Within South Dakota UFOs
Why Did South Dakota Report So Many UFOs?
Air bases, radar stations and civilian observer networks made South Dakota unusually efficient at turning uncertain lights into official reports.
On this page
- Ellsworth and the air defence system
- The Ground Observer Corps and civilian reporting
- How ordinary objects became linked into a statewide wave
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
South Dakota reported so many UFOs in the early Cold War partly because it had an unusually effective system for noticing, relaying and escalating uncertain objects in the sky. Ellsworth Air Force Base placed strategic bombers, radar personnel, intelligence officers and fighter aircraft near Rapid City, while the Ground Observer Corps recruited civilians to watch for low-flying intruders that radar might miss. A strange light could therefore move quickly from a volunteer’s telephone call to a plotting centre, a radar search, an interceptor pilot and ultimately Project Blue Book.
That network produced valuable records, but it could also make separate or ordinary events appear to form one coordinated phenomenon. Bright stars, aircraft beacons, meteors, balloons and misleading radar echoes entered the same defence machinery as genuinely puzzling observations. South Dakota’s statewide “wave” is therefore best understood not simply as a surge of objects, but as a surge of detection, communication and military attention during an era of intense concern about surprise attack.[trumanlibrary.gov]trumanlibrary.govTrumanDecember 7, 1952 — YOUR GOVERNMENT has been asked frequently in recent months why a Ground Observer Corps of civilian volunteers is…
Ellsworth connected bombers, radar and interceptors
Ellsworth was not an ordinary regional airfield. The base near Rapid City housed the 28th Bombardment Wing, which converted from B-29s to the enormous B-36 Peacemaker from 1949. Its crews carried out long-range training and reconnaissance missions within Strategic Air Command, the organisation responsible for America’s nuclear bomber force. The official wing history records a 41-hour B-36 training flight in 1951 and continued reconnaissance duties through much of the 1950s. This concentration of aircraft, trained observers and communications equipment increased both the number of unusual aerial impressions and the likelihood that they would be treated as intelligence matters.[ellsworth.af.mil]ellsworth.af.milAFD 110729 042AFD 110729 042
Air defence added another layer. The Air Force activated the 740th Aircraft Control and Warning Squadron at Rapid City Air Force Base in February 1953 as part of a wider expansion of radar coverage. The permanent Ellsworth radar installation did not become fully operational until 1955, so accounts sometimes blur together temporary equipment, developing facilities and the later fixed station. Nevertheless, the Rapid City area already contained Air Defense Command personnel and mobile radar capability during the celebrated 1953 incident. The system’s purpose was not UFO research: it was to detect uncertain targets and guide fighters towards anything that might be an intruding aircraft.[wikipedia.org]WikipediaEllsworth Air Force BaseEllsworth Air Force Base
This distinction matters. Radar operators were working in an environment where an unidentified return could represent a Soviet bomber, an American aircraft with incomplete identification, weather interference or equipment effects. Their duty was to investigate before assuming the harmless explanation. A report that prompted an interception therefore shows that the air-defence system was functioning cautiously; it does not by itself prove that the original stimulus was extraordinary.
