Within New Mexico UFOs
Did Project Mogul Really Explain Roswell?
Roswell's lasting mystery comes from a real military deception, but the surviving evidence points more strongly to balloon equipment than an alien craft.
On this page
- What happened in July 1947
- How Project Mogul fits the debris
- Bodies, secrecy and later contradictions
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The best-supported explanation for the Roswell debris is Project Mogul, a secret American balloon programme designed to detect evidence of Soviet nuclear tests. That conclusion does not make every part of the Roswell story neat or beyond dispute. The Army first announced that it had recovered a “flying disc”, then replaced that claim with an incomplete weather-balloon explanation. Decades later, former personnel and local residents described extraordinary materials, intimidation, additional crash sites and alien bodies. Yet those later claims are inconsistent, mostly unsupported by contemporary documents and often separated from the event by thirty or forty years.
Roswell therefore matters less as an unsolved alien crash than as a case in which genuine military secrecy created lasting suspicion. Project Mogul fits the location, timing and surviving descriptions of the wreckage far better than an extraterrestrial spacecraft does. The more dramatic claims about bodies and a second wreck site developed much later and have generally weakened under investigation rather than grown stronger.
What happened in July 1947
During June or early July 1947, ranch foreman William “Mac” Brazel found debris scattered across the Foster ranch, about 75 miles north-west of Roswell. His contemporary description was striking mainly for how ordinary the material sounded: rubber strips, tinfoil, tough paper, tape and lightweight sticks. There was no engine, cabin, substantial metal structure, weapon, propulsion system or body mentioned in the reports published at the time.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
Brazel eventually reported the find to Chaves County sheriff George Wilcox, who contacted Roswell Army Air Field. Major Jesse Marcel, the intelligence officer of the 509th Bomb Group, and counter-intelligence officer Sheridan Cavitt visited the ranch and collected debris. On 8 July, the base public-information office issued the announcement that made Roswell famous: the Army had obtained a “flying disc” through the cooperation of a local rancher and the sheriff. The Roswell Daily Record placed the claim prominently on its front page.[wikisource.org]en.wikisource.orgRAAF Captures Flying Saucer on Ranch in Roswell RegionRanch in Roswell Region in the Roswell Daily Record on July 8, 1947.Read more…
The announcement was reversed within hours. Brigadier General Roger Ramey’s headquarters at Fort Worth presented debris to reporters and identified it as balloon equipment, including a radar reflector. An FBI message sent that day similarly described a roughly hexagonal object suspended from a balloon and resembling a high-altitude weather balloon with a radar target. This contemporary communication is important because it records a balloon-and-reflector interpretation before the modern Roswell controversy existed.[DAF History]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
The Army’s behaviour nevertheless invited suspicion. Roswell Army Air Field was home to the 509th Bomb Group, then the only operational unit equipped to deliver atomic weapons. Its officers might reasonably have been expected to recognise routine military equipment. The sequence — a sensational “disc” announcement followed almost immediately by a mundane explanation from higher command — looked like a forced retraction, especially once Marcel later said the displayed material was not the most significant wreckage he had collected.[DAF History]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
For more than thirty years, however, the incident attracted little sustained attention. The familiar crashed-spacecraft narrative emerged after UFO researcher Stanton Friedman interviewed Marcel in 1978 and after Charles Berlitz and William Moore published The Roswell Incident in 1980. That later reconstruction introduced unusual metal, a broader military operation and stories of bodies at another site. Roswell’s transformation from a short-lived balloon story into the leading alien-crash legend was therefore retrospective, not continuous from 1947.[wired.com]wired.com0708army announces roswell new mexico ufo sightingInitially, the military claimed the debris was from a weather balloon, but interest was reignited in the 1980s when new interviews and Ch…
How Project Mogul fits the debris
Project Mogul was an early Cold War surveillance experiment intended to detect Soviet atomic explosions by carrying acoustic equipment high into the atmosphere. It involved the US military and civilian scientific teams, including researchers from New York University. Although many of its components were ordinary balloons, radar reflectors and instruments, the programme’s purpose and some of its operations were highly classified.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
A Mogul assembly was not simply one small weather balloon. Experimental trains could extend for hundreds of feet and include numerous neoprene balloons, lines, radar-reflecting targets, ballast containers, parachutes and instrument packages. When such an array broke apart and weathered on the ground, it could leave a wide field of foil-like material, rubber, paper, tape and slender wooden members — the same broad categories reported at the Foster ranch.[lbl.gov]muller.lbl.govOpen source on lbl.gov.
