Within Arizona UFOs
How Military Training Shapes Arizona UFO Sightings
Training flights, bombing ranges and illumination flares make Arizona unusually rich in genuine but easily misidentified aerial events.
On this page
- Operation Snowbird and visiting aircraft
- The Barry M. Goldwater Range at night
- Why flares and formations look extraordinary
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Military aviation is one of the main reasons Arizona produces convincing UFO reports. Southern and western Arizona contain air bases, restricted ranges, military training routes and vast blocks of controlled airspace where American and allied crews practise formation flying, night operations, weapons delivery and electronic warfare. From towns many miles away, the resulting lights may appear silent, stationary, impossibly large or detached from any recognisable aircraft.
The clearest example is the Phoenix Lights of 13 March 1997. The later, widely filmed row of lights is strongly explained by military illumination flares descending over the Barry M. Goldwater Range. The earlier V-shaped formation is less conclusively documented, but aircraft associated with Operation Snowbird offer a credible explanation, supported by a telescopic witness who reported seeing separate aeroplanes. The wider lesson is not that every Arizona UFO report is military activity, but that military airspace must be checked before an observation is treated as genuinely anomalous.[af.mil]luke.af.mil56th Range Management Office56th Range Management Office
Operation Snowbird brings unfamiliar aircraft to Arizona
Operation Snowbird was created to support military units visiting southern Arizona for intensive flying training. Davis–Monthan Air Force Base describes the programme as serving units from elsewhere in the United States and allied countries that need dependable weather and access to extensive ranges. It has since been incorporated into a broader programme called Total Force Training, but the Snowbird name remains important because of its connection with the Phoenix Lights debate.[dm.af.mil]dm.af.milOpen source on af.mil.
The programme makes Arizona’s skies less predictable to ordinary observers. Someone familiar with the usual traffic around Tucson or Phoenix may suddenly encounter visiting A-10 ground-attack aircraft, fighters, transports or helicopters operating in unfamiliar formations. Participating crews can come from the regular armed forces, the Reserve, the Air National Guard, other services and foreign military partners. A 2015 environmental assessment allowed up to 2,326 visiting-unit training flights a year at Davis–Monthan, although officials said the actual figure could be lower.[dm.af.mil]dm.af.milOpen source on af.mil.
Those flights are not confined to the immediate vicinity of the base. Aircraft must travel between airfields, training routes, practice areas and the Goldwater Range. Military training routes are published on aviation charts, but they are not obvious to a person looking up from a garden, road or campsite. The Federal Aviation Administration notes that these routes are used for military exercises and are depicted on specialist visual and instrument-flight charts rather than ordinary public maps.[FAA]faa.govENR 5.2: Military Exercise and Training AreasENR 5.2: Military Exercise and Training Areas…
This matters because formation flying can create an impression very different from the reality. Several aircraft at substantial distance may look like fixed lights arranged along the edge of one enormous object. Their engines may be inaudible because of distance, wind direction or ordinary urban noise. With no visible fuselages and few depth cues, the eye tends to connect the lights into a triangle, V or boomerang.
The earlier Phoenix formation
The first phase of the Phoenix Lights consisted of reports of a formation moving south through Arizona during the earlier part of the evening. Some witnesses described separate lights; others believed that the lights belonged to a single dark structure passing silently overhead.
The conventional interpretation is that these were aircraft connected with Operation Snowbird, often identified as A-10s travelling in formation towards southern Arizona. One particularly significant witness was amateur astronomer Mitch Stanley, who viewed the formation through a 10-inch telescope and said he could distinguish individual aircraft. His observation does not invalidate the sincere impressions of people who thought they saw a solid object, but it shows how dramatically magnification and viewing conditions can alter an interpretation.[Phoenix New Times]phoenixnewtimes.comPhoenix New Times Phoenix Lights UFO mystery explanations | Phoenix New TimesPhoenix New Times Phoenix Lights UFO mystery explanations | Phoenix New Times
The aircraft explanation is persuasive rather than conclusively proven. Publicly available records do not provide a complete, minute-by-minute reconstruction matching every witness account, and descriptions varied greatly in apparent height, shape and speed. Some witnesses remain certain that what they saw was too large or too close to be a formation.