The same infrastructure made military involvement highly visible. An uncertain light elsewhere might remain a family story or a short newspaper item. Near Ellsworth, it could generate telephone records, intelligence messages, radar notes and pilot testimony. Project Blue Book usually relied on the intelligence officer at the nearest air base for the initial inquiry, meaning that South Dakota’s military presence provided a direct route into the national UFO archive. Historian Leland H. Larsen found that roughly 35 South Dakota sightings were represented in the Blue Book material he studied.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
The Ground Observer Corps widened the net
Radar coverage in the early 1950s was incomplete, particularly against aircraft flying low enough to be hidden by terrain or the curvature of the Earth. Operation Skywatch addressed that weakness by placing civilian volunteers at observation posts and asking them to report aircraft movements by telephone. President Harry Truman publicly endorsed round-the-clock operation in July 1952, explaining that the corps was intended to detect low-flying aircraft that had avoided radar warning.[Truman Library]trumanlibrary.govTrumanDecember 7, 1952 — YOUR GOVERNMENT has been asked frequently in recent months why a Ground Observer Corps of civilian volunteers is…
The resulting system was deliberately distributed. Observers in small communities watched the sky, passed descriptions to filter centres, and helped build tracks from calls arriving from different posts. The Ground Observer Corps linked local civil-defence organisations with the Air Force, effectively turning ordinary citizens into the outer edge of the national air-warning network. By the middle of the decade it involved hundreds of thousands of volunteers across the country, supported by thousands of observation posts and dozens of filter centres.[airandspaceforces.com]airandspaceforces.comLarge cities and small villages appointed air-raid wardens, trained volunteer ambulance drivers, put up blackout curtains, and recruited…
Volunteers received guidance on recognising aircraft, estimating direction and reporting what they saw. They were not, however, equipped like modern scientific observing stations. Most sightings were visual estimates made without calibrated cameras, reliable range measurements or instruments that could distinguish a distant light from a nearby object. Even a conscientious observer could misjudge size, distance or movement when looking at a single bright point in a dark sky.
The network also encouraged reporting rather than dismissal. A volunteer who could not identify a light was expected to pass the information onwards because failing to report a hostile aircraft would have been more serious than reporting a harmless object. In that setting, “unidentified” initially meant only that the observer could not recognise the stimulus. It did not carry the later popular implication of an alien vehicle.
One of South Dakota’s most intriguing Blue Book entries demonstrates the importance of this civilian link. On 14 August 1952, a Ground Observer Corps member at White Lake described a stick-like or cigar-shaped object that periodically emitted smoke or vapour, remained visible for about half an hour and then moved rapidly west. Blue Book listed it as the state’s sole formally unidentified case in Larsen’s survey. Yet the surviving information is too limited to establish its distance, dimensions or nature, and Larsen noted that even a wayward missile could not be excluded.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
The case is significant less because it proves an exotic object than because it shows how the system worked. A civilian’s uncertainty was converted into an official, classified record because the observer belonged to a recognised defence organisation. Many equally strange private sightings would never have crossed that threshold.
One report could activate the whole network
The best-known example occurred in the Rapid City area in August 1953. A Ground Observer Corps volunteer near Black Hawk reported an exceptionally bright light low in the north-eastern sky. Personnel at the Air Defense Command radar facility searched for a corresponding return, military observers went outside, and an F-84 fighter was directed towards the apparent target. Later accounts describe a second fighter becoming involved after the first pilot reported a light that seemed to remain ahead of him.[sdhsf.org]sdhsf.orgaugust 2021 is it an airplane star or flying sauceraugust 2021 is it an airplane star or flying saucer
The exact chronology is less secure than popular retellings suggest. Some secondary versions date the sequence to 5–6 August, while a South Dakota Historical Society Foundation article gives 12 August. Accounts also differ over how many distinct objects were involved and how closely the visual and radar observations matched. Those discrepancies do not erase the incident, but they warn against treating every detail in later narratives as part of one unbroken official record.[sdhsf.org]sdhsf.orgaugust 2021 is it an airplane star or flying sauceraugust 2021 is it an airplane star or flying saucer
What made the episode seem compelling was its apparent combination of evidence:
- a civilian observer reported a light;
- military personnel also saw bright objects;
- radar operators obtained uncertain returns;
- fighter pilots attempted interceptions;
- the observations continued long enough for several participants to become involved.
This is often described as independent confirmation. In practice, the participants were connected by telephone and radio and were actively searching the same parts of the sky. Once the first report had established an expected location, later observers could unintentionally associate different lights or radar returns with the original object. The episode was multi-witness, but not necessarily a set of fully independent measurements.
The pursuit itself also offered few reliable distance clues. A pilot following a bright light with no visible structure could believe it was maintaining a fixed lead when it was actually a very distant astronomical object. Turning the aircraft could make a star or planet appear to shift, accelerate or remain in front of the cockpit. Meanwhile, radar could display unrelated aircraft, temporary echoes or returns produced by unusual atmospheric conditions. Without a continuous, recorded track tying the radar target to the light seen by the pilot, the two forms of evidence cannot safely be assumed to describe the same physical object.