The radar targets are particularly relevant. They were lightweight, angular structures made with foil-backed material attached to wooden struts. Decorative tape used in their manufacture reportedly carried coloured flower-like or geometric patterns. That offers a prosaic source for later recollections of strange markings or “hieroglyphics” on pieces of wreckage without requiring alien writing.[DAF History]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
The Air Force’s 1994 investigation concluded that the Foster ranch debris probably came from a Mogul balloon train associated with the New York University team working from Alamogordo Army Air Field. Its preferred candidate was the assembly commonly called Flight 4, released on 4 June 1947 and lost after tracking showed it moving north-east in the broad direction of the ranch. Project records indicate that the team did not recover this array, unlike several neighbouring flights.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
This explanation also makes sense of the Army’s confused public response. Personnel at Roswell could recognise pieces as balloon-related while remaining unaware of the specialised programme that had launched them. Higher headquarters, once alerted, had a reason not to disclose that the United States was testing a system for monitoring Soviet nuclear activity. Calling it a conventional weather balloon protected the classified purpose but created a lasting contradiction: the official answer was broadly correct about the physical technology and misleading about why it was being flown.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
Was Flight 4 definitely responsible?
The strongest caution concerns the attempt to identify one particular launch. Project leader Albert Crary’s diary recorded that a scheduled balloon flight was cancelled because of cloud, while also referring to a cluster of balloons being sent up for testing on 4 June. Critics argue that the official report treated this improvised or unnumbered launch too confidently as Mogul Flight 4. They also question whether its reconstructed path can be proved well enough to place it on the Foster ranch.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
That objection limits certainty but does not remove the wider Mogul case. The central question is not solely whether a formally designated “Flight 4” can be followed continuously from Alamogordo to the exact debris field. It is whether balloon equipment of the correct type was being launched in southern New Mexico at the correct time, whether at least one relevant array was lost, and whether its construction matches the material described in 1947. On those broader points, the documentary and physical fit remains strong.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
The official conclusion is therefore best expressed with measured confidence: a Project Mogul-related balloon train is the most plausible source of the debris, while the assignment to one precisely reconstructed flight is somewhat less secure. That distinction is often lost when the debate is reduced to “Flight 4 or aliens”.
Why the wreckage claims remain disputed
The main argument against the balloon explanation rests on later testimony, especially Marcel’s claim that the recovered material was unlike anything he had seen. Various witnesses or their relatives described foil that would not crease, exceptionally strong fibres, metal that returned to its original shape and markings that seemed unfamiliar. Such accounts are more difficult to reconcile with ordinary balloon components if accepted literally.[Wikipedia]WikipediaRoswell incidentRoswell incident
Their evidential value is limited by several problems. The surviving 1947 descriptions emphasise rubber, foil, paper, tape and sticks rather than impossible alloys. Many extraordinary details appeared only after Roswell was revived as a UFO case. Some testimony came second-hand through relatives, while different witnesses disagreed about the amount of debris, its properties, where it was taken and whether the material photographed at Fort Worth was genuine or substituted.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
Marcel is an important witness but not an independent physical record. He participated in collecting the wreckage and later rejected the weather-balloon story, giving his account unusual weight. Yet his conviction that the debris was extraordinary does not by itself identify its origin. If Roswell officers were not briefed on Mogul, unfamiliarity with the complete assembly would be unsurprising. Memory also becomes harder to evaluate when interviews occur decades after an event and after the witness has encountered an established public narrative.[DAF History]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
Cavitt’s account moved in the opposite direction. He described material consistent with balloon debris and denied seeing an alien craft or bodies. That disagreement does not prove Cavitt correct, but it prevents the military witnesses from being treated as a united group supporting an extraterrestrial recovery.[DAF History]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
No piece of the alleged exotic wreckage has emerged with a documented chain of custody from the Foster ranch to an independent laboratory. No contemporary photograph shows a constructed vehicle or material that clearly exceeds 1947 technology. The case for an alien craft therefore relies overwhelmingly on recollection, interpretation and allegations that the revealing evidence was removed.
