Within Oklahoma UFOs
What Do the Tulsa UFO Images Prove?
Alan Smith's Tulsa images survive in official archives, yet overexposure, missing camera data and uncertain scale prevent a firm identification.
On this page
- The photograph and film records
- What the images visibly establish
- Camera effects and evidential limits
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The Tulsa UFO images do not prove that an extraordinary craft flew over Oklahoma, but they are more significant than a stray newspaper reproduction. A colour photograph attributed to 14-year-old Alan Smith, together with related film material dated 2 August 1965, entered the holdings of the US Air Force’s Project Blue Book and survives in the US National Archives. That archival trail confirms that the material was collected and examined as evidence during Oklahoma’s major 1965 sighting wave.[The Unwritten Record]unwritten-record.blogs.archives.govThe Unwritten Record Aliens at the ArchivesTulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965”. (Local Identifier: 341-PBB-691-19)… Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”. For more…Read more…
What the images show is much narrower: a bright, multicoloured, roughly oval patch against a dark background. They do not securely establish its distance, size, structure or movement. The photographed light is heavily exposed, the camera information is incomplete, and there is no usable landscape reference from which scale can be calculated. Air Force analysts could neither confirm nor deny that the image represented an unidentified flying object, while noting that it resembled a rotating coloured floodlight photographed at night.[Scribd]scribd.comHewes, HaydenHewes, Hayden - The Intruders | PDFO: This report swers Work Order Number 66-UJ submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, Jr. Til;:·r/to…
How the Tulsa images entered the record
Smith reportedly took the best-known photograph at about 1.45 am on 2 August 1965, during the wave of coloured-light reports then spreading across Oklahoma and neighbouring states. Later accounts say that he was watching from his family’s Tulsa home with several relatives or neighbours and used a simple box-type camera. Witnesses described changing colours, pulsation and movement across the sky, although those details come from testimony rather than from the still photograph itself.[edmondlifeandleisure.com]edmondlifeandleisure.comtulsa paperboy made ufo history in p10411 87revolving filter flood light of the type used to illuminate and… So what ever became of the original Tulsa photo and negative? That…
The reported processing history is unusually important. According to a later Oklahoma account based partly on material collected by local investigator Hayden Hewes, the family did not immediately have the film developed. When the roll was processed, most frames reportedly showed nothing unusual, but an unprinted negative contained a coloured image near one corner. This meant that the familiar published version was an enlargement or crop rather than a full-frame photograph centred deliberately on the object.[edmondlifeandleisure.com]edmondlifeandleisure.comtulsa paperboy made ufo history in p10411 87revolving filter flood light of the type used to illuminate and… So what ever became of the original Tulsa photo and negative? That…
The picture subsequently circulated through newspapers and magazines and attracted Project Blue Book’s attention. The National Archives now identifies two related holdings: “Tulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965”, local identifier 341-PBB-691, and “Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”, identifier 341-PBB-691-19. Their preservation matters because it shows that Tulsa’s photographic evidence is not merely an image copied indefinitely through UFO books and websites. It forms part of a documented federal record series assembled during the Air Force investigation.[The Unwritten Record]unwritten-record.blogs.archives.govThe Unwritten Record Aliens at the ArchivesTulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965”. (Local Identifier: 341-PBB-691-19)… Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”. For more…Read more…
Archival survival should not, however, be confused with official authentication. Project Blue Book routinely received photographs, prints and negatives from witnesses. The Air Force made or retained copies for investigation, and those working materials later became part of the archival collection. Inclusion therefore means that evidence was submitted and preserved, not that the government judged the photographed object to be an advanced vehicle or something extraterrestrial.[The Unwritten Record]unwritten-record.blogs.archives.govThe Unwritten Record Aliens at the ArchivesTulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965”. (Local Identifier: 341-PBB-691-19)… Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”. For more…Read more…
What the photograph and film visibly establish
The strongest defensible conclusion is that photographic film recorded a bright coloured source or pattern. The image is not simply a verbal recollection: there is a physical visual record associated with a specific date, place and Blue Book investigation. The surviving material also preserves colour information, which was comparatively uncommon in widely publicised UFO photographs of the period.
Beyond that basic point, the photograph is frustratingly uninformative. The enlarged image appears to contain overlapping areas of white, blue-green and reddish light, producing an oval or irregular disc-like impression. Yet there is no clearly resolved fuselage, rim, window, landing gear or other structural feature. The apparent outline is largely the boundary between a bright exposure and the surrounding darkness, not necessarily the physical edge of an object.