The event still deserved investigation. Project Blue Book considered the mixture of ground visual, airborne visual and radar reporting important enough to send an investigator. That is stronger documentation than most South Dakota sightings received. Yet the case’s value lies as much in revealing the machinery of Cold War reporting as in preserving an unresolved aerial mystery.[ufology.patrickgross.org]ufology.patrickgross.orgOpen source on patrickgross.org.
How ordinary objects became a statewide wave
A reporting wave does not require every witness to see the same object. It can form when similar-looking stimuli enter a shared system during a period of heightened attention. South Dakota supplied nearly ideal conditions: clear horizons, long distances between towns, military aviation, civilian skywatchers and official instructions to report uncertainty rather than ignore it.
Several mechanisms could then link unrelated events into a statewide pattern.
Bright celestial objects appeared to move. Near the horizon, stars and planets can shimmer, change colour and seem to dart because their light passes through unstable layers of air. Without a foreground reference, the small movements of an observer, vehicle or aircraft can be attributed to the light itself. Blue Book repeatedly proposed astronomical explanations for South Dakota reports, although the supporting positional information was often missing. Larsen noted a case near Lead in which an airman watched a flashing multicoloured object for half an hour; the consultant suspected an astronomical source but admitted that elevation and bearing had not been recorded well enough for identification.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
Radar added apparent solidity. Early-warning radar was powerful but not infallible. Temperature inversions and other atmospheric structures could bend radio waves and create misleading or displaced echoes, while ordinary aircraft could become associated with a nearby visual report. Radar evidence becomes persuasive when several calibrated systems record a consistent track with known range, altitude and speed. The surviving public descriptions of the Ellsworth episode do not provide that level of continuous technical correlation.
Military activity supplied real moving lights. B-36 bombers, fighters, training flights and transient aircraft were common around Ellsworth. Aircraft seen head-on can resemble stationary lights; a turn can make the light vanish abruptly; distant formations can appear to change shape. In 1961, for example, five airmen at Gettysburg reported an apparent UFO that Blue Book attributed to the contrails of two B-52s flying in formation.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
Beacons and fixed lights could trigger interceptions. On 7 July 1954, an Ellsworth air controller reported a large star-like object apparently moving close to the ground. Fighters were scrambled, but the source was eventually identified as a permanent beacon viewed through haze. The incident is a particularly useful comparison with the 1953 case: even trained personnel, radar-supported air defence and an interceptor response could begin with an ordinary fixed light whose appearance had been distorted by visibility conditions.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
Publicity changed what observers noticed. Once newspapers and local conversation established that strange lights were being seen, more people watched the sky and more ambiguous objects were interpreted within the same frame. That does not mean witnesses invented their experiences. It means the threshold for noticing and reporting an uncertain light became lower, while officials had to determine whether reports were duplicate observations, unrelated events or possible security threats.
The CIA’s 1953 Robertson Panel recognised precisely this institutional problem. It praised the Air Force for creating an efficient channel for receiving reports of almost anything witnesses could not understand, but worried that a flood of low-quality reports might obstruct warning systems during a genuine attack. Its response was controversial: the panel favoured reducing public fascination and treating UFO reporting partly as a communications and security problem rather than solely as a scientific mystery.[CIA]cia.govHow To Investigate a Flying SaucerThe report from that panel concluded that “no UFO case which represented technological or scientific advances outside of a terrestrial fr…
Official records were plentiful but often shallow
The Cold War network was good at producing reports, but much less consistent at producing evidence capable of settling them. Larsen found that Great Plains files frequently consisted of a standard record card and a short telex message. Witnesses only rarely completed the longer technical questionnaire that asked for bearings, angular size, weather, duration and other information needed to test an explanation.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
This unevenness created two opposite risks. Weakly documented cases could be labelled “insufficient data” and later promoted as enduring mysteries. At the same time, an evaluator could assign a conventional explanation without enough information to demonstrate that it fitted. Larsen argued that some identified South Dakota cases were supported by evidence no better than cases left unresolved, and that conclusions sometimes depended too heavily on the individual evaluator.[South Dakota Historical Society Press]sdhspress.comSouth Dakota Historical Society Press
That criticism should not be mistaken for evidence of a hidden extraordinary phenomenon. Poor investigation weakens both confident debunking and confident UFO claims. A file lacking accurate direction, elevation, weather records or a recorded radar track may no longer contain enough information to distinguish an unusual craft from a star, aircraft, balloon or atmospheric effect.