Bodies, secrecy and later contradictions
Alien bodies were not part of the original Roswell newspaper story. The contemporary accounts concerned scattered debris, and the surviving primary documentation does not describe occupants, a cabin or a second intact vehicle. Body stories entered the narrative later through accounts attributed to people such as civil engineer Barney Barnett, military personnel and Roswell mortician Glenn Dennis.[Wikipedia]WikipediaRoswell incidentRoswell incident
These claims do not form one coherent event. Reported locations ranged from the Foster ranch area to the Plains of San Agustin and other sites many miles away. Witnesses disagreed over the number, size and appearance of the bodies, the condition of the supposed craft and which military units conducted the recovery. Some accounts were second-hand, published after the alleged witness had died or altered during repeated retellings.[Wikipedia]WikipediaRoswell incidentRoswell incident
Dennis’s story became especially influential. He said the air base had asked him about small caskets and preserving bodies, and that a nurse had told him about an autopsy. Investigators were unable to verify the nurse under the names he supplied; Dennis acknowledged giving false names, explaining that he wished to protect her identity. Even researchers sympathetic to Roswell concluded that knowingly supplying false identifying information seriously damaged his reliability.[Wikipedia]WikipediaRoswell incidentRoswell incident
The Air Force’s 1997 report attempted to explain later body accounts through memories of anthropomorphic test-dummy drops, balloon recoveries and military accidents in New Mexico during the 1950s. Dummies were transported on stretchers, in containers or protective bags, sometimes with military vehicles and recovery crews. The report argued that witnesses had compressed separate events from different years into a single 1947 story.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govOpen source on defense.gov.(https://media.defense.gov/2010/Oct/27/2001330219/-1/-1/0/AFD-101027-030.pdf)
This part of the official explanation is less satisfying than the Mogul account of the debris. Test dummies were not dropped in 1947, so they cannot literally have been occupants recovered from the July incident. The Air Force instead proposed mistaken dates and merged memories, an interpretation that is possible but difficult to prove for each witness. Critics are justified in saying that “dummies explain the 1947 bodies” is an oversimplification.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govOpen source on defense.gov.(https://media.defense.gov/2010/Oct/27/2001330219/-1/-1/0/AFD-101027-030.pdf)
The more decisive point is that there is weak evidence that bodies were present in 1947 at all. The body narrative appeared late, expanded as investigators sought additional witnesses and accumulated contradictions rather than converging on a stable crash site and recovery sequence. The dummy explanation need not account for every story before the alien-body claim can be judged poorly supported.
What the official investigations established
New Mexico congressman Steven Schiff requested a government records search after becoming dissatisfied with the information available from the Department of Defense. The US General Accounting Office, now the Government Accountability Office, reviewed record-holding and reporting procedures and contacted several federal agencies. Its 1995 report found no documentation establishing an extraterrestrial crash or secret alien-recovery operation. It also found that some administrative records from Roswell Army Air Field had been destroyed, apparently under records-disposal authority, although the surviving information did not establish why particular files were removed or that their destruction was connected to a UFO cover-up.[GAO]gao.govnsiadnsiad
The National Archives likewise states that it has found no Roswell discussion within the Project Blue Book files. This is not surprising in itself, because Blue Book’s predecessor investigations had not yet begun in July 1947, but it means that the most famous alleged crash does not possess the kind of contemporary case file often assumed to exist within the Air Force’s later UFO archive.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK
The Air Force’s principal 1994 report assembled project histories, balloon records, witness statements and surviving contemporary communications. It concluded that the debris came from Mogul rather than an extraterrestrial craft. The follow-up report addressed body and recovery stories, attributing many to later dummy tests, accidents and distorted recollection. A 2024 historical review by the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office again assessed a crashed Project Mogul balloon outside Roswell as the source of the early claims and reported finding no verified evidence that the US government had recovered extraterrestrial technology.[af.mil]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
Official reports are not automatically conclusive, particularly when the original controversy was worsened by an official cover story. The Air Force was examining allegations against its institutional predecessors, and its precise reconstruction of Flight 4 remains challengeable. Even so, rejecting the reports requires more than pointing out that the military once withheld Mogul’s purpose. Their central explanation is supported by independent features of the record: the period and place of the launches, the lost balloon assembly, the match between the components and the contemporary debris descriptions, and the absence of 1947 documentation for bodies or an alien vehicle.