The image also contains no reliable reference points. There is no building, tree, cloud layer or horizon at the same apparent distance. Consequently, a small light close to the camera and a much larger source far away could produce similar angular dimensions. Estimates sometimes repeated in later UFO literature — including claims that the object was tens of feet across and less than a mile away — should therefore be treated cautiously unless supported by complete camera settings, geometry and original analytical worksheets. Popular summaries often state such dimensions more confidently than the surviving evidential basis appears to allow.[Think About It Docs]thinkaboutitdocs.com1965 tulsa oklahoma ufo photographSmith, aged 14, took this photograph at about 1:45 a.m. on 2 August 1965. Five other witnesses saw the UFO change color from white to…
The film designation in the archives can also be misunderstood. In archival language, “film” may refer to photographic film or special-media material and does not automatically mean that a continuous motion-picture sequence captured the object manoeuvring. The National Archives lists a general Tulsa film item and a colour close-up, but its public description does not by itself establish a long, independently analysable movie showing a structured craft in flight.[The Unwritten Record]unwritten-record.blogs.archives.govThe Unwritten Record Aliens at the ArchivesTulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965”. (Local Identifier: 341-PBB-691-19)… Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”. For more…Read more…
That distinction matters because genuine motion across several frames could supply information unavailable from one still image: changes in position, consistent edges, acceleration, camera movement and comparison with fixed stars or foreground objects. The publicly described Tulsa holdings do not provide enough contextual information to make those measurements securely.
Why the Air Force did not reach a firm identification
The surviving wording attributed to the Air Force photographic analysis is notably restrained. The work was reportedly commissioned under Work Order 66-UJ for an object photographed in Tulsa on 2 August 1965. The analysts concluded that, on the information furnished, they could neither confirm nor deny its identification as an unidentified flying object. They also observed that the image resembled the effect produced by photographing a multicoloured revolving-filter floodlight, such as decorative lights used to illuminate aluminium Christmas trees.[scribd.com]scribd.comHewes, HaydenHewes, Hayden - The Intruders | PDFO: This report swers Work Order Number 66-UJ submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, Jr. Til;:·r/to…
This was not a positive identification of a particular lamp found at the Smith home. It was a comparison based on image appearance. That makes it a plausible demonstration of how the photograph might have been produced, not a conclusive solution.
Equally, the inconclusive wording is not evidence that analysts detected an exotic vehicle. In photographic examination, “unidentified” often means that the available image lacks enough information to distinguish among competing possibilities. A distant airborne light, a nearby illuminated object, an intentional set-up or an ordinary source distorted by exposure may remain visually indistinguishable once the brightest areas of the negative have lost detail.
Later advocates argued that computer enhancement showed a large, genuine craft. Such conclusions are limited by the principle that enhancement can reveal faint information already present but cannot recover physical detail that was never recorded. Claims that analysis found no obvious retouching or alteration would address only one question — whether the negative had been edited — and would not rule out a small model, projected light, decorative lamp or other staged source placed before the shutter was released.[Think About It Docs]thinkaboutitdocs.com1965 tulsa oklahoma ufo photographSmith, aged 14, took this photograph at about 1:45 a.m. on 2 August 1965. Five other witnesses saw the UFO change color from white to…
Camera effects and evidential limits
The chief problem is overexposure. When a bright light is photographed against a dark sky, the luminous area can spread beyond the source’s true boundary through glare, imperfect focus and scattering within the lens and film emulsion. This “bloom” creates soft halos and enlarged shapes, particularly around intense points of light. Colour can also bleed between adjacent regions, turning a compact source into what appears to be a layered or rotating object.[Dehancer Blog]blog.dehancer.comBlog Bloom: what it is and how it worksBlog Bloom: what it is and how it works
Once the film’s brightest area is saturated, its internal detail is lost. Darkening or digitally sharpening a scan may make the perimeter look more dramatic, but it cannot reliably reconstruct the surface of the original source. The Tulsa photograph’s coloured bands may therefore represent genuine colour changes, camera motion, movement of the light, a rotating filter or a combination of these effects.
Several missing variables prevent stronger analysis:
- Exposure time: A long exposure can stretch movement into an oval, arc or overlapping pattern.
- Focus distance: A nearby light photographed out of focus can look larger and more structured than it was.
- Aperture and film speed: These determine how rapidly a bright source overwhelms the negative.
- Camera stability: Hand movement during exposure can produce apparent zigzags, duplicated colours or asymmetry.
- Full-frame geometry: A cropped enlargement removes information about the object’s original position and apparent angular size.
- Reference objects: Without a horizon or foreground feature, distance and physical diameter cannot be derived.
- Original negative history: Later copies, enlargements and magazine reproductions may alter contrast, colour and edge appearance.
These are not merely modern objections imposed on an old case. They are the kinds of metadata gaps that continue to restrict investigation of unusual aerial imagery. NASA’s independent UAP study noted that analysis is hindered by poor sensor calibration, missing metadata, insufficient baseline information and the absence of multiple simultaneous measurements. The Tulsa material illustrates nearly all of those weaknesses.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportScience Independent Study Team Report
Did later reporting strengthen the case?