Project Blue Book ultimately collected 12,618 reports nationwide between 1947 and 1969, of which 701 remained officially unidentified. The Air Force concluded that the programme had found no evidence that UFOs threatened national security or represented technology beyond contemporary scientific knowledge. Those conclusions remain disputed by critics of Blue Book’s methods, but “unidentified” in the archive means that investigators could not reach a satisfactory identification from the available evidence—not that they confirmed an extraterrestrial vehicle.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK
What the network explains—and what it does not
South Dakota’s Cold War infrastructure offers a strong explanation for the volume and official character of its early UFO history. It explains why civilians were looking upwards, why uncertain lights reached military desks, why radar operators were asked to search for matches and why fighters sometimes became involved. It also explains why a sequence of ordinary or unrelated stimuli could acquire the appearance of one organised statewide wave.
The network does not prove that every sighting was a mistake. The White Lake report remains thinly documented and unresolved, while parts of the 1953 Rapid City sequence cannot now be reconstructed with confidence. Some witnesses were trained military personnel, and several reports were sincerely puzzling. Their testimony deserves neither ridicule nor automatic acceptance.
The most defensible conclusion is that South Dakota became unusually efficient at manufacturing cases, not necessarily at attracting unusual craft. Its air bases, observer posts, radar rooms and reporting channels transformed fleeting perceptions into official events. That process preserved valuable testimony, but it also joined together stars, beacons, aircraft, radar anomalies and uncertain observations within a single Cold War narrative. Understanding that machinery makes the statewide wave less mysterious without pretending that every individual report has been conclusively solved.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO metal sign oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cia.gov
Title: How To Investigate a Flying Saucer
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/how-to-investigate-a-flying-saucer/
Source snippet
The report from that panel concluded that “no UFO case which represented technological or scientific advances outside of a terrestrial fr...
2.
Source: ellsworth.af.mil
Title: AFD 110729 042
Link:https://www.ellsworth.af.mil/Portals/146/AFD-110729-042.pdf
3.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Ellsworth Air Force Base
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellsworth_Air_Force_Base
4.
Source: fortwiki.com
Title: Ellsworth Air Force Station
Link:https://www.fortwiki.com/Ellsworth_Air_Force_Station
Source snippet
Established late in 1954 and became operational in 1955 as the Ellsworth Air Force Base Radar Site manned by the 740th Aircraft Control...
5.
Source: sdhspress.com
Title: South Dakota Historical Society Press
Link:https://www.sdhspress.com/journal/south-dakota-history-12-1/united-states-air-force-efforts-to-investigate-ufos-great-plains-encounters/vol-12-no-1-united-states-air-force-efforts-to-investigate-ufos.pdf
6.
Source: radomes.org
Link:https://www.radomes.org/museum/documents/GOC/GOC.html
7.
Source: sdhsf.org
Title: august 2021 is it an airplane star or flying saucer
Link:https://www.sdhsf.org/news_events/history_articles.html/title/august-2021-is-it-an-airplane-star-or-flying-saucer-
Published: august 2021
8.
Source: ufology.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufology.patrickgross.org/htm/ellsworth53bluebook.htm
9.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/ellsworth53.htm
10.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/F-2003-00606%20FINAL%20RESPON%5B16139957%5D.pdf
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
12.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
13.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2020/nr20-19
14.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections
15.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/textual-and-microfilm
16.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
17.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/publications
18.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/moving-images-and-sound
19.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary
20.