Did later reporting strengthen the crash claim?
Later reporting made Roswell richer as a story but weaker as a single historical event. Researchers gathered a large body of oral testimony, recovered forgotten details of military secrecy and correctly demonstrated that “ordinary weather balloon” was not the full explanation. They also showed why the original press release and reversal deserved scrutiny rather than dismissal.[DAF History]dafhistory.af.milDAF HistoryThe Roswell Report… Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl…
What later work did not produce was verifiable alien wreckage, a contemporary medical or mortuary record, a consistent second-site chronology or official documentation of non-human occupants. Instead, successive versions added new locations, witnesses and recovery operations that did not always agree with earlier versions. The well-known “alien autopsy” film released in the 1990s was not credible evidence of the 1947 event, and alleged Majestic 12 papers did not provide a reliable documentary foundation for the crash narrative. The GAO recorded serious authenticity concerns surrounding Majestic 12 material rather than confirming it.[GAO]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.
The balance of evidence therefore favours a real but terrestrial incident: classified balloon equipment fell on a New Mexico ranch; local officers issued an ill-judged announcement during the 1947 flying-disc craze; higher command concealed the programme behind a simplified weather-balloon story; and decades of mistrust transformed that genuine deception into a much larger narrative of spacecraft and bodies.
Roswell is not wholly “explained” in the sense that every recollection can be traced to one object and every official decision reconstructed. Project Mogul nevertheless explains the physical core of the case more economically and with stronger documentary support than an alien crash. The surviving uncertainty lies mainly in the exact balloon launch, the handling of the announcement and the origins of later memories — not in positive evidence for extraterrestrial technology.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did Project Mogul Really Explain Roswell?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Roswell: Inconvenient Facts and the Will to Believe
Strong evidence-based examination supporting the Project Mogul explanation.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Provides context for early Air Force UFO investigations.
The Roswell Incident
Essential for understanding how the alien-crash narrative developed.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromRoswell UFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: RAAF Captures Flying Saucer on Ranch in Roswell Region
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Roswell_Daily_Record/1947/RAAF_Captures_Flying_Saucer_on_Ranch_in_Roswell_Region
Source snippet
Ranch in Roswell Region in the Roswell Daily Record on July 8, 1947.Read more...
Published: July 8, 1947
2.
Source: time.com
Title: roswell history
Link:https://time.com/3916193/roswell-history/
Source snippet
Brazel encontró restos extraños en su rancho cerca de Roswell, N.M. Tras contactar al Sheriff George Wilcox, quien a su vez llamó la base...
3.
Source: wired.com
Title: 0708army announces roswell new mexico ufo sighting
Link:https://www.wired.com/2010/07/0708army-announces-roswell-new-mexico-ufo-sighting/
Source snippet
July 8, 1947: Roswell Incident Launches UFO Controversy8 Jul 2010 — The Roswell Army Air Field issues a press release that says the...
Published: July 8, 1947
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Roswell incident
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_incident
6.
Source: nsa.gov
Title: report af roswell
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/ufo/report_af_roswell.pdf
7.
Source: muller.lbl.gov
Link:https://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/physics10/Roswell/USMogulReport.html
8.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2010/Oct/27/2001330219/-1/-1/0/AFD-101027-030.pdf
9.
Source: wired.com
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/roswell-aliens-fermi-paradox
10.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362854511_A_Grounded_Theory_Update_on_the_Roswell_UFO_Incident
11.
Source: people.com
Title: “Unsolved Mysteries”: The True Story of the Roswell UFO Incident
Link:https://people.com/roswell-incident-true-story-unsolved-mysteries-8722935
12.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Glenn Dennis
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Dennis
13.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-95-187.pdf
14.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
16.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832
17.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/154832.pdf
18.
Source: archives.gov
Title: do records show proof of ufos
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
19.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/espanol/ovnis
20.