That uncertainty should be stated clearly. The earlier event is not as firmly explained as the later flare display. Nevertheless, a visiting military formation is a stronger evidential fit than the claim that a single immense craft crossed Arizona, particularly because the supposed solid body was inferred mainly from the arrangement of lights rather than consistently photographed.
The Goldwater Range creates extraordinary night displays
The Barry M. Goldwater Range occupies more than 1.7 million acres across Maricopa, Pima and Yuma counties. Its eastern portion is managed by Luke Air Force Base, while the western portion is managed by Marine Corps Air Station Yuma. The range supports air-to-ground weapons training, tactical manoeuvring, electronic warfare and other realistic combat exercises. The Luke range office is also responsible for roughly 11 million acres of associated airspace.[luke.af.mil]luke.af.mil56th Range Management Office56th Range Management Office
Its position is crucial to Arizona UFO reports. The range lies south-west of the Phoenix metropolitan area, beyond the Sierra Estrella and towards Gila Bend. Bright objects over the range can therefore appear low on Phoenix’s south-western horizon. At night, observers may have no reliable way to judge whether a light is above a nearby suburb, behind the mountains or scores of miles farther away.
Military activity there is not speculative. Official Luke Air Force Base material documents A-10 gun and bombing runs, F-35 manoeuvres, weapons employment and night operations on the range. The area is used not only by Luke’s aircraft but also by units associated with Davis–Monthan and the Arizona Air National Guard.[luke.af.mil]luke.af.mil56th Range Management Office56th Range Management Office
The later Phoenix Lights
At about 10 pm on 13 March 1997, residents around Phoenix saw and filmed a curved row of brilliant lights towards the south-west. Unlike the earlier travelling formation, these lights seemed to hang in place, descend slowly and disappear one after another.
Military officials initially failed to give a prompt, clear explanation, helping the mystery to grow. Later reporting established that visiting Maryland Air National Guard A-10s had conducted an exercise over the Goldwater Range involving parachute illumination flares. A pilot from the unit, Lieutenant Colonel Ed Jones, subsequently stated that a separate squadron of A-10s had dropped the flares during the exercise.[Las Vegas Sun]lasvegassun.commilitary now says flares may be cause of mysteriouLas Vegas SunMilitary now says flares may be cause of mysterious…25 Jul 1997 — It turns out visiting jets from the Maryland Air Nation…
The location, timing and observed behaviour fit that explanation closely. Parachute flares are designed to burn brightly for several minutes while descending slowly. Modern LUU-2 variants produce roughly 1.8 million candlepower for four to five minutes, making them visible at considerable distance under clear desert conditions. As the flares descend independently, wind and perspective can turn them into a gentle arc or irregular line.[Global Security]globalsecurity.orgGlobal Security LUU-2 FlareGlobal SecurityLUU-2 Flare - Dumb Bombs7 Jul 2011 — The LUU-2 has a burn time of approximately 5 minutes while suspended from a parachute…
The mountains supply the final part of the illusion. From Phoenix, the dark Sierra Estrella lies between observers and the range. A flare can remain visible while it is above the ridge line, then apparently switch off the moment it drops behind the unseen terrain. Several flares at different heights will consequently vanish in sequence, exactly the behaviour recorded in the best-known Phoenix Lights videos.
This does not mean that every person watching the display perceived it in the same way. Some observers reported movement or patterns not easily recovered from surviving footage. Witness recollections also evolved as the separate early and late events became merged into one story. Even so, the flare explanation for the later lights is supported by the training location, participating unit, pilot testimony, known flare performance and the visible descent pattern. It is one of the strongest conventional explanations attached to any major Arizona UFO episode.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgOpen source on skepticalinquirer.org.
Why flares and formations look unlike ordinary aircraft
Military objects often look extraordinary not because they perform impossible manoeuvres, but because the observer lacks the normal information needed to interpret them.
Distance is almost impossible to judge at night. A bright point carries no obvious scale. A flare 50 miles away may be mentally placed above a nearby neighbourhood, making its apparent size and slow movement seem remarkable.
Several lights become one imagined object. Human vision naturally connects aligned points. Five formation lights can therefore become the corners and nose of a dark triangular craft, even when no surface is visible between them.
Head-on aircraft seem to hover. An aeroplane approaching almost directly towards an observer changes position very slowly against the stars. Only after it turns or passes across the line of sight does its speed become apparent.