Source: visit.archives.gov
Title: gov50 Years Ago: Government Stops Investigating UFOs | National Archives Museum
Link:https://visit.archives.gov/whats-on/explore-exhibits/50-years-ago-government-stops-investigating-ufos
21.
Source: archives.gov
Title: ¿Registros muestran prueba de ovnis? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/espanol/ovnis
22.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: aliens at the archives
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2017/04/26/aliens-at-the-archives/
23.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia/ufos.html
24.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: project blue book looking to the film record
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2013/09/30/project-blue-book-looking-to-the-film-record/
25.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/ellsworth53harney.htm
26.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
27.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/ellsworth53ruppelttrue.htm
28.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/ellsworth53condon.htm
29.
Source: radomes.org
Link:https://www.radomes.org/museum/parsehtml.php?html=GOC.html&type=doc_html
30.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/341.html/1000
31.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/341.html
32.
Source: cia.gov
Title: CURREN T INTELLIGENCE WEEKLY | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79-00927a000100200001-0
33.
Source: cia.gov
Title: CURREN T INTELLIGENCE WEEKLY | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79-00927a000100180001-3
34.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300060013-8
35.
Source: cia.gov
Title: NS C STATUS REPORT ON THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp82-00400r000200100007-7
36.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300050038-2
37.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300050036-4
38.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp80-01826r000600210027-8
39.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300050028-3
40.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300050008-5
41.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300050009-4
42.
Source: cia.gov
Title: INDICATION S OF PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITIES | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-04864a000300040034-7
43.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Friend or Foe? | Cold War Air Defense Film
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BGNl61vVds
Source snippet
Project Blue Book...
44.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjinS2lZAsY
Source snippet
The Abandoned Cold War Radar Tower Where UFOs Were Seen...
45.
Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/344/statement-president-need-operation-skywatch
Source snippet
TrumanDecember 7, 1952 — YOUR GOVERNMENT has been asked frequently in recent months why a Ground Observer Corps of civilian volunteers is...
Published: December 7, 1952
46.
Source: airandspaceforces.com
Link:https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0206goc/
Source snippet
Large cities and small villages appointed air-raid wardens, trained volunteer ambulance drivers, put up blackout curtains, and recruited...
47.
Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/202/statement-president-ground-observer-corps-operation-skywatch
48.
Source: groundobservercorps.com
Title: About | Ground Observer Corps – Operation Skywatch
Link:https://groundobservercorps.com/about/
49.
Source: military-history.fandom.com
Title: Ground Observer Corps
Link:https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Ground_Observer_Corps
50.
Source: airandspaceforces.com
Link:https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/namesakes-richard-ellsworth/
51.
Source: ellsworthhousing.com
Link:https://www.ellsworthhousing.com/history
Additional References
52.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/113740171/Searching-the-Skies-The-Legacy-of-the-United-States-Cold-War-Defense-Radar-Program
Source snippet
Cold War Defense Radar Legacy | PDF(Official U.S. Air Force photographs courtesy Air Force History Support Office.)... S OUTH DAKO...
53.
Source: youtube.com
Title: What the Wall Street Journal isn’t telling you about UFOs | Reality Check
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVpWXxneti4
Source snippet
“ THE SKY IS YOUR TARGET ” 1955 GROUND OBSERVER CORPS USAF CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAM FILM 42504...
54.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGAgQ6barWs
Source snippet
Friend or Foe? | Cold War Air Defense Film...
55.
Source: ufoevidence.org
Link:https://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case41.htm
56.
Source: enigmalabs.io
Link:https://enigmalabs.io/library/cbebd9ab-9279-43fa-9f20-6830f0113c1d
57.
Source: groundobservercorps.com
Link:https://groundobservercorps.com/
58.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/218676792817854/posts/1420338929318295/
59.
Source: gutenberg.org
Link:https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/17346/pg17346.html
60.
Source: gutenberg.org
Link:https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17346.epub.images
61.
Source: sacred-texts.com
Link:https://sacred-texts.com/ufo/rufo/rufo19.htm