Source: archives.gov
Title: moving images and sound
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/moving-images-and-sound
21.
Source: text-message.blogs.archives.gov
Link:https://text-message.blogs.archives.gov/2017/07/05/see-something-say-something-ufo-reporting-requirements-office-of-military-government-for-bavaria-germany-may-1948/
Published: may 1948
22.
Source: archives.gov
Title: 2004 annual3.txt
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/the-federal-register/2004-annual3.txt
23.
Source: archives.gov
Title: 1998 annual2.txt
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/the-federal-register/1998-annual2.txt
24.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Roswell (TV series)
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_%28TV_series%29
25.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: 1947 flying disc craze
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_flying_disc_craze
26.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a301955.html
27.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a235613.html
28.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a157449.html
29.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-98-57.pdf
30.
Source: gao.gov
Title: 10 441t
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-10-441t.pdf
31.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/b-133396-a88949.pdf
32.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a246743.html
33.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a320675.html
34.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/678340.pdf
35.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a235514.html
36.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a287278.html
37.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a242984.html
38.
Source: time.com
Title: did aliens really land
Link:https://time.com/archive/6731010/did-aliens-really-land/
39.
Source: content.time.com
Title: 0,33009,986565 3,00
Link:https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0%2C33009%2C986565-3%2C00.html
40.
Source: ia601607.us.archive.org
Title: DTIC ADA326148
Link:https://ia601607.us.archive.org/20/items/DTIC_ADA326148/DTIC_ADA326148.pdf
41.
Source: dafhistory.af.mil
Link:https://www.dafhistory.af.mil/Portals/16/documents/AFD-101201-038.pdf
Source snippet
DAF HistoryThe Roswell Report... Project MOGUL, the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne experiments, which provides the expl...
42.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/12/the-roswell-incident-at-70-facts-not-myths/
43.
Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/The-Roswell-Report/
44.
Source: depic.ai
Title: Roswell Daily Record,
Link:https://depic.ai/share/media_context_roswell-daily-record-july-8-1947-raaf-captures-flying-saucer-on-ranch-in-roswell-9d3b83
45.
Source: jhmovie.fandom.com
Title: Roswell incident
Link:https://jhmovie.fandom.com/wiki/Roswell_incident
Additional References
46.
Source: dvidshub.net
Title: intelligence agents investigate ufos roswell 7 jul 1947
Link:https://www.dvidshub.net/news/475677/intelligence-agents-investigate-ufos-roswell-7-jul-1947
Source snippet
DVIDSIntelligence Agents Investigate UFOs in Roswell (7 JUL...8 Jul 2024 — On 7 July 1947, a rancher named William “Mac” Brazel reported...
Published: July 1947
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB6FMi7Lpfg
Source snippet
The Top Secret Project That Spawned the Roswell UFO Incident...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: What really happened at Roswell: the sound channel and sky whales
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdSX-7vWyS8
Source snippet
Roswell, 1947: The Crash That Launched UFO Culture...
49.
Source: esd.whs.mil
Link:https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/UFOsandUAPs/RoswellReportCaseClosed.pdf
50.
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Title: File:Roswell Daily Record
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ARoswell_Daily_Record._July_8%2C_1947._RAAF_Captures_Flying_Saucer_On_Ranch_in_Roswell_Region._Top_of_front_page.jpg
Published: July 8, 1947
51.
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Title: File:Roswell Daily Record
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ARoswell_Daily_Record._July_8%2C_1947._RAAF_Captures_Flying_Saucer_On_Ranch_in_Roswell_Region.webp
Published: July 8, 1947
52.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1p8y8xj/firsthand_roswell_witness_who_saw_nonhuman_bodies/
53.
Source: history.co.uk
Link:https://www.history.co.uk/shows/roswell-the-first-witness/articles/jesse-marcel-roswell-s-first-witness
54.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacehipsters/posts/8096320837079395/
55.
Source: hangar1publishing.com
Link:https://hangar1publishing.com/blogs/ufos-uaps-and-aliens/mogul-balloon-explanation-roswell?srsltid=AfmBOoo754dTt9KJprII9OfxYr8iL345jS2qQZYaNbXl-i_PvftDVff2