Later circulation made the Tulsa photograph more famous, but not necessarily more probative. Publication in magazines and repeated enlargement gave the image cultural importance and helped establish it as one of Oklahoma’s best-known UFO pictures. Yet each generation of copying also separated the familiar coloured close-up from the original frame, processing notes and camera conditions.
The witness context gives the photograph some support. Smith was reportedly not alone, and other Tulsa residents described coloured lights during the same period. That reduces the likelihood that the entire regional episode originated solely with one teenager. It does not demonstrate that his camera recorded the same distant object described by every other witness, nor that any of those lights were unconventional craft.[edmondlifeandleisure.com]edmondlifeandleisure.comtulsa paperboy made ufo history in p10411 87revolving filter flood light of the type used to illuminate and… So what ever became of the original Tulsa photo and negative? That…
The provenance has also become less complete over time. Later reporting said that the whereabouts of the original photograph and negative were uncertain, while copies had passed through investigators and television production. If the first-generation negative is no longer available with a documented chain of custody, fresh forensic work must rely on archival duplicates or later-generation copies, which limits fine-grained conclusions.[edmondlifeandleisure.com]edmondlifeandleisure.comtulsa paperboy made ufo history in p10411 87revolving filter flood light of the type used to illuminate and… So what ever became of the original Tulsa photo and negative? That…
More recent online claims have proposed specific hoax methods, including comparisons with artwork or artificial light sources. These remain hypotheses rather than demonstrated reconstructions unless they can be tied to materials available to Smith, the original camera geometry and a repeatable image-making process. The strongest sceptical argument is therefore not that one particular hoax has been proved. It is that the photograph lacks the contextual data required to exclude several ordinary methods of producing a similar result.[Metabunk]metabunk.orgalan smith colour ufo photo 1965.14368alan smith colour ufo photo 1965.14368
What the Tulsa images ultimately prove
The Tulsa material proves that an unusual-looking coloured exposure was recorded during Oklahoma’s 1965 UFO wave, submitted for investigation and retained in Project Blue Book’s archival holdings. It also shows why photographs can seem more decisive than they are: the image gives the impression of a luminous, structured object while withholding the distance, scale and camera information needed to test that impression.
The case is best classified as historically important but evidentially weak. It is not fully debunked, because no conventional source has been conclusively matched to the exposure. It is not strong evidence for an extraordinary aircraft, because the image lacks resolved structure, measurable scale, dependable motion data and complete photographic metadata. The Air Force’s own cautious assessment — unable to identify the source while recognising similarities to an artificial rotating light — remains broadly consistent with what the surviving evidence can support.
Within Oklahoma’s UFO history, the Tulsa images matter less as proof of a craft than as a compact lesson in evidential limits. They preserve a genuine artefact from the state’s most important sighting wave, but the artefact records light far more clearly than it records an object.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Do the Tulsa UFO Images Prove?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Explains official treatment of photographic submissions.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: The Unwritten Record Aliens at the Archives
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2017/04/26/aliens-at-the-archives/
Source snippet
Tulsa, Oklahoma Film, 8/2/1965”. (Local Identifier: 341-PBB-691-19)... Tulsa, Oklahoma Film Color Closeup, 8/2/1965”. For more...Read more...
2.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: Pieces of Historyreport.pdf
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2018/03/report.pdf
Source snippet
Pieces of HistoryThe files relate to investigations of reports of sightings of unidentified flying objects … called Project BLUE BOOK. ph...
3.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Hewes, Hayden
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/803216642/Hewes-Hayden-The-Intruders
Source snippet
Hewes, Hayden - The Intruders | PDFO: This report swers Work Order Number 66-UJ submitted by Major H. Quintanilla, Jr. Til;:·r/to...
4.
Source: edmondlifeandleisure.com
Title: tulsa paperboy made ufo history in p10411 87
Link:https://edmondlifeandleisure.com/tulsa-paperboy-made-ufo-history-in-p10411-87.htm
Source snippet
revolving filter flood light of the type used to illuminate and... So what ever became of the original Tulsa photo and negative? That...
5.
Source: blog.dehancer.com
Title: Blog Bloom: what it is and how it works
Link:https://blog.dehancer.com/articles/bloom-what-it-is-and-how-it-works/
6.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf
7.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
8.
Source: metabunk.org
Title: alan smith colour ufo photo 1965.14368
Link:https://www.metabunk.org/threads/alan-smith-colour-ufo-photo-1965.14368/
9.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/doc/164052774/Ufo-Photographs-Portraits-of-a-Myth
10.
Source: scribd.com
Title: UFO Evidence 1964 pdf
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/356924844/UFO-Evidence-1964-pdf
11.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
12.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: update nasa shares uap independent study report names director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/
13.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: announces unidentified aerial phenomena study team members
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/
14.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: to release discuss unidentified anomalous phenomena report
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/
15.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: provides coverage of unidentified anomalous phenomena meeting
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-provides-coverage-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-meeting/
16.