Parachute flares move too slowly to resemble falling objects. Their descent is deliberately restrained so that they illuminate a target area for several minutes. Without a visible parachute or ground reference, they can resemble fixed lights suspended in the atmosphere.[Global Security]globalsecurity.orgGlobal Security LUU-2 FlareGlobal SecurityLUU-2 Flare - Dumb Bombs7 Jul 2011 — The LUU-2 has a burn time of approximately 5 minutes while suspended from a parachute…
Terrain can imitate sudden extinction. Mountain ridges are difficult to see against a dark sky. A light disappearing behind one may appear to switch off in mid-air.
Sound is an unreliable guide. Distant aircraft may be inaudible, particularly when they are high, moving away or masked by traffic and wind. Sound also reaches an observer later than light, so the aircraft associated with a visible formation may not seem to occupy the expected position.
These effects become more powerful when combined. A group of aircraft can first appear as a silent solid triangle; later, flares from a separate exercise can appear as hovering lights. If the events occur on the same evening, later retellings may fuse them into a single object changing position or behaviour.
Why military explanations often arrive late
The Phoenix Lights controversy was intensified by poor communication. The military did not immediately present the public with a detailed account separating the earlier formation from the later flare exercise. By the time the Maryland Air National Guard connection was reported, the incident had already been framed as a statewide mystery.
There are ordinary reasons for such delays. Different units may control the airfield, aircraft, range and exercise. Visiting crews may have left Arizona before questions reach the correct public-affairs office. A local base spokesperson may truthfully know of no activity by that base while aircraft from another service or state are operating nearby. Training records also may not be organised around civilian sighting times and locations.
This creates a recurring problem in UFO reporting: an initial statement such as “we have no aircraft involved” can later be remembered as a categorical official denial, even when it meant only that a particular installation had not yet identified the responsible unit. A later correction then looks like a reversal or cover-up rather than the result of enquiries moving through a fragmented military system.
Secrecy can still be relevant. Some training details are restricted, and not every unusual object near military airspace should automatically be dismissed. Recent reports involving unidentified drones around defence facilities show that military personnel themselves sometimes encounter objects they cannot promptly identify. But institutional opacity is not evidence of extraterrestrial technology. It mainly makes timely verification more difficult.
How to test a suspected military sighting
A plausible military explanation should do more than point to the nearest air base. It should match the observation in several independent ways.
The most useful questions are:
- Was the sighting aligned with a known range, military route or approach corridor?
- Were visiting units or large exercises active at the time?
- Did the lights descend, drift, remain in formation or vanish behind terrain as the proposed explanation predicts?
- Do photographs from different locations place the lights over the same distant area?
- Are there flight records, range logs, pilot statements or contemporary press reports linking a specific unit to the event?
- Does the proposed aircraft or flare have the brightness and duration needed to remain visible from the witness location?
The Phoenix flare explanation performs well against these tests. It identifies a particular training area, a visiting Air National Guard unit, an appropriate aircraft type and parachute flares whose behaviour resembles the recorded lights. The earlier formation explanation has some supporting evidence, particularly the telescopic aircraft observation, but lacks the same level of publicly documented operational detail.[Phoenix New Times]phoenixnewtimes.comPhoenix New Times Phoenix Lights UFO mystery explanations | Phoenix New TimesPhoenix New Times Phoenix Lights UFO mystery explanations | Phoenix New Times
A weak explanation merely says that Arizona has many military bases. A strong one reconstructs the geometry and timing. Conversely, a report should not be labelled unexplained simply because no immediate military confirmation was obtained. Dates, viewing directions, terrain and the identity of all participating units must first be checked.
What military airspace explains — and what it does not
Arizona’s training infrastructure explains why the state repeatedly produces reports of unusual lights, triangles and apparently hovering objects. Operation Snowbird introduces visiting aircraft unfamiliar to local residents. The Barry M. Goldwater Range supports intensive flying and night exercises within sight of distant communities. Military routes carry aircraft between those areas, sometimes in formations that look very different from ordinary airline traffic.[af.mil]luke.af.mil56th Range Management Office56th Range Management Office
It also explains why honest witnesses can disagree. One observer may see separate aircraft, another may infer a solid craft, and a third may record only indistinct points of light. Their observations need not be fabricated for their interpretations to conflict.
Military activity cannot be used as a blanket answer for every Arizona report. Some cases lack the time, direction or documentation needed for a meaningful comparison. Others involve objects close to airports or aircraft and deserve investigation as possible drones, balloons or aviation hazards. “Near a range” is a clue, not a conclusion.
