the case is often described as a classic “radar-visual” UFO incident, implying that both observers and instruments independently confirmed one target. The available records support something more complicated. Witnesses at Redmond reported a luminous object, while military radar operators reported an unidentified radar return elsewhere in the region. The Air Force later concluded that the radar contact was probably a fixed ground feature rather than an airborne object, and the surviving documentation does not securely connect the two observations.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

This does not automatically explain away the visual sighting. It does, however, weaken one of the strongest claims often made about the incident: that radar proved a physical object was manoeuvring over Redmond.

What the FAA and military radar records actually reported

The Redmond case unfolded during the early morning hours when police officer Robert Dickerson and later Federal Aviation Agency personnel observed an unusual bright light. Because the report came from airport personnel, it quickly entered the air-defence reporting network and attracted military attention. Fighter aircraft were directed towards central Oregon, and military radar facilities were asked to check for unusual traffic.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

The key point is that the radar evidence did not originate from the airport observers themselves. The visual witnesses were looking at a bright light near the horizon. The radar return was being reported by military radar operators at a separate facility. In later retellings these elements were often merged into a single narrative, creating the impression that controllers were watching the same object both visually and on radar. The surviving Blue Book-era material does not clearly demonstrate that connection.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

Researchers who examined the case files found references to a radar contact being followed for a period of time, but the available records do not contain the kind of detailed radar plots, scope photographs or tracking data that would be needed to establish a direct match between the visual sighting and the radar return. As a result, there is no reliable reconstruction showing that the radar target occupied the same position, altitude or flight path as the luminous object seen from Redmond.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

Why the Air Force identified the return as a fixed mountain installation

The most important development came during the Air Force investigation. Blue Book personnel eventually concluded that the radar return was probably not an airborne object at all. According to the official explanation, the radar operators were repeatedly detecting a fixed installation on a mountain rather than a moving craft. The radar contact was therefore treated as a separate issue from the visual sighting.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

This conclusion rested on a known limitation of primary radar. Radar systems of the late 1950s could generate returns from terrain, elevated structures and other fixed features, particularly under certain propagation conditions. A primary radar display simply showed reflected energy and could not automatically distinguish between an aircraft and every other reflecting object in its coverage area.[Wikipedia]WikipediaAirport surveillance radarAirport surveillance radar

Critics of the Air Force explanation have argued that radar operators should have recognised a stationary mountain target and that the return was reportedly treated as unusual at the time. Supporters of the official interpretation respond that radar anomalies and misidentified ground returns were not uncommon, especially in an era before modern digital processing and automated target discrimination. Because the original radar data are incomplete, neither side can fully test its case today.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

What is clear from the surviving record is that the Air Force did not ultimately treat the radar contact as confirmation of the object observed from Redmond Airport. Instead, investigators separated the two events and offered different explanations for each.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

How missing logs limit claims about altitude, speed and pursuit

Many dramatic retellings of the Redmond incident describe a radar-tracked object racing across Oregon while military aircraft attempted an interception. The surviving documentation does not support such precise claims.

To establish a genuine radar track, investigators would normally want information such as:

For the Redmond case, much of that material is either missing, incomplete or unavailable in the surviving public record. Without those data, later writers cannot reliably calculate how fast the target moved, how high it was, or whether it manoeuvred in a way that ruled out ordinary explanations.[Fold3]fold3.comUS, Project Blue BookUS, Project Blue Book - UFO Investigations, 1947-196926 Feb 2007 — Records and case files relating to investigations of sightings of…

This limitation is especially important because some modern summaries present the radar return as if it were a fully documented pursuit. In reality, there is no surviving chain of evidence showing a fighter aircraft locking onto the same target seen by airport observers, nor a radar record demonstrating extraordinary performance characteristics. The intercept effort itself is well documented; the successful tracking of a single anomalous object is not.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

Why the radar question remains unresolved

The radar issue sits at the heart of why the Redmond case remains debated within Oregon UFO history. If the visual sighting and radar return represented one object, the incident would stand as a stronger example of multiple independent forms of evidence converging on the same event. If they were separate occurrences, the case becomes more ambiguous.

The surviving record leans towards the second interpretation. Air Force investigators treated the radar contact and the visual observation as different phenomena, attributing the radar return to a fixed mountain installation while continuing to wrestle with the visual reports. At the same time, gaps in the documentation prevent a definitive reconstruction. The missing radar logs mean that modern researchers cannot completely verify or completely dismiss the claimed connection.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

As a result, the strongest evidence in the Redmond incident remains the testimony of the police officer and airport personnel rather than the radar story often attached to it. The case is notable because of the official attention it received and because parts of the Blue Book file remained unresolved. The radar component, however, is considerably weaker than popular retellings usually suggest.[NICAP]nicap.org590924redmond dirUFO ReportThe Air Force radar at Klamath Falls tracked the disc. Given the Air Force "explanations" and some incorrect data in 1959…

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Did Radar Really Confirm the Redmond UFO?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Covers classification of sightings and discusses radar-visual reports in a critical framework.

See on Amazon

Book

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects

By Edward J. Ruppelt

Explains how Air Force investigations assessed UFO reports and the limits of available evidence.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...

By Leslie Kean

Provides balanced discussion of radar cases, military reporting, and evidential standards relevant to evaluating radar claims.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry

By Michael D. Swords

Places military, FAA, and Air Force records into their broader historical context.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The UFO Experience: A Scientific InquiryThe Report on Unidentified Flying ObjectsUFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO disclosure print oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

Disclosure Day UFO Poster Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 34.95 | Shipping GBP 4.95NewSeller: pinkfeathers08 (98.7% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Disclosure Day UFO Alien Canvas Picture Print Wall Art

GBP 78.16 | Free shippingNewSeller: studioprints (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Alien UFO Poster Collection A3 – Sci-Fi Area 51 Wall Art Prints alien abductions

GBP 8.35 | Free shippingNewSeller: morethisway (99.9% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Disclosure day UFO Alien Canvas Picture Print Wall Art

GBP 31.41 | Free shippingNewSeller: studioprints (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: nicap.org
Title: 590924redmond dir
Link:https://www.nicap.org/590924redmond_dir.htm

2. Source: fold3.com
Title: US, Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.fold3.com/publication/461/us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations

3. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Airport surveillance radar
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airport_surveillance_radar

4. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book

5. Source: history.com
Title: ufo dogfight gorman us plane fargo
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/ufo-dogfight-gorman-us-plane-fargo

6. Source: bawdseyradar.org.uk
Link:https://www.bawdseyradar.org.uk/history/

7. Source: purbeckradar.org.uk
Link:https://www.purbeckradar.org.uk/purbeck/story.htm

Additional References

8. Source: youtube.com
Title: Police officer Robert Dickerson on witnessing a UFO in Redmond, Oregon,
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtAkwo2GC3o

Published: September 24, 1959

9. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu6iunUYRrM

Published: September 24, 1959

10. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy571Syq3HA

11. Source: youtube.com
Title: Redmond, Oregon,
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbr4KqXzGgU

Published: September 24, 1959

12. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

13. Source: instagram.com
Title: DQkzjm Ejb W
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DQkzjmEjb-W/?hl=cs

14. Source: instagram.com
Title: DQkzjm Ejb W
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQkzjmEjb-W/

15. Source: bendsource.com
Title: The Source
Link:https://www.bendsource.com/news/uforegon-16707374/

16. Source: sassofia.com
Link:https://sassofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Aviation-Abbreviations.pdf

17. Source: gutenberg.org
Link:https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/17346/pg17346-images.html