Source: smd-cms.nasa.gov
Title: 2020 2024 nasa science plan yr 23 update final
Link:https://smd-cms.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2020-2024-nasa-science-plan-yr-23-update-final.pdf
17.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: fy 2026 q1 foia log.xlsx
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/fy-2026-q1-foia-log.xlsx?emrc=2566e7
18.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/2023-agency-foia-log.xlsx?emrc=54069a
19.
Source: archives.gov
Title: rf 2018 foia log
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/pdf/rf-2018-foia-log.pdf
20.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/periodicals/nara-citations/genealogy.html
21.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/iwg/declassified-records/rg-226-oss/entry-210.pdf
22.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/publications/ref-info-papers/rip103.pdf
23.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/research/cartographic/pi-195-soil-conservation-service.pdf
24.
Source: archives.gov
Title: 1999 mar
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/nhprc/annotation/1999/1999-mar.pdf
25.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/scheduling/permanent-records/dal-crosswalk.xlsx
26.
Source: archives.gov
Title: nprc crg part11 508
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/pdf/nprc-crg-part11-508.pdf
27.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/about/history/sources/reports/1938-annual-report.pdf
28.
Source: thinkaboutitdocs.com
Title: 1965 tulsa oklahoma ufo photograph
Link:https://thinkaboutitdocs.com/1965-tulsa-oklahoma-ufo-photograph/
Source snippet
Smith, aged 14, took this photograph at about 1:45 a.m. on 2 August 1965. Five other witnesses saw the UFO change color from white to...
Published: August 1965
29.
Source: tfl.gov.uk
Title: 341 bus route
Link:https://tfl.gov.uk/bus/route/341/
30.
Source: tfl.gov.uk
Title: 341 bus route
Link:https://tfl.gov.uk/bus/route/341/?direction=inbound
31.
Source: tfl.gov.uk
Title: 341 bus timetable
Link:https://tfl.gov.uk/bus/timetable/341/
32.
Source: tfl.gov.uk
Title: 341 bus timetable
Link:https://tfl.gov.uk/bus/timetable/341/?direction=outbound&fromId=490010709S
33.
Source: tfl.gov.uk
Title: 341 bus timetable
Link:https://tfl.gov.uk/bus/timetable/341/?direction=inbound
Additional References
34.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Project Blue Book: Declassified
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKzI3uu_oTQ
Source snippet
"Alan Smith" Tulsa UFO 1965 Jovem fotografa nos anos 60 um estranho UFO multicolorido nos céus da cidade de Tulsa Estranhos Entre Nós...
35.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQRJy3hdXnY
Source snippet
Project Blue Book: Declassified - The True Story of the D.C. UFO Sightings | History...
36.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Forgotten Pioneer of UFO Research: Hayden Hewes & the Rise of the IUFOB
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kubEzrvagiM
Source snippet
CR Ep 144: Hayden Hewes Archive with Mindy Tautfest / Signs of the Times with Archbishop James Cloud...
37.
Source: mauritius-images.com
Link:https://www.mauritius-images.com/en/asset/ME-PI-6259116_mauritius_images_image_number_11921743_ufo-photographed-2nd-august-1965-by-alan-smith-14-in-his-garden-at-tulsa-oklahoma-usa-using-a-simple-box-camera-the-light-changed-colour-pulsated-and-made-a-whining-sound-enlargement-of-light-c-topfoto-fortean
Source snippet
Mauritius ImagesUFO photographed 2nd August 1965 by Alan Smith (14) in...UFO photographed 2nd August 1965 by Alan Smith (14) in his gard...
Published: August 1965
38.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Audio Blog: Hayden Hewes and the International UFO Bureau
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW7h4Gy7psw
Source snippet
The Forgotten Pioneer of UFO Research: Hayden Hewes & the Rise of the IUFOB...
39.
Source: midimagic.sgc-hosting.com
Title: TH E TULSA PHOTO
Link:https://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com/howituls.htm
Source snippet
THE TULSA PHOTO - MidiMagicOn August 2, 1965, Alan Smith allegedly took a photo of an unidentified flying object (UFO) in Tulsa Oklahoma...
Published: August 2, 1965
40.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Project Blue Book at National Archives Museum
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHeZjJgO9Ns
Source snippet
AudioBlog: Hayden Hewes and the International UFO Bureau...
41.
Source: rediff.com
Link:https://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-is-there-anybody-out-there-the-most-famous-ufo-sightings/20120627.htm
42.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/TravelChannel/videos/man-films-flying-disco-ball-in-night-sky/1560704744120377/
43.
Source: glass.photo
Link:https://glass.photo/photography-terms/overexposure