For the most famous Arizona case, however, the distinction is reasonably clear. The later Phoenix Lights were almost certainly illumination flares. The earlier V-shaped formation is less securely resolved, but conventional aircraft remain a substantial and evidence-supported explanation. Together, the episodes demonstrate how a genuine night exercise can become a lasting UFO legend when distance, darkness, unfamiliar formations and delayed official information converge.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Military Training Shapes Arizona UFO Sightings. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Includes military and pilot testimony relevant to airspace cases.
The Phoenix Lights
Military activity and the Phoenix Lights debate are closely connected.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromfighter jet model oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: 56th Range Management Office
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Units/56th-Range-Management-Office/
2.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: Operation Snowbird update > Davis-Monthan Air Force Base > Press Releases
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Media/Press-Releases/Article/314681/operation-snowbird-update/
3.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Media/Press-Releases/Article/666778/final-total-force-training-environmental-assessment-released/
4.
Source: faa.gov
Title: ENR 5.2: Military Exercise and Training Areas
Link:https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aip_html/part2_enr_section_5.2.html
Source snippet
ENR 5.2: Military Exercise and Training Areas...
5.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: snowbird offers desert training for us allies heading to iraq
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Media/Article-View/Article/314164/snowbird-offers-desert-training-for-us-allies-heading-to-iraq/
6.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: Barry M Goldwater Range East MAL
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/Barry_M_Goldwater_Range_East_MAL.pdf?ver=2016-03-02-150925-077
7.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: mil Snowbird, Tornado GR-4
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Media/Photos/igphoto/2000163116/
8.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil Barry M. Goldwater Range East
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Range%20Reader%20Volume%201%2C%20Issue%202.pdf
9.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: mil Collision Avoidance
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/MACA%20public%202024.pdf
10.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: Barry M Goldwater Range West MAL
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/Barry_M_Goldwater_Range_West_MAL.pdf?ver=2016-03-02-150742-500
11.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/ICEMAP.pdf?ver=2016-02-22-174027-217
12.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: proposal for erosion control measures on bmgr east
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2997719/proposal-for-erosion-control-measures-on-bmgr-east/
13.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: draft total force training environmental assessment available for public review
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Media/Press-Releases/Article/666816/draft-total-force-training-environmental-assessment-available-for-public-review/
14.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil Barry M. Goldwater Range East
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Range%20Reader%20Volume%201%2C%20Issue%201.pdf
15.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/2010%20Economic%20Impact%20Analysis.pdf?timestamp=1464035001726&ver=2016-02-24-175727-447
16.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil Barry M. Goldwater Range celebrates 75 Years
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1003697/barry-m-goldwater-range-celebrates-75-years/
17.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: mil355th Fighter Wing Davis-Monthan AFB
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/Community%20Liaison%20Documents/Draft%20Wyle%20Study.pdf?ver=2016-06-15-180539-443
18.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil Barry M. Goldwater Range Public Report
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/56%20RMO/BMGR_PublicReport.pdf
19.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/Final%20EA-April%202015-Appendix%20C.pdf?ver=2016-02-22-175005-073
20.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil BMG R Scenery
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2000909741/
21.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/2014TFT4.pdf?ver=2016-02-22-180104-883
22.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: 2018 Final INRMP ilovepdf compressed
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/2018%20Final%20INRMP-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf
23.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: dagger point with col jose sanchez
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Media/Article-View/Article/313478/dagger-point-with-col-jose-sanchez/
24.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil EAS T TACTICAL RANGE NO PUBLIC ACCESS §¨¦8
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/56%20RMO/BMGR-E%20Vistor%20Use%20Map%20%26%20Regulations.pdf
25.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: mil Final
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/Community%20Liaison%20Documents/Signed_Final_TFT_FONSI_14%20May%202015_for%20web.pdf?ver=2017-05-03-165917-463
26.
Source: luke.af.mil
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Luke%20Trifold%20Dec%202015.pdf?ver=2016-01-07-115952-733
27.
Source: dm.af.mil
Title: mil Final
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/Signed%20TFT.pdf?ver=2016-02-22-174950-980
28.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil Environmental Assessment
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Draft%20MAWTS-1%20BMGR%20EA%20%28complete%29.pdf
29.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/2014TFT1.pdf?ver=2016-02-22-175950-663
30.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: milintegrated natural resources management plan
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/2018%20BMGR%20Public%20Report_Final_092518-ilovepdf-compressed%20%281%29.pdf
31.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: mil Barry M. Goldwater Range
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/BMGR_INRMP_Final.pdf
32.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: milbarry m. goldwater range
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Documents/BMGR%20INRMP2018_Final_withFY19-20_Annual_Updates.pdf
33.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Newcomers/Welcome-to-DM/Library/Environmental-Assessment/
34.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: rsaf hone combat skills during forging sabre exercise
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/640795/rsaf-hone-combat-skills-during-forging-sabre-exercise/
35.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: Draft BMGR Public Report NA
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Draft%20BMGR%20Public%20Report_NA.pdf
36.
Source: dm.af.mil
Link:https://www.dm.af.mil/Portals/99/Docs/Final%20EA-April%202015-Appendix%20A.pdf?ver=2016-02-22-175134-560
Published: April 2015
37.
Source: luke.af.mil
Title: Luke Heritage Pamphlet 1941 2021 Expanded 20210930 1
Link:https://www.luke.af.mil/Portals/58/Luke%20Heritage%20Pamphlet%201941-2021%20Expanded%2020210930_1.pdf
38.
Source: phoenixnewtimes.com
Title: Phoenix New Times Phoenix Lights UFO mystery explanations | Phoenix New Times
Link:https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/uncategorized/phoenix-lights-ufo-mystery-explanations-19105870/
39.
Source: lasvegassun.com
Title: military now says flares may be cause of mysteriou
Link:https://lasvegassun.com/news/1997/jul/25/military-now-says-flares-may-be-cause-of-mysteriou/
Source snippet
Las Vegas SunMilitary now says flares may be cause of mysterious...25 Jul 1997 — It turns out visiting jets from the Maryland Air Nation...
40.
Source: globalsecurity.org
Title: Global Security LUU-2 Flare
Link:https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/luu2.htm
Source snippet
Global SecurityLUU-2 Flare - Dumb Bombs7 Jul 2011 — The LUU-2 has a burn time of approximately 5 minutes while suspended from a parachute...
41.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2008/07/the-mysterious-phoenix-lights/
42.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2016/07/SI-JA-16-16.pdf
43.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Phoenix Lights
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Lights
44.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Barry M. Goldwater Range
Link:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_M._Goldwater_Range
45.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: out of balance
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/out-of-balance/
46.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/2359/schedule/8/made/data.xht
47.
Source: planeandpilotmag.com
Title: the phoenix lights
Link:https://planeandpilotmag.com/the-phoenix-lights/
48.
Source: stampaday.wordpress.com
Title: the phoenix lights
Link:https://stampaday.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/the-phoenix-lights/
Additional References
49.
Source: towndock.net
Link:https://towndock.net/files/LUU_Parachute_Factsheet.pdf
Source snippet
The LUU-2D/B produces about 1.8 million candlepower of visual illumination for four to five minutes. diameter of 6,000 meters for...
50.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcDDofS5Huw
Source snippet
Kurt Russell Shares UFO "Phoenix Lights" Experience | UFO Witness...
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Former Arizona Governor Fife Symington on witnessing the Phoenix Lights
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1Fh0g5wJ7A
Source snippet
The UnXplained: The Phoenix Lights Phenomenon is STILL UNEXPLAINABLE (Season 5) | History...
52.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Unexplained Phoenix Lights Phenomenon
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npeCDLsyJwE
Source snippet
Former Arizona Governor Fife Symington on witnessing the Phoenix Lights...
53.
Source: faraim.org
Link:https://faraim.org/faa/aim/chapter-3/section-3-5-2.html
54.
Source: marines.mil
Link:https://www.marines.mil/News/Marines-TV/?dvpTag=round&videoid=289380
55.
Source: wrpinfo.org
Link:https://wrpinfo.org/media/1176/bmgr-w-wrp-mal-final-2016.pdf
56.
Source: marines.mil
Link:https://www.marines.mil/News/Marines-TV/videoid/536883/dvpTag/M240/
57.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/arizonaaviationflightpilotgroup/posts/4311113092442368/
58.
Source: marines.mil
Link:https://www.marines.mil/News/Marines-TV/?dvpTag=M16A4&videoid=650580